Abstract
Background
Nose and mouth leaks impair effective pressure transmission during neonatal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but little is known about how these leaks affect physiological parameters. This study investigated the influence of nose leaks and spontaneous mouth opening on peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR) using nasopharyngeal CPAP.
Methods
In 32 neonates with a gestational age of 30 (24–38) weeks and a birth weight of 1435 (710–2730) g, SpO2 and RR measurements were taken with and without occlusion of the contralateral nostril in a randomized cross-over trial in 1-minute intervals over a 10-minute period during each condition. Mouth opening and newborn activity were documented.
Results
SpO2 with open nostril was comparable to that with occluded nostril [93 (78.5–99.5)% vs. 94 (80–100)%, P=0.20]. RR decreased from 51 (26–82)/min to 48 (32–85)/min (P=0.027). In infants with an SpO2≤93% during open nostril (n=17), SpO2 increased after nostril occlusion [91 (80–96)% vs. 89.5 (78.5–93)%, P=0.036]. The mouth was open in 78.5% of measurements with open nostril, and in 87.4% of measurements after nostril occlusion (P=0.005). No significant influence of mouth opening or closure on SpO2 or RR was detected.
Conclusions
In neonates on unilateral nasopharyngeal CPAP with an SpO2 ≤93%, occlusion of the contralateral nostril significantly increased SpO2 and reduced RR. The beneficial physiological effects further support using binasal prongs to minimize nose leaks in this population. Future studies should investigate the beneficial effects of reducing mouth leaks when applying CPAP to these infants.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diblasi RM. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the respiratory care of the newborn infant. Respir Care 2009;54:1209–1235.
Mahmoud RA, Roehr CC, Schmalisch G. Current methods of non-invasive ventilatory support for neonates. Paediatr Respir Rev 2011;12:196–205.
Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2:CD000143.
Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008;358:700–708.
Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, Rich W, Gantz MG, Laptook AR, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1970–1979.
Göpel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A, Laux R, Hoehn T, Wieg C, et al. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:1627–1634.
Black C. CPAP, yes! But how? Respir Care 2010;55:638–639.
Roehr CC, Schmalisch G, Khakban A, Proquitté H, Wauer RR. Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in neonatal units—a survey of current preferences and practice in Germany. Eur J Med Res 2007;12:139–144.
De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, Morley CJ. Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;1:CD002977.
De Paoli AG, Morley CJ, Davis PG, Lau R, Hingeley E. In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002;87:F42–F45.
Chilton HW, Brooks JG. Pharyngeal pressures in nasal CPAP. J Pediatr 1979;94:808–810.
De Paoli AG, Lau R, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Pharyngeal pressure in preterm infants receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F79–F81.
Pedersen JE, Nielsen K. Oropharyngeal and esophageal pressure during mono- and binasal CPAP in neonates. Acta Paediatr 1994;83:143–149.
Fischer HS, Roehr CC, Proquitté H, Hammer H, Wauer RR, Schmalisch G. Is volume and leak monitoring feasible during nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates? Intensive Care Med 2009;35:1934–1941.
Karam O, Donatiello C, Van Lancker E, Chritin V, Pfister RE, Rimensberger PC. Noise levels during nCPAP are flowdependent but not device-dependent. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F132–F134.
Richards GN, Cistulli PA, Ungar RG, Berthon-Jones M, Sullivan CE. Mouth leak with nasal continuous positive airway pressure increases nasal airway resistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:182–186.
Richardson CP, Jung AL. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on pulmonary function and blood gases of infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Res 1978;12:771–774.
Shiao SY, Ou CN. Validation of oxygen saturation monitoring in neonates. Am J Crit Care 2007;16:168–178.
Sherman TI, Blackson T, Touch SM, Greenspan JS, Shaffer TH. Physiologic effects of CPAP: application and monitoring. Neonatal Netw 2003;22:7–16.
Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, Simpson JM. Oxygensaturation targets and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2003;349:959–967.
York JR, Landers S, Kirby RS, Arbogast PG, Penn JS. Arterial oxygen fluctuation and retinopathy of prematurity in very-lowbirth-weight infants. J Perinatol 2004;24:82–87.
Bachour A, Hurmerinta K, Maasilta P. Mouth closing device (chinstrap) reduces mouth leak during nasal CPAP. Sleep Med 2004;5:261–267.
Rabec CA, Reybet-Degat O, Bonniaud P, Fanton A, Camus P. Leak monitoring in noninvasive ventilation. Arch Bronconeumol 2004;40:508–517.
Krouskop RW, Brown EG, Sweet AY. The early use of continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 1975;87:263–267.
Schmalisch G, Fischer H, Roehr CC, Proquitté H. Comparison of different techniques to measure air leaks during CPAP treatment in neonates. Med Eng Phys 2009;31:124–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, H.S., Roehr, C.C., Proquitté, H. et al. Influence of nose and mouth leaks on peripheral oxygen saturation during continuous positive airway pressure in neonates. World J Pediatr 9, 318–322 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-013-0435-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-013-0435-z