Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Livelihood effects of crop diversification: a panel data analysis of rural farm households in Zambia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined factors driving farm households to diversify their crop production, using panel data from two waves of nationally representative surveys of rural farm households in Zambia. The Simpson Index of Diversification was used as the dependent variable in a determinants model, first testing for fixed effects and then estimating a QMLE model to test for robustness of the results. Factors that promoted agricultural diversification included agricultural extension, asset endowment, smallholder access to land, access to markets, and investments in irrigation and water harvesting. However, the two key government policy programs of the Food Reserve Agency (FRA) and Farmer Input Support Program (FISP) (which focuses on maize) negatively affected crop diversification. We also examined the impact of crop diversification on livelihoods measured by household income, Months of Household Adequate Food Provisions (MAHFP), Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) and Food Consumption Score (FCS). Crop diversification had a positive and significant impact on farm income (but not household income) and MAHFP. The impact on HDDS and FCS, though positive and significant, was much weaker. We conclude that diversifying crop production in Zambia is necessary for raising rural farm income and food availability but less so for improving access to a diverse range of foods as measured by the HDDS and FCS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. SEAs are the lowest geographical sampling units used by CSO and were the primary sampling units. An SEA typically contains 100–200 households.

  2. One United States dollar is approximately equivalent to ZMW10.

References

  • Arslan, A., Cavatassi, R., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Alfani, F., and Kokwe, M. 2016. Diversification under Climate Variability as Part of A CSA Strategy In Rural Zambia. ESA Working Paper No. 16-07. Rome, FAO. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311321300_Diversification_under_climate_variability_as_part_of_a_CSA_strategy_in_rural_Zambia. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  • Becker, G. (1976). Economic analysis and human behaviour. In L. Levy-Gaboua (Ed.), Sociological Economics. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W.J., Jayne, T.S., & Chapoto, A. (2010). Factors Contributing to Zambia’s 2010 Maize Bumper Harvest. Food Security Research Project Working Paper No. 48. Lusaka, Zambia: FSRP. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/wp48.pdf.

  • Carter, M.R. (2000). Land Ownership Inequality and Income Distribution Consequences of Economic Growth. The United Nations University World Institute for Development Research Working Papers No. 201. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University World Institute for Development.

  • CSO/MAL/IAPRI. (2012). Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives and Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute 2012 Rural Agricultural Livelihood Survey (RALS). Lusaka, Zambia: CSO, MAL, IAPRI.

  • CSO/MAL/IAPRI. (2015). Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives and Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute 2015 Rural Agricultural Livelihood Survey (RALS). Lusaka, Zambia: CSO, MAL, IAPRI.

  • Farnworth, C.R. (2010). Gender-Aware Approaches in Agricultural Programmes: A Study of SIDAsupported Agricultural Programmes’, Sida Evaluation 2010:3. Stockholm: Sida.

  • Farnworth, C.R., Akamandisa, V.M., & Hichaambwa, M. (2011). Zambia feed the future gender assessment. Lusaka, Zambia: United States Agency for International Development.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2013). Guideline for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. Rome: Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • von Grebmer, K., Bernstein, J., Hossain, N., Brown, T. et al. (2017). Global hunger index: The inequalities of hunger. Washington, D.C.; Bonn; and Dublin: International food policy research institute, Welthungerhilfe, and Concern Worldwide. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896292710

  • GRZ (Government of the Republic of Zambia). (2016). Second National Agriculture Policy (SNAP). Ministry of Agriculture and Ministry Livestock and Fisheries, Lusaka.

  • GRZ (Government of the Republic of Zambia). (2017). Seventh National Development Plan 2017–2021. Ministry of National Development and Planning, Lusaka.

  • Hichaambwa, M. & Jayne, T.S. (2014). Poverty Reduction Potential of Increasing Smallholder Access to Land. IAPRI Working Paper No. 83. Lusaka, Zambia: IAPRI.

  • Hichaambwa, M., Chamberlin, J., & Kabwe, S. (2015). Is smallholder horticulture the unfunded poverty reduction option in Zambia? A comparative assessment of welfare effects of participation in horticultural and Maize Markets. IAPRI Working Paper No. 96. Lusaka, Zambia: IAPRI.

