Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entropy-based particle swarm optimization with clustering analysis on landslide susceptibility mapping

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generation of landslide susceptibility maps is important for engineering geologists and geomorphologists. The goal of this study is to generate a reliable susceptibility map based on digital elevation modeling and remote sensing data through clustering technique. This study focused on the landslide problems on a vast area located at Shei Pa National Park, Miao Li, Taiwan. Two stages of analysis were used to extract the dominant attributes and thresholds: (1) calculate the entropy with regard to the measure of influenced variables to the occurrence of landslide and (2) use the clustering analysis K-means with particle swarm optimization (KPSO) to resolve the difficulties in creating landslide susceptibility maps. The knowledge scope with regard to core factors and thresholds are solved. The self-organization map (SOM) is used as a parallel study for comparison. The overall accuracy of the susceptibility map is 86 and 77 % for KPSO and SOM, respectively. Then, the susceptibility maps are drawn and verifications made. The generation of a susceptibility map is useful for decision makers and managers to handle the landslide risk area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeza C, Lantada N, Moya J (2010) Validation and evaluation of two multivariate statistical models for predictive shallow landslide susceptibility mapping of the Eastern Pyrenees. Environ Earth Sci 61(3):507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barredo JI, Benavides A, Hervas J, Van Westen CJ (2000) Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Trijana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. JAG 2(1):9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswajeet P, Saied P (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Adv 3 (2):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Caine M (1980) The rainfall intensity: duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows Geografiska Annaler. Ser A Phys Geogr 62(1/2):23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process Landf 28:1125–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L, Critelli S, Gulla G, Di Nocera S (1991) A methodological approach to landslide hazard assessment: a case history. In: Proceedings of 16th international landslide conference at Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 899–904

  • Chen C, Tianxiang Y (2010) A method of DEM construction and related error analysis. Comp Geosci 36(6):717–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-Y, Ye F (2003) K-means algorithm based on particle swarm optimization. In: 2003 International conference on informatics, cybernetics, and systems, I-Shou University, Taiwan, ROC, pp 1470–1475

  • Dai FC, Lee FC (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati L, Turrini MC (2002) An objective method to rank the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina;Perugia, Italy). Eng Geol 63:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (North of Yenice, NWTurkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41:720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub GH, Heath M, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21(2):215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang PC, Wan S, Yen JY (2008) A novel method of searching appropriate ranges of base isolation design parameters through entropy-based classification. Struct Control Health Monit. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/108567152/issue. doi:10.1002/stc.259

  • Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36(7):1897–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1981) Mountain hazard mapping in Nepal: introduction to an applied mountain research project. Mount Res Dev 1(3–4):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keaton JR, Degraff JV (1996) Surface observation and geologic mapping. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board Special Report 247, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 178–230

  • Khazai B, Sitar N (2003) Evaluation of factors controlling earthquake-induced landslides caused by Chi-Chi earthquake and comparison with the Northridge and Loma Prieta events. Eng Geol 71:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi R (1995) A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol 2, issue 12. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 1137–1143

  • Koua EL, Maceachren A, Kraak M-J (2006) Evaluating the usability of visualization methods in an exploratory geovisualization environment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(4):425–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Process Landf 28:1361–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei TC, Wan S, Chou TY (2007) The comparison of PCA and discrete rough set method for feature extraction of remote sensing image classification—a case study on rice classification, Taiwan. Comput Geosci 12(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei TC, Wan S, Chou TY, Hung CP (2010) The knowledge expression on debris flow potential analysis through PCA + LDA and rough sets theory: a case study of Chen-Yu-Lan watershed, Nantou, Taiwan. Environ Earth Sci 63(5):981–997. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s12665-010-0775-0

  • Leroi E (1996) Landslide hazard-risk maps at different scales: objectives, tools and developments. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium on landslides, Trondheim, vol 1, pp 35–52

