Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of electrode configuration on pH distribution and heavy metal ions migration during soil electrokinetic remediation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generation, migration, and distribution of H+ and OH have remarkable influence on heavy metal removal from soil during electrokinetic remediation. A series of experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of electrode configuration and voltage on pH distribution and heavy metal migration, based on the preliminary exploratory experiments. In the first phase, three soil samples were used to observe the effect of electrode configuration on pH distribution. Then, three more soil samples were used to explore the effect of voltage on ion migration. Finally, three other soil samples were used to explore the effect of electrode configuration (i.e. angle CAC) on pH distribution and heavy metal migration. The results showed that the soil was divided into acid, base, and pH-jump zones and that heavy metals migrated under low pH conditions and were deposited at the pH-jump zone. Heavy metal distribution was fairly consistent with pH distribution. Under the optimal condition of \( \angle \)CAC 60º and voltage 2.33 V/cm, 4.22 mg copper and 0.51 mg zinc migrated from acid zone and deposited in pH-jump zone with 6.44 kJ energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27:2638–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshakabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, Bricka M, Parker MR (1995) Electrokinetic remediation: basics and technology status. J Hazard Mater 40:117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-hamdan AZ, Reddy KR (2008) Transient behavior of heavy metals in soils during electrokinetic remediation. Chemosphere 71:860–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeira J, Peng CS, Wang ZY (2009) Effect of different electrode configurations on the migration of copper ions during the electrokinetic remediation process. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 4:581–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeira J, Peng CS, Li PP (2010) Effect of electrode configuration on the distribution of Cu during electrokinetic soil remediation. J Korean Soc Urban Environ 10:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermea OM, Alvarez EH, Hernandez GG, Romero F (2009) Assessment of heavy metal pollution in urban topsoils from the metropolitan area of Mexico city. J Geochem Explor 101:218–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Zheng Y, Lei M, Huang Z, Wu H, Chen H, Fan K, Yu K, Wu X, Tian Q (2005) Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere 60:542–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangi JP, Richard D (1997) Heavy metal soil pollution cartography in northern France. Sci Total Environ 205:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gent DB, Bricka RM, Alshawabkeh AN, Larson SL, Fabian G, Granade S (2004) Bench-and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. J Hazard Mater 110:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannis A, Gidarakos E (2005) Washing enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal cadmium for real contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater B123:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao X, Zhou D, Huang D, Cang L, Zhang H, Wang H (2009) Heavy metal transfer from soil to vegetable in southern Jiangsu Province, China. Pedosphere 19:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung MC, Thornton I (1996) Heavy metal contamination of soils and plants in the vicinity of a lead-zinc mine, Korea. Appl Geochem 11:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasassi A, Rakimbei P, Karagiannidis A, Zabaniotou A, Tsiouvaras K, Nastis A, Tzafeifopoulou K (2008) Soil contamination by heavy metals: measurements from a closed unlined landfill. Bioresour Technol 99:8578–8584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsh DJ, Parsons MW (1997) Department of energy sites suitable for electrokinetic remediation. J Hazard Mater 55:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Yang J (2000) A new method to control electrolytes pH by circulation system in electrokinetic soil remediation. J Hazard Mater B 77:227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yu J, Neretnieks I (1996) A new approach to electrokinetic remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals. J Contam Hydrol 22:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Poon C, Liu P (2001) Heavy metal contamination of urban soils and street dusts in Hongkong. Appl Geochem 16:1361–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Luo Y, Su Z (2007) Heavy metal concentrations in soils and plant accumulation in a restored manganese mineland in Guangxi, South China. Environ Pollut 147:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch RJ, Muntoni A, Ruggeri R, Winfield KC (2007) Preliminary tests of an electrokinetic barrier to prevent heavy metal pollution of soils. Electrochem Acta 52:3432–3440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng C, Meng H, Zhang J, Lu S (2003) Treatment of electroplating wastewater. J Univ Sci Technol B10:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RW (1999) Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 66:151–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puppala SK, Alshawabkeh AN, Acar YB, Gale RJ, Bricka M (1997) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of high sorption capacity soils. J Hazard Mater 55:203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawada A, Tanaka S, Fukushima M, Tatsumi K (2003) Electrokinetic remediation of clayey soils containing copper(II)-oxinate using humic acid as a surfactant. J Hazard Mater B 96:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z, Chen X, Jia J, Qu L, Wang W (2007) Comparison of electrokinetic soil remediation methods using one fixed anode and approaching anodes. Environ Pollut 150:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turera D, Genc A (2005) Assessing effect of electrode configuration on the efficiency of electrokinetic remediation by sequential extraction analysis. J Hazard Mater B 119:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verner JF, Ramsey MH (1996) Heavy metal contamination of soils around a Pb-Zn smelter in Bukowno, Poland. Appl Geochem 11:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa P (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview. Sci Total Environ 289:97–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan C, Chiang T (2008) Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic spiked soil by chemical reagents. J Hazard Mater 152:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou D, Deng C, Cang L, Alshawabkeh AN (2005) Electrokinetic remediation of a Cu–Zn contaminated red soil by controlling the voltage and conditioning catholyte pH. Chemosphere 61:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project, Ministry of Education of China (NO. 708060), Special Funds for Environmental Nonprofit Research Project (200809095) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, SEM, China (NCET-08-0508).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changsheng Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, C., Almeira, J.O. & Gu, Q. Effect of electrode configuration on pH distribution and heavy metal ions migration during soil electrokinetic remediation. Environ Earth Sci 69, 257–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1953-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1953-z

Keywords

Navigation