Abstract
Key problems of Integrated Water Resources Management refer to interactions between various levels, scales and existing coordination gaps, such as inadequate governance structures and insufficient knowledge and capacities. In this study we describe a management framework that aligns model-based systems analysis with capacity assessments suggesting a concept for improving cross-scale interactions and thus for overcoming both, water-related pressures and coordination gaps. In the study we (i) identify the missing link between technical development approaches and capacity development, (ii) outline interrelations between environmental pressures on aquatic systems and capacity and information gaps in a transparent way, and (iii) introduce a practice-relevant method to combine model-based system planning with capacity assessments for deriving management options that support water management actors in reducing pressures and gaps. The results of the integrated analysis are made explicit by introducing a matrix approach that is inspired by an existing framework to systematically differentiate water quality-related pressures (cf. Blumensaat et al. 2013). The approach confronts pressures and gaps and so jointly addresses technical issues, institutional challenges, organizational development, information needs, and human resources development. The concept supports a transparent decision making process by identifying knowledge and capacities required for the implementation of corresponding technical intervention options and vice versa. The application of the method in the International Water Research Alliance Saxony model region ‘Ukraine’ is illustrated to demonstrate the added value as a boundary object between scales that is supporting actors in streamlining model-based planning and capacity development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We define management options as a combination of ‘technical intervention options’/rehabilitation measures, such as the implementation of innovative treatment technology at a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with capacity development measures, for example the establishment of training courses for operating personnel.
Asymmetry of information is a general problem in environmental policy making (Krutilla and Krause 2011).
Social learning is according to Reed et al. (2010) defined as (i) a change in understanding in the individuals, (ii) goes beyond individual learning and is within wider social units and (iii) change occurs through interactions between actors within a social network (meetings, media, Web 2.0).
This reflects the aforementioned multi-level approach. Yet, we turn it upside down for the sake of clarification and define it as sub-scales.
The first level of Ukraine’s administrative division is called oblast (state).
http://krogerc.info/ua/tarifs/bycapital/sink.html (in Ukrainian; accessed 29/10/2014).
This is completely in accordance with the Ukrainian action plan for water management until 2020.
References
Alaerts GJ (2009) Knowledge and capacity development (KCD) as tool for institutional strengthening and change. In: Alaerts GJ, Dickinson N (eds) Water for a changing world—developing local knowledge and capacity. Delft
Alaerts GJ, Kaspersma JM (2009) Progress and challenges in knowledge and capacity development. In: Blokland M, Alaerts GJ, Kaspersma JM, Hare M (eds) Capacity development for improved water management. CRC Press, London
Bartels M, Rach Y, Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (eds) (2009) Twinning projects led by Germany—relevance, effectiveness, impact and sustainability. An evaluation of outcomes by the German National Coordinator for Twinning. Documentation Nr. 578. http://www.bmwi.de/English/Redaktion/Pdf/documentation-578-twinning-projects
Benedetti L, Blumensaat F, Bönisch G, Dirckx G, Jardin N, Krebs P, Vanrolleghem PA (2005) Systems analysis of urban wastewater systems—two systematic approaches to analyse a complex system. Water Sci Technol 52(12):171–179
Biswas AK (2004) Integrated water resources management: a reassessment. A water forum contribution. Water Int 29(2):248–256
Blumensaat F (2010) Model-based optimisation of urban wastewater systems perspectives for the Poltva River from an engineering view point. Perspectives for the Poltva River in Lviv international conference and workshop. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Lviv, Ukraine
Blumensaat F, Tranckner J, Hoeft S, Jardin N, Krebs P (2009) Quantifying effects of interacting optimisation measures in urban drainage systems. Urban Water Journal 6(2):93–105
Blumensaat F, Wolfram M, Krebs P (2012) Sewer model development under minimum data requiremens. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1427–1437. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1146-1
