Skip to main content
Log in

A contribution to the taxonomy of Spio (Spionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) occurring in the North and Baltic Seas, with a key to species recorded in this area

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biodiversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to resolve taxonomic problems known from literature and diagnostic practices, Spio species currently recognised in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea have been re-examined. Spio species recorded in the area of interest are S. decoratus, Spio cf. filicornis, S. goniocephala, S. martinensis, and S. armata. Spio decoratus is restricted to the North Sea, whereas S. armata occurs only in the Baltic Sea. Revised descriptions with illustrations and notes on the distributions, as well as remarks on size-dependent differences of characters, are presented for all species. Specimens of Spio from the North and Baltic Seas, which are assigned to S. filicornis based on current taxonomic literature, exhibit significant morphological differences, and are here regarded as two different species. A definite assignment of specimens from the two morphological distinct groups to one of the known Spio species was impossible based on the material available. The significance of diagnostic characters used for the identification of Spio spp. is discussed. An identification key to Spio species found in the investigation area is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augener H (1914) Polychaeta II: sedentaria. In: Michaelsen W, Hartmeyer R (eds) Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens. Ergebnisse der Hamburger südwest-australischen Forschungsreise l905, vol 5. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 1–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergfeld C, Kröncke I (2003) Spio martinensis Mesnil, 1896 (Polychaeta, Spionidae): not a new record in German coastal waters of the North Sea. Senck marit 32:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bick A, Gosselck F (1985) Arbeitsschlüssel zur Bestimmung der Polychaeten der Ostsee. Mitt Mus Natkd Berl 61:171–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bick A (2005) A new Spionidae (Polychaeta) from North Carolina, and a redescription of Marenzellera wireni Augener, 1913, from Spitsbergen, with a key for all species of Marenzelleria. Helgol Mar Res 59:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake JA (1996) Family Spionidae Grube 1850. In: Blake JA, Hilbig B, Scott PH (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel, Vol 6: The Annelida. Part 3: Polychaeta: Orbiniidae to Cossuridae. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, pp 81–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JA, Kudenov JD (1978) The Spionidae (Polychaeta) from southeastern Australia and adjacent areas, with a revision of the genera. Mem Natl Mus Vic 39:171–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobretzky NV (1870) Materialy dlja fauny Tschernovo Morya. Annelidy (Annelida, Polychaeta). Zapisy Kievskovo obshestva estestroispytatelej 1:188–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Böggemann M (1997) Polychaeten aus der Deutschen Bucht—Taxonomische Bearbeitung und Dokumentation der vom Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg hauptsächlich in der Deutschen Bucht gesammelten Polychaeten. Cour Forsch Inst Senck 202:1–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvin JC (1989) Sur la présence de Spio decoratus Bobretzky, 1871 en Manche et remarques sur Spio martinensis Mesnil, 1896 et Spio filicornis (O.F. Müller, 1776). Cah Biol Mar 30:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Day JH (1973) New Polychaeta from Beaufort, with a key to all species recorded from North Carolina. NOAA Technical Report, NMFS Circular 375, pp 1–140

  • Fabricius O (1780) Fauna Groenlandica, systematica sistens, animalia Groenlandiae occidentalis hactenus indagata, quad nomen specificum, triviale, vernaculumque; synonyma auctorum plurium, descriptionem, locom victum, generationem, mores, usum, capturamque singuli; prout detegendi occasion fuit, maximaque parti secundum proprias observations. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Fabricius O (1785) Von dem Spio-Geschlecht einem neuen Wurmgeschlecht Nereis seticornis und Nereis filicornis. Sitzungsbericht der Gesellschaft der naturforschenden Freunde zu Berlin 6:256–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster NM (1971) Spionidae (Polychaeta) of the gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Stud Fauna Curaçao other Caribb Isl 36:1–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordanella E (1969) Contribution a l’étude de quelques Spionidae. Recl Trav Stn Mar Endoume 45:325–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin JP (1972) Rapports taxonomiques et développement larvaire de Spio decoratus Bobretzky, 1871 (Annélide, Polychète). Cah Biol Mar 13:321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz L (1956) Larval development of the polychaete families Spionidae Sars, Disomidae Mesnil, and Poecilochaetidae n. fam. in the Gullmar Fjord (Sweden). Zool Bidr Upps 31:1–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Schröder G (1971) Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta, Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 58. Gustav Fischer, Jena

  • Hartmann-Schröder G (1996) Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta, 2nd edn. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 58. Gustav Fischer, Jena, Stuttgart, Lübeck, Ulm

  • Holmquist C (1967) Marenzelleria wireni Augener—a polychaete found in fresh waters of northern Alaska—with taxonomical considerations on some related spionid worms. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 5:298–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelsing J (2002) Ultrastructural Investigations on the cephalic and metameric nuchal organs of Spio cf. filicornis (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Zoomorphology 121:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelsing J (2003) Ultrastructural studies of dorsal ciliated organs in Spionidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Hydrobiologia 496:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maciolek NJ (1990) A redescription of some species belonging to the genera Spio and Microspio (Polychaeta: Annelida) and descriptions of three new species from the northwestern Atlantic Ocean. J Nat Hist 24:1109–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meißner K (2005) Revision of the genus Spiophanes (Polychaeta, Spionidae); with new synonymies, new records and descriptions of new species. Mitt Mus Natkd Berl, Zoologische Reihe 81:3–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil F (1896) Études de morphologie externe chez les Annélides. I. Les Spionidiens des côtes de la Manche. Bull Sci Fr Belg 29:110–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller OF (1776) Zoologicae Danicae Prodromus, seu Animalium Daniae et Norvegiae indigenarum characteres, nomina et synonyma imprimis popularium. Hallageriis, Copenhagen

  • Sikorski AV (2001) Spionidae Grube, 1850. In: Jirkov IA (ed) Polychaeta of the Arctic Ocean. Yanus—K Press, Moscow, pp 271–332

  • Sikorski AV (2002) On distinguishing the morphologically close species, Laonice cirrata and Laonice bahusiensis (Polychaeta, Spionidae). Zool Zh 81:406–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon JL (1967) Reproduction and larval development of Spio setosa (Spionidae: Polychaeta). Bull Mar Sci 17:398–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon JL (1968) Occurrence of pelagic larvae in Spio setosa Verrill, 1873 (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Biol Bull 134:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström A (1920) Studien über die Polychaetenfamilie Spionidae. Dissertation, Almquist and Wicksells, Uppsala, pp 1–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Thulin G (1957) Über einige Spioniden (Polychaeta) aus dem Öresund. Kungl. Fysiografiska Sällskapets i Lund Förhandlingar 27:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsaae K (1999) On the taxonomy of Spio filicornis (Spionidae, Polychaeta)—Nipisat, Disco, Greenland. Ber Polarforsch 330:164–169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank James A. Blake, Nancy J. Maciolek and three anonymous referees, who reviewed a previous draft of this manuscript. Their comments greatly improved the quality of the paper. We would like to thank Volker Schroeren (LANU), Karin Fürhaupter (MariLim), Michael Zettler (IOW), Regine Bönsch (IfAOE), Katrine Worsaae and Danny Eibye-Jacobsen (ZMUC) and Dieter Fiege (SMF) for making their collections available to us. Type material was supplied by Lars R. Lundqvist from Zoologiska Museet, Lunds Universitet, Sweden (L). Tatyana Nikitenkova (IfAOE) translated Russian publications. We are grateful to Prof. Ludwig Jonas, Gerhard Fulda and Wolfgang Labs from the Electron Microscopic Centre of the Medical Faculty of the University of Rostock for their support. The study was funded in part by the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany under FKZ 370725201.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Bick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bick, A., Otte, K. & Meißner, K. A contribution to the taxonomy of Spio (Spionidae, Polychaeta, Annelida) occurring in the North and Baltic Seas, with a key to species recorded in this area. Mar Biodiv 40, 161–180 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-010-0040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-010-0040-5

Keywords

Navigation