Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Physical Activity of Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Background

The assessment of physical activity levels of hospitalised older people requires accurate and reliable measures. Physical activities that older people in hospital commonly engage in include exercises and walking. Measurement of physical activity levels of older inpatients is essential to evaluate the impact of interventions to improve physical activity levels and to determine associations between physical activity in hospital and other health-related outcome measures.

Objective

To determine which measures are used to measure physical activity of older people in hospital, and to describe their properties and applications.

Method

A systematic review of four databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and AMED was conducted for papers published from 1996 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were participants aged ≥ 65 years and studies which included measures of physical activity in the acute medical inpatient setting. Studies which specifically assessed the activity levels of surgical patients or patients with neurological conditions such as stroke or brain injury were excluded. All study designs were included in the review.

Results

18 studies were included from 127 articles selected for full review. 15 studies used objective measures to measure the physical activity of older inpatients: 11 studies used accelerometers and four used direct systematic observations. Seven accelerometers were identified including the StepWatch Activity Monitor, activPAL, GENEActiv, Kenz Lifecorder EX, Actiwatch-L, Tractivity and AugmenTech Inc. Pittsburgh accelerometer. Three studies used a subjective measure (interviews with nurses and patients) to classify patients into low, intermediate and high mobility groups. The StepWatch Activity Monitor was reported to be most accurate at step-counting in patients with slow gait speed or altered gait. The activPAL was reported to be highly accurate at classifying postures.

Conclusion

Physical activity levels of older inpatients can be measured using accelerometers. The accuracy of the accelerometers varies between devices and population-specific validation studies are needed to determine their suitability in measuring physical activity levels of hospitalised older people. Subjective measures are less accurate but can be a practical way of measuring physical activity in a larger group of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Appendix

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lafont C, Gerard S, Voisin T, et al. Reducing «iatrogenic disability» in the hospitalized frail elderly. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2011;15(8):645–660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown CJ, Redden DT, Flood KL, et al. The underrecognized epidemic of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009;57(9):1660–1665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodilsen A, Pedersen M, Petersen J. Acute Hospitalization of the Older Patient. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2013;92:789–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher S, Goodwin J, Protas EJ, et al. Ambulatory Activity of Older Adults Hospitalized with Acute Medical Illness. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2011;59(1):91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caspersen C, Powell K, Christenson G. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public health reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974). 1985;100(2):126–131.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pahor M, Guralnik JM, Ambrosius WT, et al. Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adults: The life study randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(23):2387–2396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown CJ, Friedkin RJ, Inouye SK. Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2004;52(8):1263–1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zisberg A, Shadmi E, Sinoff G, et al. Low mobility during hospitalization and functional decline in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2011;59(2):266–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kosse NM, Dutmer AL, Dasenbrock L, et al. Effectiveness and feasibility of early physical rehabilitation programs for geriatric hospitalized patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 2013;13:107–107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown CJ, Foley KT, Lowman JD, et al. Comparison of posthospitalization function and community mobility in hospital mobility program and usual care patients a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2016;176(7):921–927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martínez-Velilla N, Cadore EL, Casas-Herrero Á, et al. Physical activity and early rehabilitation in hospitalized elderly medical patients: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2016;20(7):738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DiPietro L. The epidemiology of physical activity and physical function in older people. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1996;28(5):596–600.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Colbert LH, Matthews CE, Havighurst TC, et al. Comparative validity of physical activity measures in older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011;43(5):867–876.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassett DR, Dinesh J. Use of pedometers and accelerometers in clinical populations: validity and reliability issues. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2010;15(3):135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1998;52(6):377–384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rowlands AV, Olds TS, Hillsdon M, et al. Assessing sedentary behavior with the geneactiv: Introducing the sedentary sphere. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2014;46(6):1235–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher SR, Graham JE, Brown CJ, et al. Factors that differentiate level of ambulation in hospitalised older adults. Age and ageing. 2012;41(1):107–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher SR, Kuo YF, Graham JE, et al. Early ambulation and length of stay in older adults hospitalized for acute illness. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2010;170(21):1942–1943.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ostir GV, Berges IM, Kuo YF, et al. Mobility activity and its value as a prognostic indicator of survival in hospitalized older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2013;61(4):551–557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Taraldsen K, Askim T, Sletvold O, et al. Evaluation of a Body-Worn Sensor System to Measure Physical Activity in Older People With Impaired Function. Physical Therapy. 2011;91(2):277–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pedersen MM, Bodilsen AC, Petersen J, et al. Twenty-four-hour mobility during acute hospitalization in older medical patients. Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences. 2012;68(3):331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vinzio S, Ruellan A, Perrin A, et al. Actigraphic assessment of the circadian restactivity rhythm in elderly patients hospitalized in an acute care unit. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2003;57(1):53–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sallis R, Roddy-Sturm Y, Chijioke E, et al. Stepping toward discharge: Level of ambulation in hospitalized patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2015;10(6):384–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Izawa KP, Watanabe S, Oka K, et al. Differences in daily in-hospital physical activity and geriatric nutritional risk index in older cardiac inpatients: preliminary results. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2014;26(6):599–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mudge AM, Giebel AJ, Cutler AJ. Exercising body and mind: An integrated approach to functional independence in hospitalized older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(4):630–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boltz M, Resnick B, Capezuti E, et al. Functional Decline in Hospitalized Older Adults: Can Nursing Make a Difference? Geriatric Nursing. 2012;33(4):272–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Doherty-King B, Yoon JY, Pecanac K, et al. Frequency and duration of nursing care related to older patient mobility. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2013;46(1):20–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mudge AM, McRae P, McHugh K, et al. Poor mobility in hospitalized adults of all ages. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2016;11(4):289–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cavanaugh JT, Coleman KL, Gaines JM, et al. Using Step Activity Monitoring to Characterize Ambulatory Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007;55(1):120–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Storti KL, Pettee KK, Brach JS, et al. Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2008;40(1):59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bergman RJ, Bassett DR, Muthukrishnan S, et al. Validity of 2 devices for measuring steps taken by older adults in assisted-living facilities. Journal of physical activity & health. 2008;5 Suppl 1:S166–S175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Foster RC, Lanningham-Foster LM, et al. Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure. Preventive Medicine. 2005;41(3–4):778–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Storti KL, Pettee KK, Brach JS, et al. Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2008;40(1):59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McDonald CM, Widman LM, Walsh DD, et al. Use of step activity monitoring for continuous physical activity assessment in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(4):802–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bjornson KF, Belza B, Kartin D, et al. Ambulatory Physical Activity Performance in Youth With Cerebral Palsy and Youth Who Are Developing Typically. Physical Therapy. 2007;87(3):248–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sandroff BM, Motl RW, Pilutti LA, et al. Accuracy of StepWatch™ and ActiGraph accelerometers for measuring steps taken among persons with multiple sclerosis. PloS one. 2014;9(4):e93511–e93511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Mudge S, Stott NS, Walt SE. Criterion validity of the StepWatch Activity Monitor as a measure of walking activity in patients after stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2007;88(12):1710–1715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wendland DM, Sprigle SH. Activity monitor accuracy in persons using canes. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2012;49(8):1261–1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Grant PM, Dall PM, Mitchell SL, et al. Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults. Journal of aging and physical activity. 2008;16(2):201–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Landry GJ, Falck RS, Beets MW, et al. Measuring physical activity in older adults: calibrating cut-points for the MotionWatch 8. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2015;7:165.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Koizumi D, Rogers NL, Rogers ME, et al. Efficacy of an accelerometer-guided physical activity intervention in community-dwelling older women. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(4):467–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crouter S, Schneider P, Karabulut M, et al. Validity of 10 Electronic Pedometers for Measuring Steps, Distance, and Energy Cost. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2003;35(8):1455–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zisberg A, Shadmi E, Gur-Yaish N, et al. Hospital-Associated Functional Decline: The Role of Hospitalization Processes Beyond Individual Risk Factors. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2015;63(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Graham E, Fisher SR, Berges I-m, et al. Walking Speed Threshold for Classifying Walking Independence in Hospitalized Older Adults. Physical Therapy. 2010;90(11):1591–1598.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. McKenzie TL. The use of direct observation to assess physical activity. In: welk G, ed. Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research: Human Kinetics; 2002:179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sallis JF, Saelens BE. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2000;71(2 Suppl):S1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2003;37(3):197–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Esliger DW, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, et al. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(6):1085–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Phillips LRS, Parfitt G, Rowlands AV. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2013;16(2):124–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang S, Murray P, Zillmer R, et al. Activity classification using the GENEA: optimum sampling frequency and number of axes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2228–2234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang S, Rowlands AV, Murray P, et al. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(4):742–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, et al. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006;40(12):992–997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Lyden K, Kozey Keadle SL, et al. Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2243–2252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Brown CJ, Roth DL, Allman RM. Validation of use of wireless monitors to measure levels of mobility during hospitalization. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2008;45:551–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Levine B, Moyles T, Roehrs J, et al. Actigraphic monitoring and polygraphic recording in determination of sleep and wake. Sleep Research. 1986;15:247.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cole R, Kripke D, Gruen W, et al. Automatc sleep/wake identification from wrist actigraphy. 1992. 1992;15:461–469.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Lukajic O, et al. Accuracy and Reliability of 10 Pedometers for Measuring Steps over a 400-m Walk. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2003;35(10):1779–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kuys SS, Dolecka UE, Guard A. Activity level of hospital medical inpatients: An observational study. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2012;55(2):417–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kramer SF, Cumming T, Churilov L, et al. Measuring Activity Levels at an Acute Stroke Ward: Comparing Observations to a Device. BioMed Research International. 2013;2013:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Academic Geriatric Medicine, Southampton, UK

    Stephen E. R. Lim, K. Ibrahim, A. A. Sayer & H. C. Roberts

  2. NIHR CLAHRC: Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Stephen E. R. Lim, K. Ibrahim, A. A. Sayer & H. C. Roberts

  3. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

    Stephen E. R. Lim & H. C. Roberts

  4. Ageing, Geriatrics & Epidemiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

    A. A. Sayer

  5. NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre in Ageing and Chronic Disease, Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    A. A. Sayer

  6. University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK

    Stephen E. R. Lim

Authors
  1. Stephen E. R. Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. A. Sayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. C. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen E. R. Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, S.E.R., Ibrahim, K., Sayer, A.A. et al. Assessment of Physical Activity of Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J Nutr Health Aging 22, 377–386 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0931-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0931-2

Key words

Search

Navigation