Blumensaat F, Tränckner J, Helm B, Kroll S, Dirckx G, Krebs P (2013) An adaptive framework to differentiate water quality impacts on a multi-scale level. Water Sci Technol 67(2):424–432
Cash DW, Adger W, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8
Charbit C (2011) Governance of public policies in decentralized contexts: the multi-level approach. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2011/04, OECD Publishing, Paris
Davis LE, North DC (1971) Institutional change and American economic growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dietrich O, Steidl J, Pavlik D (2012) The impact of global change on the water balance of large wetlands in the Elbe Lowland. Reg Environ Change 12(4):701–713
Ertel AMA, Lupo A, Scheifhacken N, Bodnarchuk T, Manturova O, Berendonk TU, Petzoldt T (2012) Heavy load and high potential: anthropogenic pressures and their impacts on the water quality along a lowland river (Western Bug, Ukraine). Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1459–1473
Gibson C, Ostrom E, Ahn T-K (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239
Global Water Partnership (GWP) (2000) Integrated water resources management. TAC Background Papers, No. 4, Stockholm
Gupta J, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) Global water governance in the context of global and multilevel governance: its need, form, and challenges. Ecol Soc 18(4):53
Guston DH (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Hum Values 26(4):399–408
Hagemann N, Leidel M (2014) River basin management in Ukraine. In: Huitema D, Meijerink S, Verduijn S (eds) The politics of river basin organizations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 210–233
Hagemann N, Klauer B, Moynihan RM, Leidel M, Scheifhacken N (2014a) The role of institutional and legal constraints on river water quality monitoring in Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3307-5
Hagemann N, Blumensaat F, Tavares Wahren F, Trümper J, Burmeister C, Moynihan R, Scheifhacken N (2014b) The long road to improving the water quality of the Western Bug River (Ukraine)—a multi-scale analysis. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol
Hoff H (2011) Understanding the Nexus. Background paper for the Bonn 2011 conference: the water, energy and food security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm
Hooper BP, Mcdonald GT, Mitchell B (1999) Facilitating integrated resource and environmental management: Australian and Canadian perspectives. J Environ Plan Manag 42(5):747–766
Kalbus E, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O, Krüger E, Seegert J, Röstel G, Teutsch G, Borchardt D, Krebs P (2012) Integrated water resources management under different hydrological, climatic and socio-economic conditions. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1363–1366. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1330-3
Krutilla K, Krause R (2011) Transaction costs and environmental policy: an assessment framework and literature review. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 4(3–4):261–354
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas MJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sust Sci 7:25–43
Leidel M, Niemann S, Hagemann N (2012) Capacity development as key factor for integrated water resources management (IWRM): improving water management in the Western Bug River Basin, Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci. 65(5):1415–1426. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1223-5
Leidel M, Seegert J, Niemann S, Stefan C, Mai Phan H, Weigelt C, Grundmann J, Lennartz F, Bernhofer C (2014) Fostering water management through capacity development—lessons from the International Water Research Alliance Saxony (IWAS). In: Hülsmann S, Ardakanian R (eds) Proceedings of the special session “Societal Concerns and Capacity Development” at the symposium of European Freshwater Sciences (SEFS 8). ISBN 978-3-944863-08-5
Lopes C, Theisohn Th (2003) Ownership, leadership and transformation. Can we do better for capacity development? Earthscan, London
Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey BJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecol Soc 13(2):29
Meinzen-Dick R (2007) Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702296104
Mollinga P (2008) The rational organisation of dissent. Boundary concepts, boundary objects and boundary settings in the interdisciplinary study of natural resources management. ZEF Working Paper Series, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, Bonn
Mollinga P (2010) Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management. Crop Sci 50:S-1–S-9. doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0570
Moss T (2003) Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU Water Framework Directive. In: Breit H, Engels A, Moss T, Troja M (eds) How institutions change. Perspectives on social learning in global and local environmental contexts. Leske+Budrich, Opladen, pp 85–121
Moss T, Newig J (2010) Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: setting the stage for a broader debate. Environ Manag 46(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9531-1
OECD (2012) Meeting the water reform challenge. In: OECD studies on water. OECD, Washington. doi:10.1787/9789264170001-en
Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Requirements for adaptive water management. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management. Springer, New York, pp 1–22
Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34
Pahl-Wostl C, Vörösmarty C, Bhaduri A, Bogardi J, Rockström J, Alcamo J (2013) Towards a sustainable water future: shaping the next decade of global water research. Curr Opin Environ Sust 5:708–714
Pavlik D, Sohl D, Pluntke T, Mykhnovych A, Bernhofer C (2012) Dynamic downscaling of global climate projections for Eastern Europe with a horizontal resolution of 7 km. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1475–1482. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1081-1
Pearson J (2011) LenCD learning package on capacity development. http:// www.lencd.org/learning
Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2008) Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Nat Sci Soc 16:111–121. doi:10.1051/nss:2008035
Reed MSA, Evely C, Cundill, G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, Stringer LC (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15(4): r1. [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/
Roggero M, Fritsch O (2010) Mind the costs: rescaling and multi-level environmental governance in Venice Lagoon. Environ Manage 46:17–28. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9449-7
Roth M, Nobis R, Stetsuik V, Kruhlov I (eds) (2008) Transformation process in the Western Ukraine—concept for sustainable land use. Weissensee Verlag Oekologie, Berlin
Salamé L, van der Zaag P (2010) Enhanced knowledge and education systems for strengthening the capacity of transboundary water management. In: Earle A, Jägerskog A, Öjendaal J (eds) Transboundary water management. London, Washington D.C., pp 171–186
Schanze J, Trümper J, Burmeister C, Pavlik D, Kruhlov I (2012) A methodology for dealing with regional change in integrated water resources management. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1405–1414. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1311-6
Scheifhacken N, Haase U, Gram-Radu L, Kozovyi R, Berendonk TU (2012) How to assess hydromorphology? A comparison of Ukrainian and German approaches. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1483–1499
Sigel K, Hagemann N, Leidel M, Niemann S, Weigelt C (2014) Insights regarding transdisciplinarity and knowledge transfer gained from two case studies on integrated water resources management in Ukraine and Mongolia. Interdiscip Sci Rev 39(4):343–361
Speed R, Li Y, Le Quesne T, Pegram G, Zhiwei Z (2013) Basin water allocation planning. Principles, procedures and approaches for basin allocation planning. UNESCO, Paris
Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci. 19, Nr. 3. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
Helm B, Terekhanova T, Tränckner J (2012) Attributiveness of a mass flow analysis model for integrated water resources assessment under data-scarce conditions. Water Sci Technol. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.497
Timmerman JG, Beinat E, Termeer CJAM, Cofino WP (2010) A methodology to bridge the water information gap. Water Sci Technol 62(10):2419–2426
Ubels J, Fowler A, Acquaye-Baddoo N-A (eds) (2010) Capacity development in practice. Earthscan, London
UNESCO (2009) IWRM guidelines at river basin level. Part 1 and part 2. 1
van Hofwegen P (2004) Capacity-building for water and irrigation sector management with application in Indonesia. FAO Water Reports 26. FAO, Rome
Vreugdenhil H, Slinger J, Kater E, Thissen W (2010) The influence of scale preferences on the design of a water innovation: a case in Dutch River management. Environ Manag 46(1):29–43. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9524-0
Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale (global environmental accords: strategies for sustainability). MIT Press, Cumberland
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funding from the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the project “IWAS—International Water Research Alliance Saxony” (Grant 02WM1027 and 02WM1028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leidel, M., Hagemann, N., Seegert, J. et al. Supporting decisions in water management by exploring information and capacity gaps: experiences from an IWRM study in the Western Bug River Basin, Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci 72, 4771–4786 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3863-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3863-8