Skip to main content
Log in

Octahedron pore architecture to enhance flexibility of nasal implant-shaped scaffold for rhinoplasty

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is a part of ongoing research conducted to develop an ideal implant for augmentation rhinoplasty using a combination of cartilage tissue engineering and 3D printing (3DP) techniques. A promising nasal implant-shaped (NIS) scaffold for rhinoplasty should have flexibility similar enough to native cartilage tissue to maintain its mechanical stability after implantation into a nose. In scaffold fabrication using 3DP, the pore pattern or architecture has a significant effect on the mechanical properties of a scaffold. In this study, we proposed octahedron pore architecture inspired by a zigzag spring, which stores more mechanical energy than a simple rod. Therefore, we assumed that the scaffold having octahedron pore architecture is more flexible than one that has the cube or lattice pore architecture that is widely used in tissue engineering based on 3DP. To verify this assumption, scaffolds having octahedron, cube, or lattice pore architecture with the same porosity and same unit cell size were fabricated using projection-based micro-stereolithography and sacrificial molding, and their mechanical behaviors were analyzed using compression and three-point bending tests. Compared to the other pore types, the octahedron pore architecture had superior flexibility, which is beneficial for clinical application of NIS scaffolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vuyk, H. D. and Adamson, P. A., “Biomaterials in Rhinoplasty,” Clinical Otolaryngology, Vol. 23, No.3, pp. 209–217, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin, G. and Lawson, W., “Complications using Grafts and Implants in Rhinoplasty,” Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 315–323, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, T., Zein, I., Ng, K. W., Teoh, S. H., and Tan, K. C., “Mechanical Properties and Cell Cultural Response of Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Designed and Fabricated Via Fused Deposition Modeling,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 203–216, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zein, I., Hutmacher, D. W., Tan, K. C., and Teoh, S. H., “Fused Deposition Modeling of Novel Scaffold Architectures for Tissue Engineering Applications,” Biomaterials, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1169–1185, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tham, C., Lai, Y. L., Weng, C. J., and Chen, Y. R., “Silicone Augmentation Rhinoplasty in an Oriental Population,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 1–5, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seol, Y. J., Kang, T. Y., and Cho, D. W., “Solid Freeform Fabrication Technology Applied to Tissue Engineering with Various Biomaterials,” Soft Matter, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 1730–1735, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sohn, Y. S., Jung, J. W., Kim, J. Y., and Cho, D. W., “Investigation of Bi-Pore Scaffold based on the Cell Behaviors on 3D Scaffold Patterns,” Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 66–72, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ciocca, L., De Crescenzio, F., Fantini, M., and Scotti, R., “CAD/CAM and Rapid Prototyped Scaffold Construction for Bone Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Transfer of Virtual Planning: A Pilot Study,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 58–62, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huey, D. J., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A., “Unlike Bone, Cartilage Regeneration Remains Elusive,” Science, Vol. 338, No. 6109, pp. 917–921, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xia, W., Liu, W., Cui, L., Liu, Y., Zhong, W., et al., “Tissue Engineering of Cartilage with the Use of ChitosanGelatin Complex Scaffolds,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 373–380, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Y., Ameer, G. A., Sheppard, B. J., and Langer, R., “A Tough Biodegradable Elastomer,” Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 602–606, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung, Y., Park, M. S., Lee, J. W., Kim, Y. H., Kim, S. H., and Kim, S. H., “Cartilage Regeneration with Highly-Elastic Three-Dimensional Scaffolds Prepared from Biodegradable Poly (L-Lactide-Co—Caprolactone),” Biomaterials, Vol. 29, No. 35, pp. 4630–4636, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J. S., Cha, H. D., Shim, J. H., Jung, J. W., Kim, J. Y., and Cho, D. W., “Effect of Pore Architecture and Stacking Direction on Mechanical Properties of Solid Freeform Fabricationbased Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Vol. 100, No. 7, pp. 1846–1853, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang, H. W., Park, J. H., Kang, T. Y., Seol, Y. J., and Cho, D. W., “Unit Cell-based Computer-Aided Manufacturing System for Tissue Engineering,” Biofabrication, Vol. 4, No. 1, Paper No. 015005, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoo, D. J., “Porous Scaffold Design using the Distance Field and Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Models,” Biomaterials, Vol. 32, No. 31, pp. 7741–7754, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun, W., Starly, B., Nam, J., and Darling, A., “Bio-CAD Modeling and Its Applications in Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1097–1114, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Komatsubara, M., Namazu, T., Nagasawa, H., Tsurui, T., and Inoue, S., “Cylindrical Film Deposition System for Three-Dimensional Titanium-Nickel Shape Memory Alloy Microstructure,” Vacuum, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 703–707, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tawney, G. L., “Zigzag and Helical Springs; Elastic Properties of Molybdenum,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 152–159, 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung, J. W., Kang, H. W., Kang, T. Y., Park, J. H., Park, J., and Cho, D.-W., “Projection Image-Generation Algorithm for Fabrication of a Complex Structure using Projection-based Microstereolithography,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 445–449, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liska, R., Schwager, F., Maier, C., CanoVives, R., and Stampfl, J., “WaterSoluble Photopolymers for Rapid Prototyping of Cellular Materials,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 2286–2298, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang, H. W. and Cho, D. W., “Development of an Indirect Stereolithography Technology for Scaffold Fabrication with a Wide Range of Biomaterial Selectivity,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 719–729, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang, H. W., Seol, Y. J., and Cho, D. W., “Development of an Indirect Solid Freeform Fabrication Process based on Microstereolithography for 3D Porous Scaffolds,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 19, No. 1, Paper No. 015011, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan, Y., Zhao, X., Zhou, C., and Chen, Y., “Smooth Surface Fabrication in Mask Projection based Stereolithography,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 460–470, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Atala, A. and Mooney, D. J., “Synthetic Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds,” Springer, pp. 1–12, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Neuendorf, R. E., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A. P., and Ritchie, R. O., “Adhesion between Biodegradable Polymers and Hydroxyapatite: Relevance to Synthetic Bone-like Materials and Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” Acta Biomaterialia, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 1288–1296, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lutz, J. F. and Hoth, A., “Preparation of Ideal Peg Analogues with a Tunable Thermosensitivity by Controlled Radical Copolymerization of 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy) Ethyl Methacrylate and Oligo (ethylene glycol) Methacrylate,” Macromolecules, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 893–896, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen, T. Q. and Kausch, H. H., “Molecular Weight Distribution and Mechanical Properties,” Mechanical Properties and Testing of Polymers, Vol. 3, pp. 143–150, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Melchels, F. P., Bertoldi, K., Gabbrielli, R., Velders, A. H., Feijen, J., and Grijpma, D. W., “Mathematically Defined Tissue Engineering Scaffold Architectures Prepared by Stereolithography,” Biomaterials, Vol. 31, No. 27, pp. 6909–6916, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Woo Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung, J.W., Park, J.H., Hong, J.M. et al. Octahedron pore architecture to enhance flexibility of nasal implant-shaped scaffold for rhinoplasty. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 2611–2616 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0634-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0634-0

Keywords

Navigation