Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How the choice of food security indicators affects the assessment of resilience—an example from northern Ethiopia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using longitudinal survey data from northern Ethiopia collected over 18 months, this study shows that conclusions about household food security are highly sensitive to measurement decisions. Especially important are 1) decisions about which food security indicators and cut-offs are chosen, and 2) whether analysis focuses on food security status at a given point in time or food security resilience over time. We define resilience as the probability that a household is truly above a chosen food security cut-off, given its underlying assets, demographic characteristics, and past food security status. Our study finds that different factors determine food security status and food security resilience. We also find that the drivers of resilience vary depending on whether food security is measured by Food Consumption Score (FCS) or the reduced Coping Strategies Index (rCSI). Literacy and livestock holdings are associated with both FCS status and FCS resilience, and the latter is also predicted by access to safe water and sanitation, the dependency ratio, and debt. In contrast, only previous rCSI scores predict current rCSI status, while marital status, literacy, livestock, and other forces matter for determining rCSI resilience. We also find that conclusions about food security resilience are sensitive to the cut-offs chosen to signify a food secure state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Religion was included for its potential effect on food preferences, especially fasting practices. The second and third survey rounds overlapped partially with Lent, during which Orthodox Christians do not consume meat, milk, or eggs. We investigated the possible impact of fasting on food security outcomes during these rounds, but found that the round-by-round trends for meat, milk, and egg consumption by Christians approximated the trajectories of other food groups.

  2. Tropical Livestock Units are calculated using the following weights: cow or oxen = 0.7; donkey = 0.5; goat or sheep = 0.1; poultry = 0.01.

  3. We use kebele dummies, instead of livelihood zone dummies, to control for observed differences in geographical characteristics (especially altitude and market access) across kebeles in the same woreda.

  4. The two-parameter gamma distribution is more flexible than a normal distribution and is non-negative, which is convenient for well-being distributions. For further discussion of the selection of distributions, see Cissé and Barrett (2018).

References

  • Adato, M., Carter, M. R., & May, J. (2006). Exploring poverty traps and social exclusion in South Africa using qualitative and quantitative data. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500405345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B. (Ed.). (2011). Why poverty persists: Poverty dynamics in Asia and Africa. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., & Carter, M. R. (2013). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: Empirical and policy implications. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(7), 976–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.785527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Marenya, P. P., McPeak, J., Minten, B., Murithi, F., Oluoch-Kosura, W., Place, F., Randrianarisoa, J. C., Rasambainarivo, J., & Wangila, J. (2006). Welfare dynamics in rural Kenya and Madagascar. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 248–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500405394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. R., & May, J. (2001). One kind of freedom: Poverty dynamics in post-apartheid South Africa. World Development, 29(12), 1987–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00089-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. R., & Barrett, C. B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaenson, L. & Boisvert, R. (2000). On measuring household food vulnerability: case evidence from Northern Mali. Working paper. Department of Agricultural, Resource, and Managerial Economics, Cornell University.

  • Cissé, J. D., & Barrett, C. B. (2018). Estimating development resilience: A conditional moments-based approach. Journal of Development Economics, 135, 272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cissé, J.D. and Ikegami, M. (2016). Does insurance improve resilience? (In preparation). Available at http://publications.dyson.cornell.edu/grad/candidates/2016/Dyson-JenCisse-Paper.pdf

  • Department for International Development (DFID), UK. (2011). Defining disaster resilience: A DFID approach paper. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Agency (DPPA), Government of Ethiopia. (2008). Saesie Tsaeda Amba Woreda. Report from the livelihoods information unit of the Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Agency (DPPA). Addis Ababa.

  • Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–766. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger, T., Langworthy, M., & Spangler, T. (2012). Enhancing resilience to food security shocks. White paper (draft). Tucson: TANGO International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebrehiwot, T., & van der Ween, A. (2014). Coping with food insecurity on a micro-scale: Evidence from Ethiopian rural households. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 53, 214–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goshu, D. (2013). The dynamics of poverty and vulnerability in rural Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 22(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knippenberg, E., Jensen, N., & Constas, M. (2019). Quantifying household resilience with high frequency data: Temporal dynamics and methodological options. World Development, 121, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, S., & Smith, S. C. (2013). Regional agricultural endowments and shifts of poverty trap equilibria: Evidence from Ethiopian panel data. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(7), 955–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.785523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lybbert, T. J., Barrett, C. B., Desta, S., & Coppock, D. L. (2004). Stochastic wealth dynamics and risk management among a poor population. Economic Journal, 114, 750–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D., Vaitla, B. Tesfay, G., and Abadi, N. (2013). Resilience, food security dynamics, and poverty traps in northern Ethiopia. Feinstein International Center, October 2013.

  • Maxwell, D., Vaitla, B., & Coates, J. (2014). How do indicators of household food insecurity measure up? An empirical comparison from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 47(C), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D. and Caldwell, R. (2008). The Coping Strategies Index: Field Methods Manual, Second Edition.

  • Michelson, H., Muiz, M., & DeRosa, K. (2013). Measuring socio-economic status in the millennium villages: The role of asset index choice. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(7), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.785525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naschold, F. (2013). Welfare dynamics in Pakistan and Ethiopia – Does the estimation method matter? The Journal of Development Studies, 49(7), 936–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.785522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phadera, L., Michelson, H., Winter-Nelson, A. E., & Goldsmith, P. (2019). Do asset transfers build household resilience? Journal of Development Economics, 138, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing, A. R., & Baulch, B. (2013). Assets and poverty traps in rural Bangladesh. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(7), 898–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.785524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton, J. B., Cissé, J. D., & Barrett, C. B. (2016). Food security as resilience: Reconciling definition and measurement. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaitla, B., Coates, J., and Maxwell, D. (2015). Comparing household food consumption indicators to inform acute food insecurity phase classification. Washington, DC: FHI 360/Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA).

  • Vaitla, B., Coates, J., Glaeser, L., Hillbruner, C., Biswal, P., & Maxwell, D. (2017). The measurement of household food security: Correlation and latent variable analysis of alternative indicators in a large multi-country dataset. Food Policy, 68, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, X. (2015). Measuring climate resilience and vulnerability: A case study from Ethiopia. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, B., Nussbaumer, E., Upton, J., Campion, A., Riely, F. and Foster, E. (2017). Phase II Famine Early Warning Systems network resilience measurement activity: methodology report. USAID/Kimetrica.

  • Wiesmann, D., Bassett, L., Benson, T., and Hoddinott, J. (2009). Validation of the World Food Program’s Food Consumption Score and alternative indicators of household food security. Discussion Paper 008970, International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • World Food Program. (2008). Food consumption analysis: calculation and use of the food consumption score in food security analysis. Technical Guidance Sheet. WFP Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping, February 2008.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA) and additional funding from the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This support spanned the period from 2010 to 2013 and supported the field data collection. The field teams that collected data in four rounds over a two-year period included Ataklti Techane, Bereket Gebre Medhin, Fisseha Gebre Tensae, Selam Yirga, Martha Tekle, Michael Gebre Hiwot, Kidane Hintsa, Lemlem Fitsum, Samson Hadgu, Gebresselassie Hailu, Haile Tewelde, Dawit Gebre Her, and Ataklti Haile; our thanks to all for their hard work. Special thanks to Julia Van Horn for editorial assistance. We are solely responsible for any errors in the analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bapu Vaitla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 94 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaitla, B., Cissé, J.D., Upton, J. et al. How the choice of food security indicators affects the assessment of resilience—an example from northern Ethiopia. Food Sec. 12, 137–150 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00989-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00989-w

Keywords

Navigation