Skip to main content
Log in

What are users’ intentions towards real money trading in massively multiplayer online games?

  • General Research
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates user behaviour in massively multiplayer online games from the perspective of their intentions to engage in real money trading. Players who engage in real money trading purchase resources instead of spending time to acquire them in the game. This behaviour influences not just their own gaming experience, but those of other players as well as the operator’s revenues. We present an online survey which targets the players of World of Warcraft. Players’ relationships with real money trading are investigated using insights from behavioural economics. We propose a model which includes a set of behavioural determinants grounded in empirical research on online games. The study’s findings indicate that a player’s social status and the disinhibiting effects of online play are positive influences on players’ intentions to engage in real money trading, while perceived fairness, anticipated regret and uncertainty about the seller’s behaviour are negative influences. Interestingly, neither the perceived enjoyment nor the potential punishments influence intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/

References

  • Alexander, C., & Becker, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, R. A. (2003). Designing virtual worlds: New Riders Games.

  • Bartle, R. A. (2004). Pitfalls of virtual property. The Themis Group, Available at: http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/povp.pdf

  • Burstin, K., Doughtie, E. B., & Raphaeli, A. (1980). Contrastive vignette technique: an indirect methodology designed to address reactive social attitude measurement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castronova, E. (2003). On virtual economies. Game Studies: the International Journal of Computer Game Research, 3(2).

  • Castronova, E. (2006). A cost-benefit analysis of real-money trade in the products of synthetic economies. Info, 8(6), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Chen, J., & Ross, W. (2010). Antecedents of online game dependency: the implications of multimedia realism and uses and gratifications theory. Journal of Database Management, 21(2), 69–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role playing gamers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 575–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consalvo, M. (2007). Cheating: Gaining advantage in video games. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, N., & Kerr, A. H. (2010). “Woulda, coulda, shoulda”: a conceptual examination of the sources of postpurchase regret. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 18(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibbell, J. (2007). The life of the Chinese gold-farmer. The New York Times. June 17th.

  • Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. J. (2006). “Alone together?”: Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at the CHI ’06: SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, NY, USA.

  • Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85, 1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2007). Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money. The Database of Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harambam, J., Aupers, S., & Houtman, D. (2011). Game over? Negotiating modern capitalism in virtual game worlds. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14, 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2008). Current analysis and future research agenda on “gold farming”: Real-world production in developing countries for the virtual economies of online games. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 492–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehdonvirta, V. (2005). Real-money trade of virtual assets: Ten different user perceptions. In Proceedings of Digital Arts and Culture (DAC 2005), IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, December 1–3, 52–58.

  • Lehdonvirta, V. (2009). Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1–2), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lin, H., & Sun, C. T. (2007). Cash trade within the magic circle: Free-to-play game challenges and massively multiplayer online game player responses. Paper presented at DiGRA 2007: Situated Play, Tokyo.

  • Manninen, T., & Kujanpää, T. (2007). The value of virtual assets: the role of game characters in MMOGs. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 2, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, K. L., Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Harnessing our inner angels and demons: what we have learned about want/should conflicts and how that knowledge can help us reduce short-sighted decision making. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., & Kow, Y. M. (2010). Digital imaginiaries: How we know what we (think we) know about Chinese gold farming. First Monday, 15(6).

  • Passman, M. (2008). Transactions of virtual items in virtual worlds. Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, 18, 260–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviours. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robischon, N. (2006). Station exchange: Year one. Gamasutra Whitepaper. Available at: http://www.fredshouse.net/images/SOE%20Station%20Exchange%20White%20Paper%201.19.pdf

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. L. (2002). Whose game is this anyway? Negotiating corporate ownership in a virtual world. In Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, Tampere University Press, Tampere, 227–242.

  • Taylor, S. A. (2007). The addition of anticipated regret to attitudinally based, goal-directed models of information search behaviours under conditions of uncertainty and risk. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. S., Ishida, C., & Wallace, D. W. (2009). Intention to engage in digital piracy: a conceptual model and empirical test. Journal of Service Research, 11(3), 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N. (2005a). Motivations of play in MMORPGs. Paper presented at DiGRA 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

  • Yee, N. (2005b). “In their own words: The achievement component” from “The Daedalus Project” by Nick Yee. Available at: http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/archives/001300.php

  • Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision-making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We appreciate the thoughtful feedback of Robert Veitch on previous versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioanna Constantiou.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hans-Dieter Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Constantiou, I., Legarth, M.F. & Olsen, K.B. What are users’ intentions towards real money trading in massively multiplayer online games?. Electron Markets 22, 105–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0076-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0076-9

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation