Abstract
Microtransactions, in the form of loot boxes, are items in a digital game, bought with real money that contains semi-randomized content. They are a commonly used concept for monetarization in current games that are also often free to play. When purchasable items give players a decisive advantage in a game, people often call it pay-to-win: competitive advantages through real-money in-game purchases.
In this study, we analyze and identify different aspects of current video games, to assess, whether a game has partial, or strong pay-to-win elements. Within a user study of 96 participants, these aspects are then rated individually and compared to the users’ subjective opinion whether a presented game has strong pay-to-win elements, differentiating between players that actively play a respective game and those who do not.
We then analyze two popular games, regarding their expected costs, to stay in a highly competitive environment. Due to the virtual power gained by investing money into those games, players can feel obliged to invest to stay competitive and increase their chances of winning. Our results indicate that selected aspects are clear indicators to predict whether a game is perceived as being pay-to-win. Additionally, our main conclusion shows the threat of new players having to invest heavily in a loot box system already compared to gambling in multiple countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
References
Drummond, A., Sauer, J.D.: Video game loot boxes are psychologically akin to gambling. Nature Hum. Behav. 2(8), 530–532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0360-1
Ferris, J.A., Wynne, H.J.: The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse Ottawa, ON, Canada (2001)
Griffiths, M.D.: Is the buying of loot boxes in video games a form of gambling or gaming? Gaming Law Rev. 22(1), 52–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2018.2216
Hamari, J., Sjöblom, M.: What is eSports and why do people watch it? Internet Res. 27(2), 211–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-04-2016-0085
King, D.L., Delfabbro, P.H.: Video game monetization (eg,‘loot boxes’): a blueprint for practical social responsibility measures. Int. J. Mental. Health Addict. 17(1), 166–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0009-3
Macey, J., Hamari, J.: ESports, skins and loot boxes: participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. New Media Soc. 21(1), 20–41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818786216
Moshirnia, A.V.: Precious and worthless: a comparative perspective on loot boxes and gambling. Minnesota J. Law Sci. Technol. 20(1), 77–114 (2018)
Tomić, N.Z.: Economic model of microtransactions in video games. J. Econ. Sci. Res. 1(01), (2018). https://doi.org/10.30564/jesr.v1i1.439
Zendle, D., Cairns, P., Barnett, H., McCall, C.: Paying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-win. Comput. Hum. Behav. 102, 181–191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.003
Zendle, D., Meyer, R., Cairns, P., Waters, S., Ballou, N.: The prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop games. In: Addiction, Wiley Online Library (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14973
Akerman, N.: Is it too expensive to be good at fifa? (2019). https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2836528-is-it-too-expensive-to-be-good-at-fifa. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
McAloon, A.: Online games will be required to disclose random loot box odds in China (2016). Gamasutra.com. https://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/287258/Online_games_will_be_required_to_disclose_random_loot_box_odds_in_China. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Taylor, H.: Belgian Gaming Commission recommends criminal prosecution over illegal loot boxes (2018). GamesIndustry.biz. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2018-05-10-belgian-gambling-commission-lays-out-recommendations-over-illegal-loot-boxes. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Williams, M.: Star Wars: Battlefront 2 Fans Angry At Hero Unlock System And EA’s Response (2017). usgamer.net. https://www.usgamer.net/articles/star-wars-battlefront-2-fans-angry-at-hero-unlock-system-and-eas-response. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Convars CS:GO Case Simulator Homepage. https://convars.com/case. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
FIFA Analytics Homepage. https://fifa-analytics.com. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
FUTBIN Homepage. https://www.futbin.com. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Hearthstone Gamepedia. https://hearthstone.gamepedia.com/. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
HSReplay Homepage. https://hsreplay.net. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Packr: a Hearthstone mass pack opening simulator Homepage. https://speedodevo.github.io/packr/. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Steam-Community Market. https://steamcommunity.com/market/. Accessed 2 Jun 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tregel, T., Schwab, M.C., Nguyen, T.T.L., Müller, P.N., Göbel, S. (2020). Costs to Compete - Analyzing Pay to Win Aspects in Current Games. In: Ma, M., Fletcher, B., Göbel, S., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Marsh, T. (eds) Serious Games. JCSG 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12434. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61814-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61814-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61813-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61814-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)