Skip to main content
Log in

Development of atmospheric correction algorithm for Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI)

  • Article
  • Published:
Ocean Science Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an atmospheric correction algorithm for Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) and its early phase evaluation. This algorithm was implemented in GOCI Data Processing System (GDPS) version 1.1. The algorithm is based on the standard SeaWiFS method, which accounts for multiple scattering effects and partially updated in terms of turbid case-2 water correction, optimized aerosol models, and solar angle correction per slot. For turbid water correction, we used a regional empirical relationship between water reflectance at the red (660 nm) and near infrared bands (745 nm and 865 nm). The relationship was derived from turbid pixels in satellite images after atmospheric correction, and processed using aerosol properties derived for neighboring non-turbid waters. For validation of the GOCI atmospheric correction, we compared our results with in situ measurements of normalized water leaving radiance (nL w ) spectra that were obtained during several cruises in 2011 around Korean peninsula. The match up showed an acceptable result with mean ratio of the GOCI to in situ nL w (λ), 1.17, 1.24, 1.26, 1.15, 0.86 and 0.99 at 412 nm, 443 nm, 490 nm, 555 nm, 660 nm and 680 nm, respectively. It is speculated that part of the deviation arose from a lack of vicarious calibration and uncertainties in the above water nLw measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blanchard DC (1971) Whitecaps at sea. J Atmos Sci 28:645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers DG, Boudjelas S, Harker GEL (1998) The distribution of fine suspended sediments in the surface waters of the Irish Sea and its relation to tidal stirring. Int J Remote Sens 19(14):2789–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DK, Gordon HR, Voss KJ, Ge Y, Broenkow W, Trees C (1997) Validation of atmospheric correction over the oceans. J Geo Res 102(D14):17209–17217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox C, Munk W (1954a) Measurements of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the sun’s glitter. J Opt Soc Am 44(11):838–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox C, Munk W (1954b) Statistics of the sea surface derived from sun glitter. J Mar Res 13(2):198–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxaran D, Froidefond J-M, Lavender S, Castaing P (2002) Spectral signatures of highly turbid waters: Application with SPOT data to quantify suspended particulate matter concentrations. Remote Sens Environ 81:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eplee RE, Robinson WD, Bailey SW, Clark DK, Werdell PJ, Wang M, Barnes RA, McClain CR (2011) Calibration of SeaWiFS. II: Vicarious techniques. Appl Optics 40(36):6701–6718

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima H, Toratani M, Murakami H, Deschamps PY, Frouin R, Tanaka A (2007) Evaluation of ADEOS-II GLI Ocean Color Atmospheric Correction Using SIMBADA Handheld Radiometer Data. J Oceanogr 63(3):533–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR (1978) Removal of atmospheric effects from satellite imagery of the oceans. Appl Optics 17:1631–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR, Clark DK, Brown JW, Evans RH, Broenkow WW (1983) Phytoplankton pigment concentrations in the Middle Atlantic Bight: Comparison of ship determinations and CZCS estimates. Appl Optics 22(1):20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR, Brown JW, Evans RH (1988) Exact Rayleigh scattering calculations for use with the Nimbus-7 Coastal Zone Color Scanner. Appl Optics 27(5):862–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR, Wang M (1992) Surface-roughness considerations for atmospheric correction of ocean color sensors. I: The Rayleigh-scattering component. Appl Optics 31(21):4247–4260

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR, Wang M (1994a) Retrieval of water-leaving radiance and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: A preliminary algorithm. Appl Optics 33(3):443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR, Wang M (1994b) Influence of oceanic whitecaps on atmospheric correction of ocean-color sensors. Appl Optics 33(33):7754–7763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HR (1998) In-Orbit Calibration Strategy for Ocean Color Sensors. Remote Sens Environ 63:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu C, Carder KL, Muller-Karger FE (2000) Atmospheric correction of SeaWiFS imagery over turbid coastal waters: A practical method. Remote Sens Environ 74:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IOCCG (2010) Atmospheric correction for remotely-sensed ocean colour products. In: Antoine D (ed) Reports of the International Ocean-Colour Coordinating Group, No. 10, IOCCG, Dartmouth, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Li Z, Wong MS, Xin J, Wang Y, Zhao F (2007) Aerosol single scattering albedo estimated across China from a combination of ground and satellite measurements. J Geophys Res 112:D22S15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Kim YJ (2010) Satellite remote sensing of Asian aerosols: a case study of clean, polluted, and Asian dust storm days. Atmos Meas Tech 3:1771–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee ZP, Ahn YH, Mobley CD, Arnone R (2010) Removal of surface-reflected light for the measurement of remote-sensing reflectance from an above-surface platform. Opt Express 18(25): 26313–26324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley CD (1999) Estimation of the remote-sensing reflectance from above-surface easurements. Appl Optics 38(36):7442–7455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Prieur L (1977) Analysis of variations in ocean color. Limnol Oceanogr 22(4):709–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon JE, Park YJ, Ryu JH, Choi JK, Ahn JH, Min JE, Son YB, Lee SJ, Han HJ, Ahn YH (2012) Initial validation of GOCI water products against in situ data collected around Korean peninsular for 2010–2011. Ocean Sci J (this issue)

  • Neukermans G, Ruddick K, Bernard E, Ramon D, Nechad B, Deschamps PY (2008) Mapping total suspended matter from geostationary satellites: a feasibility study with SEVIRI in the Southern North Sea. Opt Express 17(6):14029–14052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick KG, Ovidio F, Rijkeboer M (2000) Atmospheric correction of SeaWiFS imagery for turbid coastal and inland waters. Appl Optics 39(6):897–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick KG, Cauwer VD, Park YJ (2005) Use of the near infrared similarity reflectance spectrum for the quality control of remote sensing data. In: Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium, pp 1–12

  • Ruddick KG, Cauwer VD, Park YJ (2006) Seaborne measurements of near infrared water-leaving reflectance: The similarity spectrum for turbid waters. Limnol Oceanogr 51(2):1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick KG, Nechad B, Neukermans G, Park Y, Doxaran D, Sirjacobs D, Beckers J-M (2008) Remote sensing of suspended particulate matter in turbid waters: State of the art and future perspectives. In: Proceedings of the Ocean Optics XIX conference, Barga

  • Shettle EP, Fenn RW (1979) Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of humidity variations on their optical properties. Env Res Papers 676:AFGL-TR-79-0214

  • Shi W, Wang M (2009) An assessment of the black ocean pixel assumption for MODIS SWIR bands. Remote Sens Environ 113(8):1587–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel DA, Wang M, Maritorena S, Robinson W (2000) Atmospheric correction of satellite ocean color imagery: The black pixel assumption. Appl Optics 39(21):3582–3591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf RP, Arnone RA, Gould RW, Martinolich PM, Ransibrahmanakul V (2003) A partially coupled ocean-atmosphere model for retrieval of water-leaving radiance from SeaWiFS in coastal waters. SwaWiFS Postlaunch Tech Rep Ser 22:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Toratani M, Fukushima H, Murakami H, Tanaka A (2007) Atmospheric Correction Scheme for GLI with Absorptive Aerosol Correction. J Oceanogr 63(3):525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Gordon HR (1994) A simple, moderately accurate, atmospheric correction algorithm for SeaWiFS. Remote Sens Environ 50(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2002a) The Rayleigh lookup tables for the SeaWiFS data processing: Accounting for the effects of ocean surface roughness. Int J Remote Sens 23(13):2693–2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2002b) Correction of artifacts in the SeaWiFS atmospheric correction: removing discontinuity in the derived products. Remote Sens Environ 84:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2005) A refinement for the Rayleigh radiance computation with variation of the atmospheric pressure. Int J Remote Sens 26(24):5651–5663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Shi W (2007) The NIR-SWIR combined atmospheric correction approach for MODIS ocean color data processing. Opt Express 15(24):15722–15733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Shi W, Jiang L (2012) Atmospheric correction using near-infrared bands for satellite ocean color data processing in the turbid western Pacific region. Opt Express 20(2):741–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Je Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahn, JH., Park, YJ., Ryu, JH. et al. Development of atmospheric correction algorithm for Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI). Ocean Sci. J. 47, 247–259 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-012-0026-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-012-0026-2

Key words

Navigation