  • Islam, A. H. M. S., von Braun, J., Thorne-Lyman, A. L., & Ahmed, A. U. (2018). Farm diversification and food and nutrition security in Bangladesh: Empirical evidence from nationally representative household panel data. Food Security, 10(3), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0806-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayne, T. S., & Argwings-Kodhek, G. (1997). Consumer response to maize market liberalization in urban Kenya. Food Policy, 22(5), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, P. K., Gulati, A., Birthal, P. S., & Tewari, L. (2004). Agriculture diversification in South Asia: Patterns, determinants and policy implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(24), 2457–−2467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankwamba, H., Kadzamira, M., & Pauw, K. (2018). How diversified is cropping in Malawi? Patterns, determinants and policy implications. Food Security, 10(2), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0771-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, L. (2001). The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction. SIDA. Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis. Stockholm.

  • Kuteya, A., Sitko, N., Chapoto, A., & Malawo, E., (2016). An In-depth Analysis of Zambia’s Agricultural Budget: Distribution Effects and Opportunity Costs. IAPRI Working Paper No. 107. Lusaka, Zambia: IAPRI.

  • Lin, B. B. (2011). Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience, 61(3), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maidment, R.I., Grimes, D., Allan, R.P., et al. (2014). The 30-year TAMSAT African Rainfall Climatology and Time-series (TARCAT) Dataset. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119.18, 10,619−10,644.

  • MAL (Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock). (2013). Zambia National Agriculture Investment Plan (NAIP) 2014-2018. Under the comprehensive Africa agriculture development programme (CAADP). Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock.

  • Mattila-Wiro, P. (1999). Economics Theories of the Household: A Critical Review. WIDER working papers (1986–2000) 1999/159. UNU-WIDER: Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mofya-Mukuka, R., & Hichaambwa, M. (2015). Agricultural diversification: What is holding Zambia Back? In Agriculture in Zambia: The Past, Present and Future, ed. Antony Chapoto and Nicholas Sitko. Lusaka: IAPRI.

  • Papke, L. E., & Woodridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with application to 401(K) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145(1, 2), 121–−133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R.D. & Prescott, R. (1980). Diversification in relation to farm size and other socioeconomic characteristics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 554–559.

  • Sibhatu, K. T., & Qaim, M. (2018). Farm production diversity and dietary quality: Linkages and measurement issues. Food Security, 10(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0762-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichoongo, K., Mapemba, L., Tembo, G., & Ng’ong’ola, D. (2014). The determinants and extent of crop diversification among smallholders. A case study of Southern Province of Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(11), 150−159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2011) Diversification in Agriculture, Retrieved from https://www.eoearth.org/view/article/151757. Accessed 5 May 2014.

  • Singh, I., Squire, L., & Strauss, J. (1986). A survey of agricultural household models: Recent findings and policy implications. The World Bank Economic Review, 1(1), 149–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swindale, A. & Bilinsky, P. (2006). Household. Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (v.2). Washington, D.C.: FHI 360/FANTA.

  • Turner, E.C. (2014). Determinants of crop diversification among Mozambiquan smallholders: Evidence from household panel data. M.S. Thesis. Michigan State University, USA.

  • WFP VAM. (2008). Food consumption analysis: Calculation and use of the food consumption score in food security analysis. World food programme, vulnerability analysis and mapping branch VAM unit HQ Rome..

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2018. Productive Diversification of African Agriculture and its Effects on Resilience and Nutrition. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank.

  • Zulu-Mbata, O., Chapoto, A and Hichaambwa, M. (2016). Determinants of Conservation Agriculture Adoption among Zambian Smallholder Farmers. Working P. 114.

Download references

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this article, by the same authors, was published as a Working Paper in the Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI) series of Working Papers. The paper can be accessed online at http://www.iapri.org.zm/images/WorkingPapers/wp112_for_pdf.pdf. We are grateful to Chris Thompson from the Department for International Development, UKAID Zambia for proof reading the manuscript and suggesting improvements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhoda Mofya-Mukuka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this article declare no conflict of interest in the content of the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mofya-Mukuka, R., Hichaambwa, M. Livelihood effects of crop diversification: a panel data analysis of rural farm households in Zambia. Food Sec. 10, 1449–1462 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0872-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0872-6

Keywords

Navigation