Skip to main content
Log in

Agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the MNA in hospitalized elderly

  • Body Mass Index, Calf Circumference, Arm Circumference, Habitual Energy Intake and the MNA
  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and then assess the accuracy of these parameters in relation to the MNA.

Method

The nutritional status of 132 hospitalized elderly was assessed with the MNA, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (CC) and arm circumference (AC). Their habitual energy intake (HEI) was also determined. The chi-square and the Mann-Whitney tests were used. The agreement between the nutritional risk criteria and the MNA was determined by the Kappa coefficient. The ROC curve was used to determine the accuracy of the parameters in relation to the MNA and to determine the cut-off values. The significance level was set at 5% (p<0.05).

Results

A little more than half the sample (54.5%) was well nourished, 34.9% were at risk of malnutrition and 10.6% were malnourished. There was good agreement only for BMI<22 (Kappa=0.44), with an accuracy (AUC) of 0.78. No agreement was found for the other parameters, their sensitivities were shown to be low. However, CC and AC were very specific for determining the well nourished patients: the CC specificity was 86.1% and AC specificity was 94.4%. The cutoff values determined by the ROC curve were ≤23.2 for BMI, ≤26.2 for AC and ≤32.2 for CC.

Conclusion

The best parameters to determine nutritional risk in relation to the MNA were AC, BMI and CC. However, these nutritional assessment parameters should be used to replace the MNA for the assessment of hospitalized elderly patients with their current cut-off points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oliveira MRM, Fogaça KCP, Leandro-Merhi VA. Nutritional status and functional capacity of hospitalized elderly. Nutrition Journal 2009; 8:54. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-8-54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldblum I, German L, Castel H, Harman-Boehm I, Bilenko N, Eisinger M, Fraser D, Shahar DR. Characteristics of undernourished older medical patients and the identification of predictors for undernutrition status. Nutrition Journal 2007;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-6-37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stratton RJ, King CL, Stroud MA, Jackson AA, Elia M. “Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool” predicts mortality and length of hospital stay in acutely ill elderly. Br J Nutr 2006; 95:325–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Persson MD, Brismar KE, Katzarski KS, Nordenstrom J, Cederholm TE. Nutritional status using mini nutritional assessment and subjective global assessment predict mortality in geriatric patients. J Am Geriatric Soc 2002; 50:1996–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saka B, Kaya O, Ozturk GB, Erten N, Karan MA. Malnutrition in the elderly and its relationship with other geriatric syndromes. Clinical Nutrition 2010; doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2010.04.006, in press.

  6. Volkert D, Saeglitz C, Gueldenzoph H, Sieber CC, Stehle P. Undiagnosed malnutrition and nutrition-related problems in geriatric patients. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2010; 14(5):387–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini nutritional assessment: A practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Facts and Research in Gerontology 1994; Supplement (2):15–59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuyac Lantigua M, Santana Porbén S. The Mini Nutritional Assessment of the elderly in the practice of a hospital geriatrics service: inception, validation and operational characteristics. Arch Latinoam Nutr 2007; 54(3):255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira LS, Nascimento LF, Marucci MF. Use of the mini nutritional assessment tool in elderly people from long-term institutions of southeast of Brazil. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2008; 12(3):213–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cereda E, Valzolgher L, Pedrolli C. Mini nutritional assessment is a good predictor of functional status in institutionalized elderly at risk of malnutrition. Clinical Nutrition 2008; 27:700–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M; Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003; 22(4):415–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. BRASIL: Lei no. 8.842, de 4 de janeiro de 1994. Dispõe sobre a política nacional do idoso, cria o Conselho Nacional do Idoso e dá outras providências. [http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8842.htm].

  13. Lipschitz DA. Screening for nutritional status in the elderly. Prim Care 1994; 22(1): 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frisancho AR. New norms of upper limb fat muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34:2540–2545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burr ML, Phillips MK. Anthropometric norms in the elderly. Br J Nutr 1984; 51:165–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: WHO; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Programa de Apoio a Nutrição (NUTWIN) — programa de computador, versão 1.5. São Paulo: UNIFESP/EPM; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Alimentos — NEPA. Tabela brasileira de composição de alimento — TACO (versão — 1). Campinas: NEPA-UNICAMP; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Tabela de Composição de Alimentos. 5.ed. Rio de Janeiro; 1999.

  20. Philippi ST. Tabela de Composição de Alimentos: Suporte para decisão nutricional. 2a ed. São Paulo: Coronário; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Food and Nutrition Board. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids (macronutrients). Washington: National Academy Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harris J, Benedict F. A biometric study of basal metabolism in man. Washington D.C. Carnegie Institute of Washington. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fleiss, J.L. (1981). /Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions/.2a ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Nova Iorque.

  24. Fletcher, R.; Fletcher, S.(2005). Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. 4a ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. SAS System for Windows (Statistical Analysis System), versão 9.2. SAS Institute Inc, 2002–2008, Cary, NC, USA.

  26. SPSS for Windows, versão 10.0. SPSS Inc, 1989–1999, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

  27. Amaral TF, Matos LC, Teixeira MA, Tavares MM, Álvares L, Antunes A. Undernutrition and associated factors among hospitalized patients. Clinical Nutrition 2010, doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2010.02.004. in press.

  28. Filipovic BF, Gajic M, Milinic N, Milovanovic B, Filipovic BR, Cvetkovic M, Sibalic N. Comparison of two nutritional assessment methods in gastroenterology patients. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2010; 16(16):1999–2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rasmussen HH, Kondrup J, Staun M, et al. Prevalence of patients at nutritional risk in Danish hospitals. Clinical Nutrition 2004; 23(5):1009–1015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Korfali G, Gundogdu H, Aydmtug S, Bahar M, Besler T, Moral AR, Oguz M, Sakarya M, Uyar M, Kihçturgay S. Nutritional risk of hospitalized patients in Turkey. Clinical Nutrition 2009; 28(5):533–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sorense J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, Schiesser M, Krahenbbuhl L, Meier R, et al. EuroOOPS: an international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clinical Nutrition 2008; 27:340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liang X, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, Efron DT, Kondrup J. Comparative survey on nutritional risk and nutritional support between Beijing and Baltimore teaching hospitals. Nutrition 2008; 24:9696–9676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vanderwee K, Clays E, Bocquaert I, Gobert M, Folens B, Defloor T. Malnutrition and associated factors in elderly hospital patients: A Belgian cross-sectional, multicentre study. Clinical Nutrition 2010; 29(4): 469–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beghetto MG, Luft VC, Mello ED, Polanczyk CA. Accuracy of nutritional assessment tools for predicting adverse hospital outcomes. Nutricion Hospitalaria 2009; 24(1):56–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Soini H, Routasalo P, Lagstrom H. Characteristics of the mini-nutritional assessment in elderly home-care patients. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 58:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Seman K, Abdul Manaf H, Ismail AR. Association between functional dentition with inadequate calorie intake and underweight in elderly people living in “Pondok” in Kelantan. Archives of Orofacial Sciences 2007; 2:10–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vânia Aparecida Leandro-Merhi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leandro-Merhi, V.A., De Aquino, J.L.B. & De Camargo, J.G.T. Agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the MNA in hospitalized elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 16, 128–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-011-0098-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-011-0098-1

Keywords

Navigation