Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mobile apps for self-management in pregnancy: a systematic review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complications during pregnancy is a major problem affecting healthcare systems which requires the efforts of both patients and healthcare practitioners. For this reason, mobile apps have been increasingly sought to support self-management during pregnancy. Although many benefits have been claimed for the inclusion of self-management mobile apps in supporting care, the domains already explored, functionalities and impacts of mobile apps for self-management in pregnancy is still not clear. A clear understanding of the health domains already explored functionalities of existing apps which have been evaluated as well as the effectiveness of these apps can help researchers and health practitioners identify areas of future needs for self-management mobile apps during pregnancy. The objective of this systematic review was to provide a narrative synthesis of the literature on the evaluation of mobile apps for self-management during pregnancy. The search was conducted on four databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and EMBASE. 18 articles met the inclusion criteria. Nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one non-randomised controlled trial (NRCT) and eight observation studies evaluating self-management mobile apps among pregnant women were identified. Mobile apps for self-management have been developed with different functionalities addressing various areas of complications during pregnancy including gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and high blood pressure. These apps have also been evaluated in countries mostly in the developed context. We conclude that there have been positive impacts of mobile apps for self-management during pregnancy; however, future research should focus on evaluating mobile apps for self-management during pregnancy within developing countries as well as the use of mobile apps for the identification of sexually transmitted infections, early warning signs of potential still birth, miscarriage and management of anaemia during pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Children’s Funds. Maternal Mortality. 2019. https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/ Accessed on 10 Jan 2020.

  2. Ghodke B, Pusukuru R, Mehta, V. Association of lipid profile in pregnancy with preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm delivery. Cureus. 2017;9(7).  https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1420

  3. World Health Organisation. Maternal Mortality. 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality Accessed on 10 Jan 2020.

  4. Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iyawa GE, Herselman M, Botha A. Digital health innovation ecosystems: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Procedia Computer Science. 2016;100:244–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iyawa G, Botha A, Herselman M. Identifying and defining the terms and elements related to a digital health innovation ecosystem. In: Herselman M, Botha A, editors. Strategies, Approaches and Experiences: Towards building a South African Digital Health Innovation Ecosystem. Pretoria: CSIR; 2016. p. 30–58.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iyawa GE, Langan-Martin J, Sevalie S, Masikara W. mHealth as tools for development in mental health. In: In McHaney, W, Reychev, I, Azuri, J, McHaney, ME, Moshonov (ed). Impacts of Information Technology on Patient Care and Empowerment, Hershey, IGI Global; 2020. p. 58–80.

  8. Stankevich E, Paramonov I, Timofeev I. Mobile phone sensors in health applications. In 2012 12th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT):IEEE; 2012, November. p. 1–6.

  9. Statland JM, Wang Y, Richesson R, Bundy B, Herbelin L, Gomes J, Trivedi J, Venance SL, Amato AA, Hanna MG, Griggs RC, Barohn RJ, and the CINCH Consortium. An interactive voice response diary for patients with non-dystrophic myotonia. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44:3035.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huckvale K, Car M, Morrison C, Car J. Apps for asthma self-management: A systematic assessment of content and tools. BMC medicine. 2012;10(1):144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W. Mobile applications for diabetics: A systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balsam J, Ossandon M, Bruck HA, Lubensky I, Rasooly A. Low-cost technologies for medical diagnostics in low-resource settings. Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics. 2013;7(3):243–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coorey GM, Neubeck L, Mulley J, Redfern J. Effectiveness, acceptability and usefulness of mobile applications for cardiovascular disease self-management: Systematic review with meta-synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25(5):505–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehead L, Seaton P. The effectiveness of self-management mobile phone and tablet apps in long-term condition management: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan KL, Chen M. Effects of social media and mobile health apps on pregnancy care: meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019;7(1):e11836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amoakoh-Coleman M, Borgstein ABJ, Sondaal SF, Grobbee DE, Miltenburg AS, Verwijs M, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions targeting health care workers to improve pregnancy outcomes in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: A systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1409–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Silva RMD, Brasil CCP, Bezerra IC, Queiroz FFDSN. Mobile health technology for gestational care: Evaluation of the GestAção’s app. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2019;72:266–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Borgen I, Småstuen MC, Jacobsen AF, Garnweidner-Holme, LM., Fayyad, S, Noll, J, Lukasse, M. Effect of the Pregnant+ smartphone application in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomised controlled trial in Norway. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11).

  21. Li LJ, Aris IM, Han WM, Tan KH. A Promising Food-Coaching Intervention Program to Achieve Optimal Gestational Weight Gain in Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Smartphone App. JMIR Formative Research. 2019;3(4):e13013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marko KI, Ganju N, Krapf JM, Gaba ND, Brown JA, Benham JJ, Meltzer AC. A Mobile Prenatal Care App to Reduce In-Person Visits: Prospective Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019;7(5):e10520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kominiarek MA, Vyhmeister H, Balmert LC, Fairchild P, Tolo H, Grobman W, Simon M. Activity tracking devices in group prenatal care: A feasibility study. BioResearch Open Access. 2018;7(1):165–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo H, Zhang Y, Li P, Zhou P, Chen LM, Li SY. Evaluating the effects of mobile health intervention on weight management, glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Endocrinol Invest. 2019;42(6):709–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi J, Hyeon L, Lee J, Vittinghoff E, Fukuoka Y. mHealth physical activity intervention: A randomized pilot study in physically inactive pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(5):1091–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marko KI, Krapf JM, Meltzer AC, Oh J, Ganju N, Martinez AG, Gaba ND. Testing the feasibility of remote patient monitoring in prenatal care using a mobile app and connected devices: a prospective observational trial. JMIR research protocols. 2016;5(4):e200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Faherty LJ, Hantsoo L, Appleby D, Sammel MD, Bennett IM, Wiebe DJ. Movement patterns in women at risk for perinatal depression: Use of a mood-monitoring mobile application in pregnancy. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(4):746–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnamurti T, Davis AL, Wong-Parodi G, Fischhoff B, Sadovsky Y, Simhan HN. Development and testing of the Myhealthypregnancy app: A behavioral decision research-based tool for assessing and communicating pregnancy risk. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2017;5(4):e42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hantsoo L, Criniti S, Khan A, Moseley M, Kincler N, Faherty LJ, Bennett IM. A mobile application for monitoring and management of depressed mood in a vulnerable pregnant population. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;69(1):104–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nørgaard SK, Nichum VL, Barfred C, Juul HM, Secher AL, Ringholm L, Mathiesen ER. Use of the smartphone application" Pregnant with Diabetes". Danish Medical Journal. 2017;64(11).

  31. Tombor I, Beard E, Brown J, Shahab L, Michie S, West R. Randomized factorial experiment of components of the SmokeFree Baby smartphone application to aid smoking cessation in pregnancy. Transl Behav Med. 2018;9(4):583–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Skar JB, Garnweidner-Holme LM, Lukasse M, Terragni L. Women’s experiences with using a smartphone app (the Pregnant+ app) to manage gestational diabetes mellitus in a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2018;58:102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dodd JM, Louise J, Cramp C, Grivell RM, Moran LJ, Deussen AR. Evaluation of a smartphone nutrition and physical activity application to provide lifestyle advice to pregnant women: The SNAPP randomised trial. Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2018;14(1):e12502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kennelly MA, Ainscough K, Lindsay KL, O’Sullivan E, Gibney ER, McCarthy M, Hatunic M. Pregnancy Exercise and Nutrition with Smartphone Application Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):818–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Raichle CJ, Eckstein J, Lapaire O, Leonardi L, Brasier N, Vischer AS, Burkard T. Performance of a blood pressure smartphone app in pregnant women: The iPARR Trial (iPhone app compared with standard RR measurement). Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1164–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parsa S, Khajouei R, Baneshi MR, Aali BS. Improving the knowledge of pregnant women using a pre-eclampsia app: A controlled before and after study. Int J Med Informatics. 2019;125:86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aitken M, & Gauntlett C. Patient apps for improved healthcare from novelty to mainstream. 2013.

  38. Jeddi FR, Nabovati E, Amirazodi S. Features and effects of information technology-based interventions to improve self-management in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Syst. 2017;41(11):170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brzan PP, Rotman E, Pajnkihar M, Klanjsek P. Mobile applications for control and self management of diabetes: A systematic review. J Med Syst. 2016;40(9):210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gloria Ejehiohen Iyawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author GEI declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author ARD declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author AK declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Search Strategy

Database

Strategy

PubMed

(((("pregnant"[Title/Abstract] OR "antenatal"[Title/Abstract] OR "prenatal"[Title/Abstract] OR "expecting"[Title/Abstract])) AND ("mobile phone"[Title/Abstract] OR "mhealth"[Title/Abstract] OR "m-health"[Title/Abstract] OR "mHealth"[Title/Abstract] OR "m-Health"[Title/Abstract] OR "mobile health"[Title/Abstract] OR "smartphone"[Title/Abstract] OR "mobile app"[Title/Abstract] OR "mobile application"[Title/Abstract])) AND ("2009"[Date—Publication]: "2019"[Date—Publication]))

Scopus

(("pregnant" OR "pregnancy" OR "antenatal" OR "prenatal" OR "expecting") AND ("mobile phone" OR "mhealth" OR mhealth "OR " m-health " OR " mobile AND health "OR " smartphone "OR " mobile AND app " OR " mobile AND application))

CINAHL

("pregnant" OR "pregnancy" OR "antenatal" OR "prenatal" OR "expecting")—Title

AND ("mobile phone" OR "mhealth" OR mhealth " OR " m-health " OR " mobile AND health " OR " smartphone" OR " mobile AND app " OR " mobile AND application) – Title

EMBASE

("pregnant" OR "pregnancy" OR "antenatal" OR "prenatal" OR "expecting") – Title/Abstract

AND ("mobile phone" OR "mhealth" OR mhealth " OR " m-health " OR " mobile AND health " OR " smartphone" OR " mobile AND app " OR " mobile AND application) – Title/Abstract

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iyawa, G.E., Dansharif, A.R. & Khan, A. Mobile apps for self-management in pregnancy: a systematic review. Health Technol. 11, 283–294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00523-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00523-z

Keywords

Navigation