Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Probiotic Characterization of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei KNI9 Inhibiting Adherence of Yersinia enterocolitica on Caco-2 Cells In Vitro

  • Published:
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was aimed to characterize the probiotic properties of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei strain KNI9 and its antagonistic activity against Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica. The strain KNI9 was susceptible to antibiotics such as chloramphenicol, tetracycline, erythromycin, and streptomycin recommended by European food safety authority (EFSA). Strain KNI9 exhibited tolerance to simulated oro-gastrointestinal (OGT) condition, adherence to Caco-2 cells, and antimicrobial activity against intestinal enteric pathogens such as Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica, Shigella boydii, and Listeria monocytogenes. Furthermore, the strain KNI9 inhibited the adherence and invasiveness of Y. enterocolitica subsp. enterocolitica to Caco-2 cell line. These results indicate that the L. paracasei subsp. paracasei KNI9 could be further developed into a potential probiotic strain after appropriate in vivo studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadernowska A, Chajęcka-Wierzchowska W, Łaniewska-Trokenheim Ł (2013) Yersinia enterocolitica: a dangerous, but often ignored, foodborne pathogen. Food Rev Int 30(1):53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2013.853775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabina Y, Rahman A, Ray RC, Montet D (2011) Yersinia enterocolitica: mode of transmission, molecular insights of virulence, and pathogenesis of infection. J Pathog 2011:429069. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/429069

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shayegani M, Morse D, DeForge I, Root T, Parsons LM, Maupin PS (1983) Microbiology of a major foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by Yersinia enterocolitica serogroup O:8. J Clin Microbiol 17(1):35–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Drummond N, Murphy BP, Ringwood T, Prentice MB, Buckley JF, Fanning S (2012) Yersinia enterocolitica: a brief review of the issues relating to the zoonotic pathogen, public health challenges, and the pork production chain. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9(3):179–189. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.0938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nowak B, Mueffling TV, Caspari K, Hartung J (2006) Validation of a method for the detection of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica and their distribution in slaughter pigs from conventional and alternative housing systems. Vet Microbiol 117(2–4):219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottone EJ (1997) Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin Microbiol Rev 10(2):257–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamali H, Paydar M, Radmehr B, Ismail S (2015) Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial resistance of Yersinia species and Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from raw milk in farm bulk tanks. J Dairy Sci 98(2):798–803. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ye Q, Wu Q, Hu H, Zhang J, Huang H (2015) Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from retail frozen foods in China. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362(24):fnv197. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnv197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fabrega A, Vila J (2012) Yersinia enterocolitica: pathogenesis, virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 30(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2011.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, Calder PC, Sanders ME (2014) Expert consensus document. The international scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(8):506–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimm V, Riedel CU (2016) Manipulation of the microbiota using probiotics. Adv Exp Med Biol 902:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Britton RA, Versalovic J (2008) Probiotics and gastrointestinal infections. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2008:290769. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/290769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Damodharan K, Palaniyandi SA, Yang SH, Suh JW (2015) In vitro probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus strains from fermented radish and their anti-adherence activity against enteric pathogens. Can J Microbiol 61(11):837–850. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2015-0311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Damodharan K, Lee YS, Palaniyandi SA, Yang SH, Suh JW (2015) Preliminary probiotic and technological characterization of Pediococcus pentosaceus strain KID7 and in vivo assessment of its cholesterol-lowering activity. Front Microbiol 6:768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00768

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Palaniyandi SA, Damodharan K, Suh JW, Yang SH (2017) In Vitro characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum strains with inhibitory activity on enteropathogens for use as potential animal probiotics. Indian J Microbiol 57(2):201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-017-0646-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW (2008) Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3(2):163–175. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. EFSA (2012) Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance EFSA panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP). EFSA J 10(6):2740. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuo Y, Yu H, Ai L, Wu Z, Guo B, Chen W (2013) Aggregation and adhesion properties of 22 Lactobacillus strains. J Dairy Sci 96(7):4252–4257. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Altenhoefer A, Oswald S, Sonnenborn U, Enders C, Schulze J, Hacker J, Oelschlaeger TA (2004) The probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 interferes with invasion of human intestinal epithelial cells by different enteroinvasive bacterial pathogens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 40(3):223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-8244(03)00368-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Riaz Rajoka MS, Zhao H, Lu Y, Lian Z, Li N, Hussain N, Shao D, Jin M, Li Q, Shi J (2018) Anticancer potential against cervix cancer (HeLa) cell line of probiotic Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei strains isolated from human breast milk. Food Funct 9(5):2705–2715. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8fo00547h

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noda M, Sugimoto S, Hayashi I, Danshiitsoodol N, Fukamachi M, Sugiyama M (2018) A novel structure of exopolysaccharide produced by a plant-derived lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus paracasei IJH-SONE68. J Biochem 164:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvy048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Munoz-Quezada S, Chenoll E, Vieites JM, Genoves S, Maldonado J, Bermudez-Brito M, Gomez-Llorente C, Matencio E, Bernal MJ, Romero F, Suarez A, Ramon D, Gil A (2013) Isolation, identification and characterisation of three novel probiotic strains (Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-4034, Bifidobacterium breve CNCM I-4035 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-4036) from the faeces of exclusively breast-fed infants. Br J Nutr 109(Suppl 2):S51–S62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512005211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai YT, Cheng PC, Pan TM (2010) Immunomodulating activity of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157H7-infected mice. J Agric Food Chem 58(21):11265–11272. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103011z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Caridi A (2002) Selection of Escherichia coli-inhibiting strains of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29(6):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.7000300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ocana VS, de Ruiz Holgado AA, Nader-Macias ME (1999) Growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus by H2O2-producing Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei isolated from the human vagina. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 23(2):87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bengoa AA, Zavala L, Carasi P, Trejo SA, Bronsoms S, Serradell MLA, Garrote GL, Abraham AG (2018) Simulated gastrointestinal conditions increase adhesion ability of Lactobacillus paracasei strains isolated from kefir to Caco-2 cells and mucin. Food Res Int 103:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelletier C, Bouley C, Cayuela C, Bouttier S, Bourlioux P, Bellon-Fontaine MN (1997) Cell surface characteristics of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(5):1725–1731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Smokvina T, Wels M, Polka J, Chervaux C, Brisse S, Boekhorst J, van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Siezen RJ (2013) Lactobacillus paracasei comparative genomics: towards species pan-genome definition and exploitation of diversity. PLoS One 8(7):e68731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Belkacem N, Bourdet-Sicard R, Taha MK (2018) Lactobacillus paracasei feeding improves the control of secondary experimental meningococcal infection in flu-infected mice. BMC Infect Dis 18(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3086-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zivkovic M, Miljkovic MS, Ruas-Madiedo P, Markelic MB, Veljovic K, Tolinacki M, Sokovic S, Korac A, Golic N (2016) EPS-SJ exopolisaccharide produced by the strain Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei BGSJ2-8 is involved in adhesion to epithelial intestinal cells and decrease on E. coli association to Caco-2 cells. Front Microbiol 7:286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jankowska A, Laubitz D, Antushevich H, Zabielski R, Grzesiuk E (2008) Competition of Lactobacillus paracasei with Salmonella enterica for adhesion to Caco-2 cells. J Biomed Biotechnol 2008:357964. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/357964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. FAO/WHO (2001) Expert Consultation on health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Accessed February 11 1–4 October, 2008

  33. Vesterlund S (2009) Mechanisms of probiotics: Production of antimicrobial substances. In: Lee YK, Salminen S (eds) Handbook of Probiotics and Prebiotics, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gonzalez de Llano D, Esteban-Fernandez A, Requena T, Bartolome B, Moreno-Arribas MV (2014) Assessment of probiotic properties in lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine. Food Microbiol 44:220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.06.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miljkovic M, Strahinic I, Tolinacki M, Zivkovic M, Kojic S, Golic N, Kojic M (2015) AggLb is the largest cell-aggregation factor from Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei BGNJ1-64, functions in collagen adhesion, and pathogen exclusion In Vitro. PLoS One 10(5):e0126387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Miljkovic M, Bertani I, Fira D, Jovcic B, Novovic K, Venturi V, Kojic M (2016) Shortening of the Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei BGNJ1-64 AggLb protein switches its activity from auto-aggregation to biofilm formation. Front Microbiol 7:1422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01422

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee YK, Puong KY, Ouwehand AC, Salminen S (2003) Displacement of bacterial pathogens from mucus and Caco-2 cell surface by lactobacilli. J Med Microbiol 52(Pt 10):925–930. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.05009-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Muyyarikkandy MS, Alqahtani FH, Mandoiu I, Amalaradjou MA (2018) Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus paracasei DUP 13076, which exhibits potent antipathogenic effects against Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis, typhimurium, and Heidelberg. Genome Announc 6(7):e00065-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00065-18

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A3B03027816).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Nutraceutical and Pharmaceutical Materials, College of Natural Science, Myongji University, Cheoin-gu, Yongin, Gyeonggi-Do, 17058, Republic of Korea

    Karthiyaini Damodharan & Joo-Won Suh

  2. Department of Biotechnology, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Mepco Nagar, Mepco Engineering College Post, Sivakasi, Tamilnadu, 626005, India

    Sasikumar Arunachalam Palaniyandi

  3. Department of Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, Yeosu, Chonnam, 59626, Republic of Korea

    Seung Hwan Yang

Authors
  1. Karthiyaini Damodharan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sasikumar Arunachalam Palaniyandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joo-Won Suh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seung Hwan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joo-Won Suh or Seung Hwan Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 21.1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damodharan, K., Palaniyandi, S.A., Suh, JW. et al. Probiotic Characterization of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei KNI9 Inhibiting Adherence of Yersinia enterocolitica on Caco-2 Cells In Vitro. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 12, 600–607 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09535-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09535-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation