Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent researches reveal that many global attempts have been made to protect water resources; however, substantial environmental concerns have not yet been sufficiently addressed. Lake Urmia in Iran is plagued by natural and anthropogenic driving forces and its water level has fallen by about 3 m below the minimum ecological water level. To deal with the divergent interests and multiple objectives associated with the lake’s water resources, a multidisciplinary and flexible approach is then required. The present research phases included: (1) determining the effective internal and external factors along with formulating strategic alternatives for reviving the lake’s water resources via strength–weakness–opportunity–threat (SWOT–TOWS) matrix; (2) prioritizing the alternatives according to sustainable development criteria via extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) technique, and (3) applying sensitivity analysis to monitor the robustness of the ranking. Representatives of the stakeholders, managers and experts participated in the process of decision making. To consider the different viewpoints and the overall possibility distributions of fuzzy numbers, three ranking procedures were developed through the extended FAHP, reflecting neutral, optimistic, and pessimistic viewpoints. According to the final prioritization, human resources management and promotion of stakeholders’ participation stood superior to the other strategic alternatives. In this framework, SWOT–TOWS analysis performed as an appropriate prerequisite to formulate practical strategies for supporting of a sustainable development vision. The extended FAHP made a valid contribution to the proposed framework and sensitivity analysis of the results proved capability of the extended FAHP as a robust tool for decision making in comprehensive water problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaspour M, Javid AH, Mirbagheri S, Ahmadi-Givi FA, Moghimi P (2012) Investigation of lake drying attributed to climate change. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(2):257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullaev I, Rakhmatullaev S (2013) Transformation of water management in Central Asia: from State-centric, hydraulic mission to socio-political control. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2879-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Adibee N, Osanloo M, Rahmanpour M (2013) Adverse effects of coal mine waste dumps on the environment and their management. Environ Earth Sci 70(4):1581–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley WM, Healy RW, LaBaugh JW, Reilly TE (2002) Flow and storage in groundwater systems. Science 296(5575):1985–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardakanian R, Zarghami M (2004) Sustainability criteria for ranking of water resources projects. First national conference on water resources management. Iranian Water Resources Association, Tehran (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryafar A, Yousefi S, Doulati Ardejani F (2013) The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Environ Earth Sci 68(8):2313–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badri MA (2001) A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems. Int J Prod Econ 72(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonissone PP (1982) A fuzzy sets based linguistic approach: theory and applications. In: Gupta MM, Sanchez E (eds) Approximate reasoning in decision analysis, North-Holland, pp 329–339

  • Bozorg Haddad O, Mariño MA (2007) Dynamic penalty function as a strategy in solving water resources combinatorial optimization problems with honey-bee optimization (HBMO) algorithm. J Hydroinformatics 9(3):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekhoven EV, Baets BD (2006) Fast and accurate center of gravity defuzzification of fuzzy systems outputs defined on trapezoidal fuzzy partitions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(7):904–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan BA, Grandgirard A, Ward JR (2010) Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 13(4):539–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, McKinney DC, Rosegrant MW (2003) Sustainability analysis for irrigation water management in the Aral Sea region. Agric Syst 76(3):1043–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calizaya A, Meixner O, Bengtsson L, Berndtsson R (2010) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for integrated water resources management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2267–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95(3):649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi SJ, Kim JH, Lee DR (2012) Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using multi-criteria decision analysis. KSCE J Civil Eng 16(2):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove WJ, Rijsberman FR (2000) World water vision: making water everybody’s business. Earthscan, London, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza R, Nagendra H (2011) Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: the Agara Lake in Bangalore, India. Environ Manage 47(5):840–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaee Fard H, Moshabbaki A, Abbasi T, Hassanpoor A (2011) Strategic management in the public sector: reflections on it’s applicability to Iranian Public Organizations. Public Organ Rev 11(4):385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delju AH, Ceylan A, Piguet E, Rebetez M (2013) Observed climate variability and change in Urmia Lake Basin, Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 111(1–2):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment of Iran (2010) Integrated management plan for Lake Urmia Basin. 1st edn. prepared in cooperation with UNEP/GEF: (www.ramsar.org/pdf/wurc/LakeUrmiaManagementPlan-I.R.Iran2010.pdf)

  • Djamali M, de Beaulieu JL, Shah-hosseini M, Andrieu-Ponel V, Ponel P, Amini A, Akhani H, Leroy SAG, Stevens L, Lahijani H, Brewer S (2008) A late Pleistocene long pollen record from Lake Urmia, NW Iran. Quat Res 69(3):413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domènech L, March H, Saurí D (2013) Degrowth initiatives in the urban water sector? A social multi-criteria evaluation of non-conventional water alternatives in Metropolitan Barcelona. J Clean Prod 38:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer RF, Forman EH (1992) Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Support Syst 8(2):99–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimanifar A, Mohebbi F (2007) Urmia Lake (Northwest Iran): a brief review. Saline Syst 3(5):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Ayala J (2012) Selecting irrigation water pricing alternatives using a multi-methodological approach. Math Comput Modell 55(3–4):861–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Ayala J, Juízo D (2011) Strategic implementation of integrated water resources management in Mozambique: an A’WOT analysis. Phys Chem Earth 36(14–15):1103–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganoulis J, Skoulikaris H, Monget JM (2008) Involving stakeholders in transboundary water resources management: the Mesta/Nestos ‘HELP’ basin. Water SA 34(4):461–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfi M, Marti LF, Bonoli A, Tondelli S (2011) Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. J Environ Manage 92(3):665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garousi V, Najafi A, Samadi A, Rasouli K, Khanaliloo B (2013) Environmental crisis in Lake Urmia, Iran: a systematic review of causes, negative consequences and possible solutions. 6th international perspectives on water resources and the environment, Izmir, Turkey, 7–9 Jan

  • Ghaheri M, Baghal-Vayjooee MH, Naziri J (1999) Lake Urmia, Iran: a summary review. Int J Salt Lake Res 8(1):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani-Aghdam M, Dinpashoh Y, Mostafaeipour A (2013) Application of factor analysis in defining drought prone areas in Lake Urmia Basin. Nat Hazards 69(1):267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golabian H (2011) Urumia Lake: hydro-ecological stabilization and permanence. In: Badescu V, Cathcart RB (eds) Macro-engineering seawater in unique environments: arid lowlands and water bodies rehabilitation, environmental science and engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 365–397

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manage 21(9):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi M, O’connell PE, Amezaga JM, Parkin G (2010) A socio-technical framework for implementing the integrated water resources (IWRM) plan in Lake Urmia Basin, Iran. BHS third international symposium: role of hydrology in managing consequences of a changing global environment, Newcastle, UK, 19–23 July

  • Hassanzadeh E, Zarghami M, Hassanzadeh Y (2012) Determining the main factors in declining the Urmia lake level by using system dynamics modeling. Water Resour Manage 26(1):129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Li X, Wang Y (2012) A new model of geo-environmental impact assessment of mining: a multiple-criteria assessment method integrating fuzzy-AHP with fuzzy synthetic ranking. Environ Earth Sci 66(1):275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbassi A, Nabi Bidhendi G, Pejman A, Esmaeili Bidhendi M (2010) Environmental impacts of desalination on the ecology of Lake Urmia. J Great Lakes Res 36(3):419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1985) Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York, p 351p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulak O, Durmusoglu B, Kahraman C (2005) Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom. J Mater Process Technol 169(3):337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai VS, Wong BK, Cheung W (2002) Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in software selection. Eur J Oper Res 137(1):134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Kwang H, Jee-Hyong L (1999) A method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7(6):677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox J, Proctor W, Russell S (2011) Structuring stakeholder participation in New Zealand’s water resource governance. Ecol Econ 70(7):1381–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon KR (1973) An overview of multiple objective decision making. In: Cochrane JL, Zeeny LM (eds), Multiple criteria decision making. The University of South Carolina Press, pp 7–31

  • Martin-Ortega J, Berbel J (2010) Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the water framework directive. Sci Total Environ 408(19):3990–3997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencio A, Folch A, Mas-Pla J (2010) Analyzing hydrological sustainability through water balance. Environ Manage 45(5):1175–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergias I, Moustakas K, Papadopoulos A, Loizidou M (2007) Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus. J Hazard Mater 147(3):706–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison A, Siems S, Manton M, Nazarov A (2009) On the analysis of a cloud seeding data set over Tasmania. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(6):1267–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muro M, Jeffrey P (2012) Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-04476-170103

  • Nazari A, Salarirad MM, Aghajani-Bazzazi A (2012) Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method. Environ Earth Sci 65(6):1631–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozyavas A, Khan SD (2012) The driving forces behind the Caspian Sea mean water level oscillations. Environ Earth Sci 65(6):1821–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos GP, Bathrellos GD, Skilodimou HD, Martsouka FA (2012) Mapping urban water demands using multi-criteria analysis and GIS. Water Resour Manage 26(5):1347–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires A, Chang N, Martinho G (2011) An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setubal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour Conserv Recycl 56(1):7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran L, Lu X (2013) Redressing China’s strategy of water resource exploitation. Environ Manage 51(3):503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Karami E (2008) A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environ Dev Sustain 10(4):407–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman F, Rolander N, Fernández MG, Bras BA, Allen JK, Mistree F, Chastang P, Dépincé P, Bennis F (2004) Selection without reflection is a risky business… 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Albany, New York, USA, Paper Number: AIAA-2004-4429, August 30–September 1

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York, p 287

    Google Scholar 

  • Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma R (1998) Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. Eur J Oper Res 104(3):485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sa-nguanduan N, Nititvattananon V (2011) Strategic decision making for urban water reuse application: a case from Thailand. Desalination 268(1–3):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Davraz A (2013) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake Basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 21(3):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Singai CB, Srivastava S, Sivam S (2009) Inclusive water governance: a global necessity. lessons from India. Transit Stud Rev 16(2):598–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B, Medeiros YDP (2008) Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour Manage 22(7):877–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), GEAS (Global Environmental Alert Service) (2012) The drying of Iran’s Lake Urmia and its environmental consequences. Environ Dev 2(1):128–137. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.011

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nation (UN) (2004) Guidelines on strategic planning and management of water resources, environment and development division, New York, USA. http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/ppp/files/guideline_spm.pdf

  • Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1–3):199–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weihrich H (1982) The TOWS matrix: tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan 15(2):54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang CC, Chen BS (2004) Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. J Chin Inst Ind Eng 21(6):543–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XL, Ding JH, Hou H (2013) Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis. Nat Hazards 68(2):657–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz B, Harmancioglu NB (2010) Multi-criteria decision making for water resource management: a case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey. Water SA 36(5):568–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M (2011) Effective watershed management; case study of Urmia Lake, Iran. Lake Reserv Manag 27(1):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2011) Multicriteria analysis: applications to water and environment management. Springer, Berlin, p 195

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q (2009) The south-to-north water transfer project of China: environmental implications and monitoring strategy. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(5):1238–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Ali Azarnivand, Farkhondeh Sadat Hashemi-Madani & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib

Authors
  1. Ali Azarnivand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farkhondeh Sadat Hashemi-Madani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Azarnivand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azarnivand, A., Hashemi-Madani, F.S. & Banihabib, M.E. Extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in water and environmental management (case study: Lake Urmia Basin, Iran). Environ Earth Sci 73, 13–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3391-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3391-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation