Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainability spaces for complex agri-food systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of the complexity of agri-food systems, popularly-supported ‘win-win’ solutions rarely result in wholly satisfactory outcomes. We draw on documented cases of the introduction of agricultural input subsidies; the intensification of livestock production; and the development of genetically modified crop varieties as examples of agri-food systems in which there are multiple interconnected sustainability priorities and inevitable conflicts. Generic or narrowly conceived goals may not fully reflect the multiple and conflicting dimensions of sustainability that are relevant to such cases. There is a need to advance established multiple-win agendas, such as sustainable intensification and climate smart agriculture, to more fully reflect this complexity. We propose the use of the sustainability space concept for defining and monitoring sustainability priorities that might become the basis for effective management of complex systems. We further outline the challenge of defining and monitoring these priorities, which will require carefully designed, interdisciplinary and participatory research agendas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton, J. R., Middleton, J., & Lang, T. (2014). Open letter to prime minister David Cameron on food poverty in the UK. The Lancet, 383, 1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, D. L., Corman, J., Edwards, M., & Elser, J. J. (2011). Sustainability challenges of phosphorus and food: solutions from closing the human phosphorus cycle. BioScience, 61, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinsinga, B. (2011). Seeds and subsidies: the political economy of input programmes in Malawi. IDS Bulletin, 42, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, G. (2000). Genetically modified crops: risks and promise. Conservation Ecology, 4, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., & Dedieu, B. (2012). Farming Systems Research: an Approach to Inquiry. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, G., Kabambe, P., Sanchez, P., Malik, A., Flor, R., Harawa, R., Nkhoma, P., Zamba, C., Banda, C., Magombo, C., Keating, M., Wangila, J., & Sachs, J. (2009). Input subsidies to improve smallholder maize productivity in Malawi: toward an African green revolution. PLoS Biology, 7, e23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward, A., & Chirwa, E. (2011). The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9, 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J. (2015). The debate over sustainable intensification. Food Security, 1–10.

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812–818.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. E., Vieths, S., Sampson, H. A., Hill, D., Ebisawa, M., Taylor, S. L., & Van Ree, R. (2008). Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops[mdash]what makes sense? Nature Biotechnology, 26, 73–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, F. (2013). UK needs ‘mega farms’ to keep food prices down, say experts. The Guardian.

  • Jayne, T. S., Govereh, J., Mwanaumo, A., Nyoro, J. K., & Chapoto, A. (2002). False promise or false premise? The experience of food and input market reform in Eastern and Southern Africa. World Development, 30, 1967–1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouysset, L., Doyen, L., & Jiguet, F. (2014). From population viability analysis to coviability of farmland biodiversity and agriculture. Conservation Biology, 28, 187–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeldt, H., Jahn, M., Campbell, B. M., Beddington, J. R., Declerck, F., de Pinto, A., Gulledge, J., Hellin, J., Herrero, M., & Jarvis, A. (2013). Beyond climate-smart agriculture: toward safe operating spaces for global food systems. Agriculture & Food Security, 2, 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, B., & Snapp, S. (2015). What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts. Land Use Policy, 46, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 363, 447–465.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the doughnut. Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience, 8, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417–2431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, H. (2013). Campaigners warn against rise of the ‘mega-farms’: could massive pig, fish and dairy units harm the environment? The Independent.

  • Whitfield, S. (2016). Adapting to Climate Uncertainty in African Agriculture: Narratives and Knowledge Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, S., & Reed, M. (2011). Participatory environmental assessment in drylands: introducing a new approach. Journal of Arid Environments, 77, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, S., Dixon, J. L., Mulenga, B. P., & Ngoma, H. (2015). Conceptualising farming systems for agricultural development research: cases from Eastern and Southern Africa. Agricultural Systems, 133, 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulu, P., Kalinda, T., & Tembo, G. (2014). Effects of the maize input subsidy program on groundnuts production in Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, p253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Whitfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Whitfield, S., Benton, T.G., Dallimer, M. et al. Sustainability spaces for complex agri-food systems. Food Sec. 7, 1291–1297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0512-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0512-3

Keywords

Navigation