Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Violence-related behaviors among adolescents and its association with cognitive emotion regulation strategies

  • Original article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Adolescent violence is now regarded as a major public health concern. Despite growing interest in psychographic risk factors for violent behavior, few studies have explored the role of strategies to regulate cognitive emotion in adolescents. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of adolescent violence behaviors and to identify the relationship between specific strategies to regulate cognitive emotion and forms of violent behavior.Adolescent violence is now regarded as a major public health concern. Despite growing interest in psychographic risk factors for violent behavior, few studies have explored the role of strategies to regulate cognitive emotion in adolescents. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of adolescent violence behaviors and to identify the relationship between specific strategies to regulate cognitive emotion and forms of violent behavior.

Methods

We cross-sectionally surveyed 3315 students in grades 7 to 10 using anonymous, self-reporting questionnaires to examine strategies to regulate cognitive emotion and violence-related behaviors in young adolescents. A logistic regression model was used to identify the relationship between specific violent behaviors and strategies to regulate cognitive emotion.

Results

The most commonly reported type of violent behavior was verbal attack (48.6%), while 7.1% of students were involved in fights and 2.4% had been injured in fights. Boys were involved in all forms of violent behavior studied, and did so significantly more often than girls (P<0.05). Logistic regression revealed that six cognitive emotion strategies (self-blame, rumination, planning, reappraisal, catastrophisizing, and blaming others) were associated with violent behaviors, of which catastrophisizing was the most significant factor of all violent behaviors examined that were influenced by this strategy.

Conclusions

Violence-related behaviors, especially verbal attacks, were common among adolescents. Several cognitive emotion regulation strategies were positively associated with specific violent behaviors, but catastrophisizing was strongly related to all forms of violent behavior. Thus, programs targeting adolescent violence must address this and other maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Violence: a public health priority. Geneva: WHO Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Swahn MH, Donovan JE. Correlates and predictors of violent behavior among adolescent drinkers. J Adolesc Health 2004;34:480–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell-Sills L, Barlow DH. Incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders. In: Gross JJ, eds. Handbook of emotion regulation, Guilford: Guilford Pub, 2007: 542–559.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: a comparative study of five specific samples. Pers Individ Dif 2006;40:1659–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mennin DS, Holaway RM, Fresco DM, Moore MT, Heimberg RG. Delineating components of emotion and its dysregulation in anxiety and mood psychopathology. Behav Ther 2007;38:284–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Stice E, Wade E, Bohon C. Reciprocal relations between rumination and bulimic, substance abuse, and depressive symptoms in female adolescents. J Abnorm Psychol 2007;116:198–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fabes RA, Eisenberg N, Jones S, Smith M, Guthrie I, Poulin R, et al. Regulation, emotionality, and preschoolers’ socially competent peer interactions. Child Dev 1999;70:432–442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Auerbach RP, Abela JR, Zhu X, Yao S. A diathesis-stress model of engagement in risky behaviors in Chinese adolescents. Behav Res Ther 2007;45:2850–2860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problem. Pers Individ Dif 2001;30:1311–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu XZ, Luo FS, Yao SQ, Randy PA, Abela JRZ. Reliability and validity of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire chinese version. Chin J Clin Psychol 2007;15:121–131. [In Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li ZY. Practice of the chinese version on the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ). Chin J Health Psychol 2008;16:456–458. [In Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brener ND, Simon TR, Krug EG, Lowry R. Recent trends in violence-related behaviors among high school students in the United States. JAMA 1999;282:440–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pickett W, Craig W, Harel Y, Cunningham J, Simpson K, Molcho M, et al. Cross-national study of fighting and weapon carrying as determinants of adolescent injury. Pediatrics 2005;116:e855-e863.

  14. Smith-Khuri E, Iachan R, Scheidt PC, Overpeck MD, Gabhainn SN, Pickett W, et al. A cross-national study of violencerelated behaviors in adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:539–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Ross J, Hawkins J, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 2010;59:1–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang X, Huang Z, Xiao B, Mai Z, Bu K, Zhang S. Adolescent health risk behavior in Foshan City: I intentional and unintentional injury behavior. Chin J School Doctor 2008;22:123–126. [In Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas DE, Bierman KL, Thompson C, Powers CJ, Conduct Problems Prevention Research G. Double jeopardy: child and school characteristics that predict aggressive-disruptive behavior in first grade. School Psych Rev 2008;37:516–532.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee LK, Chen PC, Lee KK, Kaur J. Violence-related behaviours among malaysian adolescents: a cross sectional survey among secondary school students in Negeri Sembilan. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:169–174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu C, Wang J, Zhou Z, Li F. A survey on risk behaviors related to injury of primary and secondary school students in Guangzhou city. Chin J Gen Pract 2009;7:1098–1100. [In Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao J, Huang R, Yu L, Liu Z, Zhu X, Yao S. Gender differences of the cognitive emotion regulation strategies in senior high school students. Chin Ment Health J 2009;23:670–673. [In Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhan J. Charting the developmental trajectories of visual attention and executive fuction of normal pupils and adolescents. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo F, Wang X, Zhang S, Shen D. Characteristics of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in adolescents. Chin J Clin Psychol 2010;18:93–96. [In Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Manual for the use of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ): a questionnaire measuring cognitive coping strategies. Leiderdorp: DATEC, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lyubomirsky S, Tkach C. The consequences of dysphoric rumination. In: Papageorgiou C, Wells A, eds. Depressive rumination: nature, theory, and treatment. Chichester: Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003: 21–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilliom M, Shaw DS, Beck JE, Schonberg MA, Lukon JL. Anger regulation in disadvantaged preschool boys: strategies, antecedents, and the development of self-control. Dev Psychol 2002;38:222–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Peng Bao, Jin Jing, Wen-Han Yang & Xiu-Hong Li

  2. Nan Sha Middle School, Guangzhou, 511458, China

    Yu-Sui Cai

Authors
  1. Peng Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen-Han Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiu-Hong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu-Sui Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Jing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, P., Jing, J., Yang, WH. et al. Violence-related behaviors among adolescents and its association with cognitive emotion regulation strategies. World J Pediatr 12, 82–87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-015-0014-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-015-0014-6

Key words

Search

Navigation