Skip to main content
Log in

Isotopic evidence to characterize the sources of sulfate ions in the carbonate aquifer system in Aleppo basin (North Syria)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sulfur and oxygen isotopic compositions of sulfate (δ34SSO4, δ18OSO4) and δ18OH2O, δ13CDIC have been used in conjunction with chemical data to constrain sulfate sources and geochemical processes in carbonate aquifers of the Aleppo basin in north Syria. The Aleppo basin comprises two limestone aquifers: the first one is shallow unconfined of Paleogene age and the second is deep confined of Upper Cretaceous age. The chemical data indicate that dissolution of carbonate and evaporites is the main process controlling groundwater quality. In the mainly unconfined modern groundwater, the wide range of δ34SSO4 values (10.39–17.6 ‰) indicates a variety of input sources. The likely sources of sulfur include meteoric precipitation and sewage waters which recharge the aquifer through Qweik River crossing the area. These waters have low SO4 2− concentration (<50 mg/L), and are associated with heavier value of δ18OH2O and high NO3 concentration (>20 mg/L). Sulfate increases in deep confined groundwater in some of which gypsum saturation is reached. The δ34SSO4 and δ18OSO4 are relatively constant with mean values of 18.5 and 13.5 ‰, respectively. This indicates that gypsum and anhydrite dissolution are the primary sources of sulfate. This water is associated with higher depleted value of δ18OH2O. The heavier δ13CDIC with mean value −1.8 ‰ and high Mg2+ concentration (~100 mg/L) in the high sulfate deep groundwater, indicates that the de-dolomitization reactions dominate along flow paths where sulfate concentrations increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Charideh A (2012) Geochemical and isotopic characterization of groundwater from shallow and deep limestone aquifers system of Aleppo basin (north Syria). Environ Earth Sci 65(4):1157–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Charideh A, Abou Zakhem B (2010a) Geochemical and isotopic characterization of groundwater from the Paleogene aquifer of the Upper Jazireh, Syria. Environ Earth Sci 59:1065–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Charideh A, Abou Zakhem B (2010b) Distribution of tritium and stable isotopes in precipitation in Syria. Hydrol Sci J 55(5):832–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andre´ L, Franceschi M, Pouchan P, Atteia O (2005) Using geochemical data and modeling to enhance the understanding of groundwater flow in a regional deep aquifer, Aquitaine Basin, south-west of France. J Hydrol 305:40–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottrell S, Tellam J, Bartlett R, Hughes A (2008) Isotopic composition of sulfate as a tracer of natural and anthropogenic influences on groundwater geochemistry in an urban sandstone aquifer, Birmingham, UK. Appl Geochem 23:2382–2394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brew G, Barazangi M, Al-Maleh AK, Sawaf T (2001) Tectonic and geologic evolution of Syria. Geo Arabic 6:573–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark ID, Fritz P (1997) Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. Lewis Publishers, New York, p 311

    Google Scholar 

  • Claypool GE, Holser WT, Kaplan IR, Sakai H, Zak I (1980) The age curves of sulfur and oxygen isotopes in marine sulfate and their mutual interpretation. Chem Geol 28:199–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley SF, Bottrell SH, McCarthy MDB, Ward J, Young B (1997) δ34S of lower carboniferous anhydrite, cumbria and its implications for barite mineralization in the northern Pennines. J Geol Soc Lond 154:597–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogramaci SS, Herczeg AL, Schiff SL, Bone Y (2001) Controls on δ34S and δ18O of dissolved sulfate in aquifers of the Murray Basin, Australia and their use as indicators of flow processes. Appl Geochem 16:475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds WM, Pl Smedley, Spiro B (1995) Controls on the geochemistry of sulphur in East Midlands Triassic aquifer, UK. Isotopes in water resources management, vol 2. IAEA, Vienna, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein S, Mayeda T (1953) Variation of 18O content of waters from natural sources. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 4:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz P, Basharmal GM, Drimmie RJ, Ibsen J, Qureshi RM (1989) Oxygen isotope exchange between sulfate and water during bacterial reduction of sulphate. Chem Geol 79:99–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfias J, Arroyo N, Aravena R (2009) Hydrochemistry and origins of mineralized waters in the Puebla aquifer system, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci 59:1065–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonfiantini R (1978) Standards for stable isotope measurements in natural compounds. Nature 271:534–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn J, Bottrell SH, Lowe DJ, Worthington SRH (2006) Deep groundwater flow and geochemical processes in limestone aquifers: evidence from thermal waters in Derbyshire, England, UK. Hydrog J 14:868–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issar A, Bathat D, Wakshal E (1988) Occurrence of secondary gypsum veins in joints in chalks in the Negev, Israel. Catena 15:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jezierski P, Szynkiewicz A, Je drysek MO (2006) Natural and anthropogenic origin sulphate in a mountainous aquatic system: S and O isotope evidences. Water Air Soil Pollut 173:81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattan Z (2002) Effects of sulphate reduction and geogenic CO2 incorporation on the determination of 14C groundwater ages—a case study of the Paleogene groundwater system in north-eastern Syria. Hydrog J 10:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattan Z, Al–Charideh A, Abou Zakhem B, Kadkoy N (2008) Using isotope techniques to assess groundwater resources in the upper Jezireh region (in Arabic). Damascus AECS-FR/FRSR 405:90

    Google Scholar 

  • Krouse HR, Coplen TB (1997) Reporting of relative sulfur isotope-ratio data. Pure Appl Chem 69:293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marfia AM, Krishnamurthy RV, Atekwana EA, Panton WF (2004) Isotopic and geochemical evolution of ground and surface waters in a karst dominated geological setting: a case study from Belize, Central America. Appl Geochem 19:937–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otero N (2004) Isotopic data (δ34S, δ18O) and statistical analysis applied to river water pollution studies: the case of the Lllobregat River. PhD Thesis University of Barcelona, 284

  • Plummer LN, Parkhurst DL, Thorstenson DC (1983) Development of reaction models for groundwater systems. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47:665–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer LN, Perstemon EC, Parkhurst DL (1994) An interactive code (NETPATH) for modeling NET geochemical reaction along a flow PATH-version 2.0: US Geological Survey Water Res. Inves Rapport 94–4169

  • Rasoul Agha W, Droubi A (1983) Water resources in the Dawwa basin. Part II, Hydrochemical and Hydro-geophysics (in Arabic), Damascus, The Arab Center for the Studies of arid zones and dry lands, (ACSAD/DM/T-37), 247

  • Sacks LA (1996) Geochemical and isotopic composition of groundwater with emphasis on sources of sulfate in the Upper Floridan Aquifer in Parts of Marion, Sumter and Citrus Counties, Florida, US Geological Survey, water-resources investigations report 95–4251

  • Sacks LA, Herman JS, Kauffman SJ (1995) Controls on high sulfate concentrations in the Upper Floridan aquifer in southwest Florida. Water Retour 31(10):2541–2551

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler S, Geyh MA, Ploethner D, Koeniger P (2012) The deep Cretaceous aquifer in the Aleppo and Steppe basin of Syria: assessment of the meteoric origin and geographic source of the groundwater. Hydrog J 20:1007–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic chemistry, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York, p 780

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-ESCWA and BGR (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia; Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe) (2013) Inventory of Shared Water Resources in western Asia. Beirut

  • Va´zquez-Sa´nchez E, Corte´s A, Jaimes Palomera R, Fritz P, Aravena R (1989) Hidrologı´a Isoto´pica de los Valles de Cuautla y Yautepec, Me´xico (Isotopic hydrology of the Cuautla and Yautepec Valleys). Geofisica Internacional 28–2:245–264

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Prof. I. Othman, Director General of AECS for the facilities submitted during this study. The author thanks the staff of PINSTECH isotope laboratory of Pakistan, the staff in the laboratory of Amman, Jordan and the staff laboratory of AECS for their cooperation in performing the isotopic and chemical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Al-Charideh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Charideh, A. Isotopic evidence to characterize the sources of sulfate ions in the carbonate aquifer system in Aleppo basin (North Syria). Environ Earth Sci 73, 127–137 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3400-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3400-9

Keywords

Navigation