  • Lin WT (2008) Earthquake-induced landslide hazard monitoring and assessment using SOM and PROMETHEE techniques: a case study at the Chiufenershan area in Central Taiwan. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(9):995–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CY, Lo HM, Chou WC, Lin WT (2004) Vegetation recovery assessment at the Jou-Jou Mountain landslide area caused by the 921 Earthquake in Central Taiwan. Ecol Model 176:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj R (1993) Landslide processes and landslide susceptibility analysis from an upland watershed: a case study from St. Andrew, Jamaica, West Indies. Eng Geol 34:53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama T, Kawachi T, Singh VP (2005) Entropy-based assessment and clustering of potential water resources availability. J Hydrol 309:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noferini L, Pieraccini M, Mecatti D, Macaluso G, Luzi G, Atzeni C (2006) Long term landslide monitoring by ground-based synthetic aperture radar interferometer. Int J Remote Sens 27(10):1893–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh H-J, Lee S, Soedradjat GM (2009) Quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping at Pemalang area, Indonesia. Environ Earth Sci 60(6):1317–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Ahn SC, Choi JK, Lee S (2010) Sensitivity analysis for the GIS-based mapping of the ground subsidence hazard near abandoned underground coal mines. Earth Sci 64(2):347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69(3–4):331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes. Eng Geol 32:81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Mather PM (2003) An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 86(4):554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45(10):1244–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2011) Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):329–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Buchroithner MF (2010) Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosci 16(2):107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupke J, Cammeraat E, Seijmonsbergen AC, Van Westen CJ (1988) Engineering geomorphology of the Widentobel catchment, Switzerland: a geomorphological inventory system applied to geotechnical appraisal of the slope stability. Eng Geol 26:33–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi G (2006) Segment boundary detection via class entropy measurements in connectionist phoneme recognition. Speech Commun 48:1666–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santacana N, De Paz A, Baeza B, Corominas J, Marturi J (2003) A GIS based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Nat Hazards 30(3):281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma P, Louis JD, Khalid A, Wen HC (2006) Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model updating. Comput Geosci 10(1):3–36. http://www.springerlink.com/content/rxxm3x6765823164

  • Schowengerdt RA (1997) Remote sensing, models and methods for image processing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Selim SZ, Ismail MA (1984) K-means type algorithms: a generalized convergence theorem and characterization of local optimality. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer EA, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Exp Syst Appl 38(7):8208–8219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423, 623–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Soeters RS, Van Westen CJ (1996) Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, Special Report, vol 247. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 129–177

  • Stewart RN, Purucker TS (2011) An environmental decision support system for spatial assessment and selective remediation. Environ Model Softw 26(6):751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangestani MH (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using the fuzzy gamma approach in a GIS, Kakan catchment area, southwest Iran. Aust J Earth Sci 51(3):439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Terlien MTJ (1997) Prediction of the occurrence of slope instability phenomena through GIS based hazard zonation. Geol Rundsch 86:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorko A, Jovic F (2000) Multiple attribute entropy classification of school-age injuries. Accid Anal Prevent 32:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S (2009) A spatial decision support system for extracting the core factors and thresholds for landslide susceptibility map. Eng Geol 108:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC (2009) A knowledge-based decision support system to analyze the debris-flow problems at Chen-Yu-Lan River, Taiwan. Knowl Based Syst 2(8):580–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Huang PC, Chou TY (2008) Knowledge rules of debris flow event: a case study for investigation ChenYu Lan River, Taiwan. Eng Geol 98:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Chou TY (2009) A novel data mining technique of analysis and classification for landslide problems. Nat Hazards 52:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Chou TY (2012) A landslide expert system: image classification through integration of data mining approaches for multi-category analysis. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:747–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward TJ, Ruh-Ming L, Simons DB (1982) Mapping landslide hazard in forest watershed. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 108(GT-2):319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinsona PL, Anderson MG, Lloyda DM, Renaud J-P (2002) Landslide hazard and bioengineering: towards providing improved decision support through integrated numerical model development. Environ Model Softw 17(4):333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye F, Chen CY (2005) Alternative KPSO-clustering algorithm. Tamkang J Sci Eng 8(2):165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61:821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerger A (2002) Examining GIS decision utility for natural hazard risk modelling. Environ Model Softw 17(3):287–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to express gratitude to the Director Dr. Chou of the GIS Research Center, Fang Chia University, for providing all the relevant data on the Shei-Pa National Park in Taiwan. National Science Council (98-2625-M-275-001 and 100-2410-H-275-009) also sponsored this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiuan Wan.

Additional information

This work was submitted to Environmental Geology. A study performed by National Science Council Research Project: 98-2625-M-275-001 and 100-2410-H-275-009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wan, S. Entropy-based particle swarm optimization with clustering analysis on landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Earth Sci 68, 1349–1366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1832-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1832-7

Keywords

Navigation