Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study considers landslide susceptibility mapping by means of frequency ratio and artificial neural network approaches using geographic information system (GIS) techniques as a basic analysis tool. The selected study area was that of the Panchthar district, Nepal. GIS was used for the management and manipulation of spatial data. Landslide locations were identified from field survey and aerial photographic interpretation was used for location of lineaments. Ten factors in total are related to the occurrence of landslides. Based on the same set of factors, landslide susceptibility maps were produced from frequency ratio and neural network models, and were then compared and evaluated. The weights of each factor were determined using the back-propagation training method. Landslide susceptibility maps were produced from frequency ratio and neural network models, and they were then compared by means of their checking. The landslide location data were used for checking the results with the landslide susceptibility maps. The accuracy of the landslide susceptibility maps produced by the frequency ratio and neural networks is 82.21 and 78.25%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akgün A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Tatnall ARL (1997) Introduction to neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 18:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barredo JJ, Benavides A, Hervas J, Van Westen CJ (2000) Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Trijana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 2:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists, modeling with GIS. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabb EE, Pampeyan EH, Bonilla MG (1972) Landslide susceptibility in San Mateo County, California, Misc Field Studies Map MF360. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A (1983) Multivariate methods for landslide hazard evaluation. Math Geol 15:403–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process 16:427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Franttini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:1125–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett J (1994) Where and why artificial neural networks are applicable in civil engineering. J Comput Civil Eng 8:129–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard J (1994) The landslide hazard in the Himalayas: geological control and human action. Geomorphology 10:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard J, Gardner R (2000) Relationships between rainfall and landsliding in the Middle hills. Nepal Norsk Geogr Tidsskr 54:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther A (2003) SLOPEMAP: programs for automated mapping of geometrical and kinematical properties of hard rock hill slopes. Comput Geosci 29:865–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther A, Carstensen A, Pohl W (2004) Automated sliding susceptibility mapping of hard rock hillslopes. Nat Hazard Earth System Sci 4:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrarra A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa S, Dahal RK, Yamanaka M, Bhandari NP, Yatabe R, Inagaki H (2009) Causes of large landslides in the Lesser Himalaya of central Nepal. Environ Geol 57:1423–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuberger H, Masch L, Preuss E, Schrocker A (1984) Quaternary landslides and rock fusion in central Nepal and in the Tyrolean Alps. Mt Res Dev 4:345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines ML, Carnevale NT (1997) The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput 9:1179–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1981) Mountain hazards mapping in Nepal: introduction to an applied mountain research project. Mt Res Dev 1:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jade S, Sarkar S (1993) Statistical models for slope stability classification. Eng Geol 36:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laban P (1979) Landslide occurrence in Nepal, HMG/FAO and UNDP. Ministry of Forest, Department of Soil Conservation, Integrated Watershed Management, Kathmandu, 27 pp

  • Lamelas MT, Marinoni O, Hoppe A, Riva J (2008) Doline probability map using logistic regression and GIS technology in the central Ebro Basin (Spain). Environ Geol 54:963–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2007) Comparison of landslide susceptibility maps generated through multiple logistic regression for three test areas in Korea. Earth Surf Proc Land 32:2133–2148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Dan NT (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ Geol 48:778–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50:847–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47:982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2002) Landslide susceptibility analysis and verification using the Bayesian probability model. Environ Geol 43:120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Lee MJ, Won JS (2003a) Landslide susceptibility analysis using artificial neural network at Boeun, Korea. Environ Geol 44:820–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003b) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Land 27:1361–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boeun, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 25:2037–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Physical basis of length–slope factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Wilson JP (1992) Length–slope factors for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation: simplified method of estimation. J Soil Water Conserv 47:423–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paola JD, Schowengerdt RA (1995) A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely sensed multi-spectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 16:3033–3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal CP (2000) Geological studies in the southern part of Taplejung Window, Eastern Nepal and engineering geological studies around Phidim Bazaar. Dissertation, Tribhuvan University

  • Rengers N, Van Westen CJ, Chaco’n J, Irigaray C (1998) Draft for the chapter on the application of digital techniques for natural hazard zonation. Report on mapping of natural hazards, International Association of Engineering Geology, Commission no.1 on Engineering Geological Mapping, Culshaw and Marker, Vancouver

  • Rupke J, Cammeraat E, Seijmonsbergen AC, Van Westen CJ (1988) Engineering geomorphology of the Widentobel catchment, Apenzell and Sankt Gallen, Switzerland: a geomorphological inventory system applied to geotechnical appraisal of slope stability. Eng Geol 26:33–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby MJ (1988) Landforms and denudation of the High Himalaya of Nepal: results of continental collision. Z Geomorphol Neue Folge 69:133–152 (supplement band)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang Y, Yang Z, Li L, Liu D, Liao Q, Wang Y (2003) A super large landslide in Tibet in 2000: background, occurrence, disaster, and origin. Eng Geol 54:225–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Shroder JF, Bishop MP (1998) Mass movement in the Himalaya: new insights and research directions. Geomorphology 26:13–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh TN, Kanchan R, Verma AK, Singh S (2003) An intelligent approach for prediction of triaxial properties using unconfined uniaxial strength. Min Eng J 5:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45:665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunusluoglu MC, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2008) Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ Geol 54:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upreti BN, Dhital MR (1996) Landslide studies and management in Nepal. ICIMOD, Nepal, p 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Upreti BN, Le Fort P (1999) Lesser Himalayan Crystalline Nappes of Nepal: problem of their origin. Geol Soc Am Bull, Special Issue 328:225–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ (1994) GIS in landslide hazard zonation: a review, with examples from the Andes of Colombia. In: Price MF, Heywood DI (eds) Mountain environments and geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 135–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ (2000) The modeling of landslide hazards using GIS. Surv Geophys 21:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Lulie GF (2003) Analyzing the evolution of the Tessina landslide using aerial photographs and digital elevation models. Geomorphology 54:77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO, France, pp 1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (1983) The principal geological factors leading to landslides in the foothills of Nepal: a statistical study of 100 landslides-steps for mapping the risk of landslides. HELVETAS-Swiss Technical Cooperation and ITECO-Company for International Cooperation and Development, unpublished 58 pp

  • Ward TJ, Ruh-Ming L, Simons DB (1982) Mapping landslide hazard in forest watershed. J Geotech Eng Div 108(GT-2):319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2007) GIS based susceptibility mapping of krast depression in gypsum: a case study from Sivas basin (Turkey). Eng Geol 90:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I, Yildirim M (2006) Structural and geomorphological aspects of the Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey), and susceptibility mapping by means of GIS. Environ Geol 50:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W (1999) Verification of the nonparametric characteristics of backpropagation neural networks for image classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 37:771–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Research Project of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Knowledge and Economy of Korea. We thank Mr. Surya P. Poudel for the landslide data collection in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Chungnam National University, Gung-Dong, Yusung-Gu, Daejeon, 305-764, Korea

    Chandra Prakash Poudyal & Chandong Chang

  2. Geoscience Information Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 92 Gwahang-no, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-350, Korea

    Hyun-Joo Oh & Saro Lee

Authors
  1. Chandra Prakash Poudyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chandong Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hyun-Joo Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saro Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saro Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poudyal, C.P., Chang, C., Oh, HJ. et al. Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci 61, 1049–1064 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0426-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0426-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation