Skip to main content
Log in

Engagement in New Dietary Habits—Obese Women’s Experiences from Participating in a 2-Year Diet Intervention

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dietary weight loss interventions most often result in weight loss, but weight maintenance on a long-term basis is the main problem in obesity treatment. There is a need for an increased understanding of the behaviour patterns involved in adopting a new dietary behavior and to maintain the behaviour over time.

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore overweight and obese middle-aged women’s experiences of the dietary change processes when participating in a 2-year-long diet intervention.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 12 overweight and obese women (54–71 years) were made after their participation in a diet intervention programme. The programme was designed as a RCT study comparing a diet according to the Nordic nutrition recommendations (NNR diet) and a Palaeolithic diet (PD). Interviews were analysed according to Grounded Theory principles.

Results

A core category “Engagement phases in the process of a diet intervention” concluded the analysis. Four categories included the informants’ experiences during different stages of the process of dietary change: “Honeymoon phase”, “Everyday life phase”, “It’s up to you phase” and “Crossroads phase”. The early part of the intervention period was called “Honeymoon phase” and was characterised by positive experiences, including perceived weight loss and extensive support. The next phases, the “Everyday life phase” and “It’s up to you phase”, contained the largest obstacles to change. The home environment appeared as a crucial factor, which could be decisive for maintenance of the new dietary habits or relapse into old habits in the last phase called “Crossroads phase”.

Conclusion

We identified various phases of engagement in the process of a long-term dietary intervention among middle-aged women. A clear personal goal and support from family and friends seem to be of major importance for long-term maintenance of new dietary habits. Gender relations within the household must be considered as a possible obstacle for women engaging in diet intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dombrowski S, Knittle K, Avenell A, Araújo-Soares V, Sniehotta F. Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2014;348:g2646. doi:10.1136/bmj.g2646.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwingshackl L, Dias S, Hoffman G. Impact of long-term lifestyle programmes on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight/obese participants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014;3:130. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-130.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lieberman A, Robbins J, Terras A. Why some adolescents loose weight and others do not: a qualitative study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101(5):439–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopez K. Value conflict: the lived experiences of women in treatment for weight loss. Health Care Women Int. 1997;18(6):603–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(10):1755–67. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.07.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffery RW, Kelly KM, Rothman AJ, Sherwood NE, Boutelle KN. The weight loss experience: a descriptive analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(2):100–6. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2702_4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Östberg AL, Wikstrand I, Benggtsson BK. Group treatment of obesity in primary care practice: a qualitative study of patients’ perspectives. Scand J Publ Health. 2011;39:98–105. doi:10.1177/1403494810391524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chambers JA, Swanson V. Stories of weight management: factors associated with successful and unsuccessful weight maintenance. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):223–43. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02030.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Byrne S, Cooper Z, Fairburn C. Weight maintenance and relapse in obesity: a qualitative study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(8):955–62. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reyes NR, Oliver TL, Klotz AA, et al. Similarities and differences between weight loss maintainers and regainers: a qualitative analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(4):499–505. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2011.11.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson-Askew WL, Fisher RA, Yaroch AL. Decision making in eating behavior: state of the science and recommendations for future research. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38 Suppl 1:S88–92. doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9125-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sciamanna CN, Kiernan M, Rolls BJ, et al. Practices associated with weight loss versus weight-loss maintenance results of a national survey. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):159–66. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rothman AJ. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1 Suppl):64–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross K. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviours. Am Psychol. 1992;42:1102–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Povey R, Conner M, Sparks P, James R, Shepard R. A critical examination of the Transtheoretical Model’s stage pf change to dietary behaviours. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:641–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carr MC. The emergence of the metabolic syndrome with menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):2404–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindeberg S, Jonsson T, Granfeldt Y, et al. A Palaeolithic diet improves glucose tolerance more than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischaemic heart disease. Diabetologia. 2007;50(9):1795–807. doi:10.1007/s00125-007-0716-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frassetto LA, Schloetter M, Mietus-Synder M, Morris Jr RC, Sebastian A. Metabolic and physiologic improvements from consuming a paleolithic, hunter-gatherer type diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(8):947–55. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2009.4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(9):859–73. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0804748.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Due A, Toubro S, Skov AR, Astrup A. Effect of normal-fat diets, either medium or high in protein, on body weight in overweight subjects: a randomised 1-year trial. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28(10):1283–90. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Astrup A, Toubro S, Raben A, Skov AR. The role of low-fat diets and fat substitutes in body weight management: what have we learned from clinical studies? J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97(7 Suppl):S82–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mellberg C, Sandberg S, Ryberg M, et al. Long-term effects of a Paleolitic-type diet in obese postmenopausal women: a 2-year randomized trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(3):350–7. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.290.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Glaser B, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lauria MW, Moreira LM, Machado-Coelho GL, Neto RM, Soares MM, Ramos AV. Ability of body mass index to predict abnormal waist circumference: receiving operation characteristics analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2013;5(1):74. doi:10.1186/1758-5996-5-74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Minicozzi P, Berrino F, Sebastiani F, et al. High fasting blood glucose and obesity significantly and independently increase risk of breast cancer death in hormone receptor-positive disease. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:3881–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Said Q, Marx C, Schwartz J, Ben-Joseph R, Brixner D. Impact of body mass index on the incidence of cardiometabolic risk factors in ambulatory care settings over 5-years or more. Value Health. 2010;13:265–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Öhman A. Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Med. 2005;27:273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ryden PJ, Sydner YM. Implementing and sustaining dietary change in the context of social relationships. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25(3):583–90. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00867.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammarström A, Wiklund A, Lindahl B, Larsson C, Ahlgren C. Experiences of barriers and facilitators to weight-loss in a diet intervention - a qualitative study of women in Northern Sweden. BMC Womens Health. 2014;16(14):59. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Beagan BL, Chapman GE. Family influences on food choice: context of surviving breast cancer. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004;36(6):320–6. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60402-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown NA, Smith KC, Kromm EE. Women’s perceptions of the relationship between recent life events, transitions, and diet in midlife: findings from a focus group study. Women Health. 2012;52(3):234–51. doi:10.1080/03630242.2012.658493.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hepworth J. Gender and the capacity of women with NIDDM to implement medical advice. Scand J Public Health. 1999;27(4):260–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Radakovich K, Heilbrun LK, Venkatranamamoorthy R, Lababidi S, Klurfeld DM, Djuric Z. Women participating in a dietary intervention trial maintain dietary changes without much effect on household members. Nutr Cancer. 2006;55(1):44–52. doi:10.1207/s15327914nc5501_6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kearney MH, Rosal MC, Ockene JK, Churchill LC. Influences on older women’s adherence to a low-fat diet in the Women’s Health Initiative. Psychosom Med. 2002;64(3):450–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zimmerman GL, Olsen CG, Bosworth MF. A ‘stages of change’ approach to helping patients change behavior. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(5):1409–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Artinian NT, Fletcher GF, Mozaffarian D, et al. Interventions to promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(4):406–41. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181e8edf1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Gool CH, Penninx BW, Kempen GI, et al. Determinants of high and low attendance to diet and exercise interventions among overweight and obese older adults. Results from the arthritis, diet, and activity promotion trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2006;27(3):227–37. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2005.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Williamson DA, Anton SD, Han H, et al. Early behavioral adherence predicts short and long-term weight loss in the pounds lost study. J Behav Med. 2010;33(4):305–14. doi:10.1007/s10865-010-9253-0.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Di Noia J, Prochaska J. Dietary stages of change and decisional balance: a meta-analytic review. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34:618–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wing RR, Tate DF, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, Fava JL. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1563–71. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061883.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Michie S, Abraham C. Interventions to change health behaviours: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? Psychol Health. 2004;19(1):29–49. doi:10.1080/0887044031000141199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lang A, Froelicher ES. Management of overweight and obesity in adults: behavioral intervention for long-term weight loss and maintenance. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;5(2):102–14. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Laddu D, Dow C, Hingle M, Thomson C, Going S. A review of evidence-based strategies to treat obesity in adults. Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26(5):512–25. doi:10.1177/0884533611418335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank David Ekholm for valuable help with interviewing. This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2006–0699 and 2010–0398), the Swedish Research Council (K2011-12237-15-6), the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, the County Council of Västerbotten, and Umeå University, Sweden.

Ethical standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation the Ethical Review Board at Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden (Dnr 07-034M) and with the Helsinki declaration of 1975 as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all informants for being included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Ahlgren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahlgren, C., Hammarström, A., Sandberg, S. et al. Engagement in New Dietary Habits—Obese Women’s Experiences from Participating in a 2-Year Diet Intervention. Int.J. Behav. Med. 23, 84–93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9495-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9495-x

Keywords

Navigation