Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic downscaling of global climate projections for Eastern Europe with a horizontal resolution of 7 km

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change is one of the key factors influencing the quantity and quality of water resources in hydrologically sensitive regions. In order to downscale global climate simulations from horizontal resolutions of about 125–200 km to about 7 km, a double nesting strategy was chosen. The modelling approach was implemented with the Regional Climate Model CCLM (COSMO-Climate Local Model) with a first nesting covering a central part of Europe and with a second nesting covering parts of Poland, Belarus, and the Ukraine. A control run—driven by global reanalysis data—was evaluated by comparing the model results with corresponding reference data. Long-term yearly and monthly mean differences of temperature and precipitation were statistically assessed. As reference data for the first nesting, the gridded CRU data set with a horizontal resolution of about 55 km was used. Station data of the NOAA and ECA databases were interpolated to provide an appropriate reference data set for the second nesting. Both nestings overestimated long-term yearly precipitation means. Seasonal evaluation of the first nesting showed positive precipitation biases for spring and winter months and negative biases in summer. Furthermore, differences in the spatial precipitation patterns occured, especially in the high mountain area of the Carpathians. The second nesting overestimated precipitation in spring and summer with smaller biases than in the first nesting. Long-term area means of temperature were properly reproduced. The first nesting showed an overestimation for all months with maximal deviations in summer and spring. In contrast, the second nesting was slightly too warm for summer and autumn and too cold for winter and spring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ERA40—ECMWF Re-Analysis Project 40, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading RG2 9AX0, UK.

  2. CRU—Climate Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

  3. NOAA—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Room 5123, Washington DC 20230, USA.

  4. ECA&D—European Climate Assessment & Dataset project, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), P.O. Box 201, 3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands.

  5. parallel data set means data from another database of the same station (NOAA or ECA&D database).

References

  • Bachner S, Kapala A, Simmer C (2008) Evaluation of daily precipitation characteristics in the CLM and their sensitivity to parameterizations. Meteorol Z 17:407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benestad RE, Hanssen-Bauer I, Chen D (2008) Empirical-Statistical downscaling. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumensaat F, Wolfram M, Krebs P (2011) Sewer model development under minimum data requirements. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1146-1 (this issue)

  • Böhm U, Kücken M, Ahrens W, Block A, Hauffe D, Keuler K, Rockel B, Will A (2006) CLM-the climate version of LM: brief description and long-term applications. COSMO Newsl 6:225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Botyloch MB (ed.) (2007) Environmental Atlas of Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

  • Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon WT, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 848–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen J, Hulme M, von Storch H, Whetton P, Jones R, Mearns L, Fu C (2001) Regional climate information—evaluation and projections. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Chapt 10, pp 583–629

  • Delfs JO, Blumensaat F, Wang W, Krebs P, Kolditz O (2011) Coupling hydrogeological with surface runoff model in a Poltva case study in Western Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1285-4 (this issue)

  • Dierer S, Arpagaus M, Seifert A, Avgoustoglou E, Dumitrache R, Grazzini F, Mercogliano P, Milelli M, Starosta K (2009) Deficiencies in quantitative precipitation forecasts: sensitivity studies using the COSMO model. Meteorol Z 18:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertel A, Lupo A, Scheifhacken N, Bodnarchuk T, Manturova O, Berendonk TU, Petzoldt T (2011) Heavy load and high potential. Anthropogenic pressures and their impacts on the water quality along a lowland river (Western Bug, Ukraine). Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1289-0 (this issue)

  • Feldmann H, Früh B, Schädler G, Panitz HJ, Keuler K, Jacob D, Lorenz P (2008) Evaluation of the precipitation for South-Western Germany from high resolution simulations with regional climate models. Meteorol Z 17:455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frei C, Christensen JH, Déqué M, Jacob D, Jones RG, Vidale PL (2003) Daily precipitation statistics in regional climate models: Evaluation and intercomparison for the European Alps. J Geophys Res 108:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Groisman PY, Kokknaeva VV, Belokrylova TA, Karl TR (1991) Overcoming biases of precipitation measurement: a history of the USSR experience. B Am Meteorol Soc 72:1725–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Klein Tank AMG, Klok EJ, Jones PD, New M (2008) A European daily high resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J Geophys Res 113

  • Hewitson C, Crane RG (1996) Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Clim Res 7:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterding A (2003) Entwicklung hybrider Interpolationsverfahren für den automatisierten Betrieb am Beispiel meteorologischer Größen. Inst. f. Geoinformatik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, IfGIprints, 19, Münster, Germany (in German)

  • Jacob D, Bärring L, Christensen OB, Christensen JH, de Castro M, Déqué M, Giorgi F, Hagemann S, Hirschi M, Jones R, Kjellström E, Lenderink G, Rockel B, Sánchez E, Schär C, Seneviratne SI, Somot S, van Ulden A, van den Hurk B (2007) An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: model performance in present-day climate. Climatic Change 81:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger EB, Anders I, Lüthi D, Rockel B, Schär C, Seneviratne SI (2008) Analysis of ERA40-driven CLM simulations for Europe. Meteorol Z 17:349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbacher T, Delfs JO, Shao H, Wang W, Walther M, Samaniego L, Schneider C, Musolff A, Centler F, Sun F, Hildebrandt A, Liedl R, Borchardt D, Krebs P, Kolditz O (2011) The IWAS-ToolBox: Software coupling for an integrated water resources management. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1270-y (this issue)

  • Kalbus E, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O, Krüger E, Seegert J, Teutsch G, Borchardt D, Krebs P (2011): IWAS—integrated water resources management under different hydrological, climatic and socioeconomic conditions. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1330-3 (this issue)

  • Klein Tank AMG, Wijngaard JB, Können GP, Böhm R, Demarée G, Gocheva A, Mileta M, Pashiardis S, Hejkrlik L, Kern-Hansen C, Heino R, Bessemoulin P, Müller-Westermeier G, Tzanakou M, Szalai S, Pálsdóttir T, Fitzgerald D, Rubin S, Capaldo M, Maugeri M, Leitass A, Bukantis A, Aberfeld R, van Engelen AFV, Forland E, Mietus M, Coelho F, Mares C, Razuvaev V, Nieplova E, Cegnar T, Antonio López J, Dahlström B, Moberg A, Kirchhofer W, Ceylan A, Pachaliuk O, Alexander LV, Petrovic P (2002) Daily data set of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment. Int J Climatol 22:1441–1453. (Data and metadata available at http://eca.knmi.nl)

  • Leidel M, Niemann S, Hagemann N (2011) Capacity development as key factor for integrated water resources management (IWRM)—Improving water management in the Western Bug River Basin, Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1223-5 (this issue)

  • Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW S, Sauter T, Theme M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Thiele-Eich I (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change. recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys, RG 3003(48):1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P (2000) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: development of 1901–1996 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate. J Clim 13:2217–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2010) http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov

  • Pebesma EJ, Wesseling CG (1998) Gstat, a program for geostatistical modelling, prediction and simulation. Comput Geosci 24:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter D (1995) Ergebnisse methodischer Untersuchungen zur Korrektur des systematischen Messfehlers des Hellmann-Niederschlagsmessers. Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, 194 (in German)

  • Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Z 17:347–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roesch A, Jaeger EB, Lüthi D, Seneviratne SI (2008) Analysis of CCLM model biases in relation to intra-ensemble model variability. Meteorol Z 17:369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanze J, Trümper J, Burmeister C, Pavlik D, Kruhlov I (2011) A methodology for dealing with regional change in integrated water resources management. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1311-6 (this issue)

  • Scheifhacken N, Haase U, Gram-Radu L, Kozovyi R, Berendonk T (2011) How to assess hydromorphology? A comparison of Ukrainian and German approaches. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1218-2 (this issue)

  • Smiatek G, Rockel B, Schättler U (2008) Time invariant data preprocessor for the climate version of the COSMO model (COSMO-CLM). Meteorol Z 17:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suklitsch M, Gobiet A, Truhetz H, Awan NK, Göttel H, Jacob D (2010) Error characteristics of high resolution regional climate models over the Alpine area. Clim Dyn. doi: 10.1007/s00382-010-0848-5

  • Tavares Wahren F, Tarasiuk M, Mykhnovych A, Kit M, Feger KH, Schwärzel K (2011) Estimation of spatially distributed soil information. Dealing with data shortages in the Western Bug Basin, Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1197-3 (this issue)

  • Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, Da Costa Bechtold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, Vande Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof F, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hòlm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf JF, Morcrette JJ, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 Re-Analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (2006) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the project “IWAS—International Water Research Alliance Saxony” (grant 02WM1028). The authors would like to thank the Centre for Information Services and High Performance Computing in Dresden (ZIH) for providing the high performance computer resources and for support, the German High Performance Computing Centre for Climate and Earth System Research (DKRZ) for providing the ERA40 data set, the State Environment Agency Rheinland–Pfalz, Germany, for providing the software package InterMet and the CLM-Community for providing access to and support for the CCLM as well as for scientific discussions and valuable advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Pavlik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlik, D., Söhl, D., Pluntke, T. et al. Dynamic downscaling of global climate projections for Eastern Europe with a horizontal resolution of 7 km. Environ Earth Sci 65, 1475–1482 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1081-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1081-1

Keywords

Navigation