Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking serious game narratives with pedagogical theories and pedagogical design strategies

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Narrative-based serious games present pedagogical content and interventions through an interactive narrative. To ensure effective learning in such kind of serious games, designers are not only faced with the challenge of creating a compelling narrative, but also with the additional challenge of incorporating suitable pedagogical strategies. Therefore, development teams must consist of a multidisciplinary group including storytellers, technical staff and pedagogical experts to make sure that suitable pedagogical strategies are incorporated into the narrative. In this paper, the authors show how the Domain Specific Modeling Language ATTAC-L, for modeling the narrative of a serious game, allows creating the link between the processes of pedagogical design and narrative modeling by means of an elaborate annotation system. As such, this modeling language enables different experts to concentrate on the aspects related to their field of expertise without losing oversight of the serious game as a whole. More in particular, we will show how the annotation system can be used to document and integrate the use of a well-grounded pedagogical theory, Social Cognitive Theory, for achieving the goals of a serious game, as well as when the serious game is part of a program developed by means of a well-grounded design strategy, Intervention Mapping Protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.storybricks.org (project discontinued since 03-05-2015).

References

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnab, S., Brown, K., Clarke, S., Dunwell, I., Lim, T., Suttie, N., et al. (2013). The development approach of a pedagogically-driven serious game to support Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) within a classroom setting. Computers & Education, 69, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnab, S., & Clarke, S. (2016). Towards a trans-disciplinary methodology for a game-based intervention development process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 279–312.

  • Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., Freitas, S., Louchart, S., et al. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baalsrud-Hauge, J. M., Stanescu, I. A., Arnab, S., Ger, P. M., Lim, T., Serrano-Laguna, A., et al. (2015). Learning through analytics architecture to scaffold learning experience through technology-based methods. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Volume 6 six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., & Arici, A. (2009). Transformational play: Why educators should care about games. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., & Fernandez, M. E. (2011). Planning health promotion program: An intervention mapping approach (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Beatty, I. D. (2014). Gaming the system: Video games as a theoretical framework for instructional design. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1401.6716.

  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M., Webb, M., Durkin, L. A., & Hickie, I. B. (2010). Reach Out Central: A serious game designed to engage young men to improve mental health and wellbeing. Medical Journal of Australia, 192(11), S27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1985). Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17(3), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1987). Translating cognition into action: The role of visual guidance in observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(3), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Sedano, C. I., Hauge, J. B., et al. (2015). An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Computers & Education, 87, 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, C. E., Luccini, A. M., & Mortara, M. (2014). Guidelines for an effective design of serious games. International Journal of Serious Games, 1(1). doi:10.17083/ijsg.v1i1.8.

  • Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Troyer, O., & Janssens, E. (2014). Supporting the requirement analysis phase for the development of serious games for children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSmet, A., Van Cleemput, K., Bastiaensens, S., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Malliet, S., et al. (2016). Bridging behavior science and gaming theory: Using the Intervention Mapping Protocol to design a serious game against cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friendly ATTAC (2012). Friendly ATTAC. Retrieved from: http://www.friendlyattac.be/en/.

  • Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1975). Educational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction Robert Gagné. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel, S., Mehm, F., Radke, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). 80 days: Adaptive digital storytelling for digital educational games. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games (STEG’09) (Vol. 498, No. 498).

  • Göbel, S., Salvatore, L., & Konrad, R. (2008). StoryTec: A digital storytelling platform for the authoring and experiencing of interactive and non-linear stories. In Automated solutions for cross media content and multi-channel distribution, 2008. AXMEDIS’08. International Conference on (pp. 103–110). IEEE.

  • Göransson, B., Gulliksen, J., & Boivie, I. (2003). The usability design process: Integrating user-centered systems design in the software development process. Software Process Improvement and Practice: Special Issue on Bridging the Process and Practice Gaps Between Software Engineering and Human Computer Interaction, 8(2), 111–131.

  • Gunter, G., Kenny, R. F., & Vick, E. H. (2006). A case for a formal design paradigm for serious games. The Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hergenhahn, B. R. (1988). Introduction to the theories of learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirdes, E. M., Thillainathan, N., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Towards modeling educational objectives in serious games. In Pedagogically-driven Serious Games 2012 Saarbrücken, Germany (Vol. 898, pp. 11–14). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.

  • Ke, F. (2016). Designing and integrating purposeful learning in game play: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, 1, 383–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., & Tolvanen, J. P. (2008). Domain-specific modeling: enabling full code generation. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Schwarz, D., Albert, D., Verpoorten, D., Castaigne, J. L., & Bopp, M. (2006). The elektra project: Towards a new learning experience. In USAB (pp. 19–48).

  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkley, S. E., Tomblin, S., & Kirkley, J. (2005). Instructional design authoring support for the development of serious games and mixed reality training. In Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).

  • Kok, G., Harterink, P., Vriens, P., De Zwart, O., & Hospers, H. J. (2006). The gay cruise: Developing a theory-and evidence-based internet HIV-prevention intervention. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 3(2), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, C. A. (2005). Story and narrative structures in computer games. In B. Bushoff (Ed.), Developing Interactive Narrative Content. sagas_sagasnet_reader. Munich: High Text Verlag.

  • Marchiori, E. J., Del Blanco, Á., Torrente, J., Martinez-Ortiz, I., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2011). A visual language for the creation of narrative educational games. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 22(6), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, J., Kok, G., & Hospers, H. J. (2008). Queermasters: Developing a theory-and evidence-based internet HIV-prevention intervention to promote HIV-testing among men who have sex with men (MSM). Applied Psychology, 57(4), 681–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social learning and cognition. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 465–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D., Baranowski, T., Buday, R., Baranowski, J., Thompson, V., Jago, R., et al. (2010). Serious video games for health how behavioral science guided the development of a serious video game. Simulation & Gaming, 41(4), 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrente, J., Del Blanco, Á., Marchiori, E. J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2010). < e-Adventure > : Introducing educational games in the learning process. In IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference (pp. 1121–1126). IEEE.

  • Tran, C., George, S., & Marfisi-Schottman, I. (2010). EDoS: An authoring environment for serious games. Design based on three models. In Proceedings of ECGBL 2010 the 4th European conference on games based learning. 4th ECGBL (pp. 393–402).

  • Valcke, M. (2005). Onderwijskunde als ontwerpwetenschap (3rd ed.). Gent: Academia Press.

  • Van Broeckhoven, F., & De Troyer, O. (2013). ATTAC-L: A modeling language for educational virtual scenarios in the context of preventing cyber bullying. In Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2013 IEEE 2nd International Conference on (pp. 1–8). IEEE.

  • Van Broeckhoven, F., & De Troyer, O. (2014). Specifying the pedagogical aspects of narrative-based digital learning games using annotations. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on the foundations of digital games. Society for the advancement of the science of digital games.

  • Van Broeckhoven, F., Vlieghe, J., & De Troyer, O. (2015). Using a controlled natural language for specifying the narratives of serious games. In International conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 142–153). Springer International Publishing.

  • Weiss, S., Müller, W., Spierling, U., & Steimle, F. (2005). Scenejo–an interactive storytelling platform. In International Conference on Virtual Storytelling (pp. 77–80). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by IWT (Institute for Science and Technology) (http://www.iwt.be) under the Friendly ATTAC project. We also like to thank our colleagues of the Friendly ATTAC project for the fruitful cooperation resulting in a lot of improvements for ATTAC-L.

Funding

This study was funded by IWT-SBO (Grant number 110051).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Group WISE, Department of Computer Science, WISE - 10F703, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Olga De Troyer, Frederik Van Broeckhoven & Joachim Vlieghe

Authors
  1. Olga De Troyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frederik Van Broeckhoven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joachim Vlieghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Van Broeckhoven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Troyer, O., Van Broeckhoven, F. & Vlieghe, J. Linking serious game narratives with pedagogical theories and pedagogical design strategies. J Comput High Educ 29, 549–573 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9142-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9142-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation