Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the factors affecting the ultimate bearing capacity of bridge piles in limestone with a calibrated 3D FEM

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the behavior of a pile constructed on limestone rock under axial loading using a numerical approach. A parametric study was performed based on the full-scale pile load test results and the geotechnical reports on the site. Different values of unconfined compressive strength were implemented to investigate the pile’s behavior in relation to skin friction resistance only and the combination of end bearing and skin friction resistance. Additionally, we studied the effects of the length/diameter ratio on the pile’s capacity using nine pile load models. Numerical analysis showed that, in the initial loading stage, the applied load was transferred by skin friction only, until a certain displacement value, after which end bearing resistance shared the transferred load with skin friction resistance. Furthermore, there was a strong correlation between the load values measured using the finite element method and the values predicted from other methods used in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd Elaziz AY, El Naggar MH (2014a) Group behaviour of hollow-bar micropiles in cohesive soils. Can Geotechnical J 51:1139–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd Elaziz AY, El Naggar MH (2014b) Geotechnical capacity of hollow-bar micropiles in cohesive soils. Can Geotechnical J 51:1123–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACES (2019) Geotechnical site investigation report for intersection bridge, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh

  • Alnuaim A, El Naggar H, El Naggar MH (2013) Performance of piled-raft system under axial load. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, pp 2663–2666

    Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim A, Hamid W, Alshenawy A (2019) Unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus of Riyadh limestone. Electron J Geotechn Eng 24:707–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim AM, El Naggar H, El Naggar MH (2017) Evaluation of piled raft performance using a verified 3D nonlinear numerical model. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1831–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0212-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim AM, El Naggar MH (2014) Performance of foundations in sabkha soil: numerical investigation. Geotech Geol Eng 32:637–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9739-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim AM, El Naggar MH, El Naggar H (2016) Numerical investigation of the performance of micropiled rafts in sand. Comput Geotech 77:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim AM, El Naggar MH, El Naggar H (2018) Performance of micropiled rafts in clay: numerical investigation. Computers and Geotechnics 99:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim AM, Hamid WM, Alshenawy AO (2020) Numerical study of skin friction behavior of piles in limestone rock. Soil Mechanics Foundation Eng 57:265–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-020-09664-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Refeai T, Al-Ghamdy D (1994) Geological and geotechnical aspects of Saudi Arabia. Geotech Geol Eng 12:253–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshenawy AO, Hamid WM, Alnuaim AM (2019) Experimental investigation of skin friction response of RC piles in hard limestone rocks. Arabian J Geosci 12:517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4674-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomquist D, Townsend FC (1991) Development of in situ equipment for capacity determinations of deep foundations in Florida limestone. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkgreve RBJ, Kumarswamy S, Swolfs WM (2018) User’s Manual for Plaxis 3D 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • CGS (1985) Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, second edi. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung JH, Ko J, Klammler H et al (2012) A numerical and experimental study of bearing stiffness of drilled shafts socketed in heterogeneous rock. Comput Struct 90:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy P, Randolph MF (1993) An approximate analysis procedure for piled raft foundations. Int J Numerical Analytical Methods Geomech 17:849–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt E (2012) The Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Rock Mechanics Rock Eng 45:981–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0276-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2010) Drilled shafts: construction procedures and LRFD design methods. McLean

  • Hamid WM (2018) Behaviour of embedded pile in limestone rock in Riyadh: experimental and numerical studies. King Saud University, Riyadh

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan KM, O’Neill MW, Sheikh SA, Ealy CD (1997) Design method for drilled shafts in soft argillaceous rock. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mechan Mining Sci 34:1165–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath RG, Kenney TC (1979) Shaft resistance of rock-socketed drilled piers. In: Symposium on deep foundations. ASCE, pp 182–214

  • Horvath RG, Kenney TC, Kozicki P (1983) Methods for improving the performance of drilled piers in weak rock. Can Geotech J 20:758–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 14593 (1998) Design and construction of bored cast-in-situ piles founded on rocks-guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Goodman RE (1980) Design of foundations on discontinuous rock, Proceedings of the international conference on structural foundations on rock, Sydney, pp 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Phoon KK (1993) Drilled shaft side resistance in clay soil to rock. In: Design and performance of deep foundation. Piles and Piers in Soil and Soft Rock. ASCE, pp 172–183

  • Lee J, You K, Jeong S, Kim J (2013) Proposed point bearing load transfer function in jointed rock-socketed drilled shafts. Soils Foundations 53:596–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVay MC, Townsend FC, Williams RC (1992) Design of socketed drilled shafts in limestone. J Geotech Eng 118:1626–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meigh AC, Wolski W (1979) Design parameters for weak rocks. In: 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp 59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese LC, O’Neill MW (1988) Drilled shafts: construction procedures and design methods. Prepared for US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Implementation

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg P, Journeaux NL (1977) Friction and end bearing tests on bedrock for high capacity socket design. Can Geotech J 14:272–272. https://doi.org/10.1139/t77-029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK, Armitage HH (1987) Design method for drilled piers in soft rock. Can Geotech J 24:126–142. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q (1995) Load transfer mechanisms of drilled shaft foundations in karstic limestone- behavior under working load. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

    Google Scholar 

  • Theinat AK (2015) 3D numerical modelling of micropiles interaction with soil & rock. Missouri University of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter DJ, Burwash WJ, Montgomery RA (1997) Design of large-diameter drilled shafts for the Northumberland Strait bridge project. Can Geotech J 34:580–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AF, Pells PJN (1981) Side resistance rock sockets in sandstone, mudstone, and shale. Can Geotech J 18:502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu M, Ni P, Ding X, Mei G (2019) Physical and numerical modelling of axially loaded bored piles with debris at the pile tip. Comput Geotech 114:103146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (1998) End bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, M.ASCE PE, Xu J (2009) Axial load transfer behavior of rock-socketed shafts. In: Contemporary Topics in Deep Foundations-2009 International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo, pp 175–182

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2020/285), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

The Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2020/285), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wagdi M. Hamid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Abdullah M. Al-Amri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alnuaim, A.M., Hamid, W.M. & Alshenawy, A.O. Investigation of the factors affecting the ultimate bearing capacity of bridge piles in limestone with a calibrated 3D FEM. Arab J Geosci 14, 372 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06710-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06710-6

Keywords

Navigation