Skip to main content
Log in

Strain hardening behavior during manufacturing of tube shapes by hydroforming

  • Published:
Metals and Materials International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Safe and robust process design relies on knowledge of the evolution of the mechanical properties in a tube during hydroforming. The manufacturing of tubular shapes generally consists of three main stages: bending, preforming, and expansion. The latter is usually called hydroforming. As a result of these three steps, the final product’s strain hardening history is nonlinear. In the present study, the strain hardening behavior during hydroforming was experimentally investigated. The variation of local flow stress and/or local hardness was used as an index of the strain hardening during the various steps and the local flow stress and/or local hardness were used with respective correlations to determine the effective strain. The strain hardening behavior during hydroforming after preforming has been successfully analyzed by using the relationships between hardness, flow stress, and effective strain for variable pre-strains prior to hydroforming. The comparison of predicted hardness with measured hardness confirms that the methodology used in this study is feasible, and that the strain hardening behavior can be quantitatively estimated with good accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. B. Sim, K. S. Cho, K. B. Lee, H. R. Yang and H. Kwon, J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 45, 101 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Ray and B. J. MacDonald, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47, 1498 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Chu and Y. Xu, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46, 263 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Y. Kim, H. T. Lim, H. J. Kim, and D. J. Lee, Met. Mater. Int. 13, 87 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. S. Levy, C. J. Van Tyne, and J. M. Stringfield, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 150, 280 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Bortot, E. Ceretti, and C. Giardini, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 203, 381 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. J. Song, J. Kim, and B. S. Kang, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 191, 368 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Nemat-Alla, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 45, 605 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Strano and T. Altan, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 146, 92 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Xu, L. C. Chen, Y. C. Tsien, L. Gao, and P. F. Zheng, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 201, 413 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ko Manuf. 41, 761 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Hill, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 193, 281 (1948).

    Article  MATH  CAS  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1950).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Hoon Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, H.K., Yi, H.K., Van Tyne, C.J. et al. Strain hardening behavior during manufacturing of tube shapes by hydroforming. Met. Mater. Int. 15, 897–902 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-009-0897-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-009-0897-7

Keywords

Navigation