Skip to main content
Log in

What are the outcomes of treatment among patients with sarcopenia?

  • Published:
JNHA - The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging

Abstract

Treatment outcomes for clinical trials of interventions on sarcopenia depend on the goals of the intervention, especially whether the treatment is considered therapeutic or preventive. Key issues regarding outcomes are the selection of a primary outcome and options for secondary outcomes. While clinical significance and face validity are key concerns when making this determination, other factors to be incorporated into the decision include measurement characteristics, feasibility and cost, risks of missing outcomes and options for alternative strategies to determine them. Primary should be highly responsive to changes in sarcopenia and clinically important. Like many problems of aging, functional abilities, especially mobility, may be the most clinically relevant states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Functional outcomes for clinical trials in frail older persons: time to be moving. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63:160–164.

  2. Indications, Labeling and OUtcomes Assessment for Drugs Aimed at Improving Functional Status in Older Persons J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci in press.

  3. Studenski S. Ferrucci L. eNM. Geriatrics. In: Williams G. RD, ed. Clinical and Translational Research McGraw-Hill; in press.

  4. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S, Fried LP, Cutler GB, Jr., Walston JD. Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:625–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guralnik JM, Branch LG, Cummings SR, Curb JD. Physical performance measures in aging research. J Gerontol 1989;44:M141–M146.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995;332:556–561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85–M94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardy SE, Perera S, Roumani YF, Chandler JM, Studenski SA. Improvement in usual gait speed predicts better survival in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:1727–1734.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:743–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perera S, Studenski S, Chandler JM, Guralnik JM. Magnitude and patterns of decline in health and function in 1 year affect subsequent 5-year survival. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005;60:894–900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, et al. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:314–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Espeland MA, Gill TM, Guralnik J, et al. Designing clinical trials of interventions for mobility disability: results from the lifestyle interventions and independence for elders pilot (LIFE-P) trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62:1237–1243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, et al. The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest 2003;123:387–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandler JM, Duncan PW, Kochersberger G, Studenski S. Is lower extremity strength gain associated with improvement in physical performance and disability in frail, community-dwelling elders? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:24–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy SE, Studenski, S. Missing data in Aging Research J Am Geriatr Soc in press.

  16. Pahor M, Blair SN, Espeland M, et al. Effects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: Results of the lifestyle interventions and independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61:1157–1165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardy SE, Gill TM. Recovery from disability among community-dwelling older persons. JAMA 2004;291:1596–1602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berlin JE, Storti KL, Brach JS. Using activity monitors to measure physical activity in free-living conditions. Phys Ther 2006;86:1137–1145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corder K, Brage S, Ekelund U. Accelerometers and pedometers: methodology and clinical application. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2007;10:597–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Esliger DW, Tremblay MS. Physical activity and inactivity profiling: the next generation. Can J Public Health 2007;98Suppl 2:S195–S207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1610–1614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peel C, Sawyer Baker P, Roth DL, Brown CJ, Brodner EV, Allman RM. Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB Study of Aging Life-Space Assessment. Phys Ther 2005;85:1008–1119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ettinger WH, Jr., Burns R, Messier SP, et al. A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). Jama 1997;277:25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brach JR, C. Studenski, S. Mobility In: al HJe, ed. Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology 6th edition: McGraw-Hill in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Studenski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Studenski, S. What are the outcomes of treatment among patients with sarcopenia?. J Nutr Health Aging 13, 733–736 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0206-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-009-0206-7

Keywords

Navigation