Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Construction of knowledge-based spatial decision support system for landslide mapping using fuzzy clustering and KPSO analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A spatial decision support system, incorporating a geographic information system and a data interpreter based on Data Mining, is developed to analyze the landslide distributions and locations. Satellite remote sensing (RS) can offer an advancing scientific-based knowledge of the landslide problem that, directly and instantly adopt to present the disaster area. However, integrating the RS data into a decision system seems quite difficult. Therefore, this study is decided to develop unsupervised clustering techniques with an improved translation platform to extract some image knowledge on landslide occurrence. More specifically, this study used spatial information technology to attain the vegetation cover and landforms. Conditioning factors are also adopted to attain the further vegetation information. Then, two parallel spatial decision support systems are generated: (a) fuzzy c-means (FCM) is used to analyze the feature of their attributes; (b) the KPSO (k-means + Particle Swam Optimization) is used to approach a parallel study of FCM. Various levels of m values (different fuzzy degrees) are presented with regards to the accuracy of the image classification. While m = 2 the accuracy is 81 % which is lower than m = 3.6 the accuracy is 86 %. Similar results are obtained through KPSO and verifications are made. Finally, the EKTP (Expert Knowledge Translation Platform) is applied to enhance the performance of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Salt and pepper effect: In some cases, some single pixels are set alternatively to zero or to the maximum value, giving the image a “salt and pepper”-like appearance.

References

  • Abdalla EME, Zeinelabdein KAE, Khidir SOHEI, Gachet A (2011) The application of remote sensing and structural analysis in groundwater exploration in basement terrains, Darfur region. Western Sudan. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0468-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A, Turk N (2010) Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ Earth Sci 61(3):595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. B Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J, Ehrlich R, Full W (1984) FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput Geosci 10(2–3):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2003) Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:1125–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang K, Wan S, Lei T (2010) Development of a spatial decision support system for monitoring earthquake-induced landslides based on aerial photographs and the finite element method. J Appl Earth Obs GeoInfo 12(6):448–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-Y. and Ye, F., K-means algorithm based on particle swarm optimization, 2003, Int Conf Inform, Cyb, Sys, I-Shou University, Taiwan, R.O.C. pp. 1470–1475.

  • Chou WC, Lin WT, Lin CY (2009) Vegetation recovery patterns assessment at landslides caused by catastrophic earthquake: a case study in central Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess 152(1–4):245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden D.M., Varnes D.J., 1996, Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides investigation and mitigation, Special Report 247, pp 36–75

  • Dai FC, Lee FC (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati L, Turrini MC (2002) An objective method to rank the importance of the factors predisposing to landslides with the GIS methodology: application to an area of the Apennines (Valnerina; Perugia, Italy). Eng Geol 63:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008a) Commentary guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008b) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goktepe A, Altun S, Sezer A (2005) Soil clustering by fuzzy c-means algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 36(10):691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habi M, Morsli B (2011) Impact of water and soil conservation (WSC) strategies in improving water balance and soil production in Algeria: options to alleviate the negative impacts of climate change. Arab J Geosci 1–8. doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0412-6

  • Iverson RM (2000) Landslide triggering by rain infiltration. Water Resour Res 36(7):1897–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S (2004) Cluster center initialization algorithm for K-means clustering. Pattern Recogn Lett 25(11):1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazai B, Sitar N (2003) Evaluation of factors controlling earthquake-induced landslides caused by Chi-Chi earthquake and comparison with the Northridge and Loma Prieta events. Eng Geol 71:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam D, Leon L, Hamilton S, Crookshank N, Bonin D, Swayne D (2004) Multi-model integration in a decision support system: a technical user interface approach for watershed and lake management scenarios. Environ Model Softw 19(3):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50(6):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Min K, Won JS (2003) Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:1361–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei TC, Wan S, Chou TY (2007) The comparison of PCA and discrete rough set method for feature extraction of remote sensing image classification – a case study on rice classification, Taiwan. Compt Rendus Geosci 12(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin WT (2008) Earthquake-induced landslide hazard monitoring and assessment using SOM and PROMETHEE techniques: a case study at the Chiufenershan area in Central Taiwan. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22:9,995–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj R (1993) Landslide processes and landslide susceptibility analysis from an upland watershed: a case study from St. Andrew, Jamaica, West Indies. Eng Geol 34:53–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdizadeh E, Sadi-Nezhad S, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2008) Optimization of fuzzy clustering criteria by a hybrid PSO and fuzzy c-means. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 5(3):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchiorre C (2008) Artificial neural networks and cluster analysis in landslide susceptibility zonation. Geomorphology 94(3–4):379–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noferini L, Pieraccini M, Mecatti D, Macaluso G, Luzi G, Atzeni C (2006) Long term landslide monitoring by ground-based synthetic aperture radar interferometer. INT J remote Sens 27(10):1893–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh JJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 37(9):1264–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA. Eng Geol 69(3–4):331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2011) Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):329–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2013) A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci 51:350–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Buchroithner MF (2010) Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosc 16(2):107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM (2010) Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arab J Geosci 3(3):319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010a) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide prone area (Cameron Highland, Malaysia). IEEE T Geosci Remote 48(12):4164–4177. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2050328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, B, Sezer, E, Gokceoglu, C, Buchroithner, MF, (2010), Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide prone area (Cameron Highland, Malaysia). IEEE T Geosci Remote, 48, issue. 12, pp. 4164–4177 doi:10.1109/TGRS.2010.2050328

  • Rupke J, Cammeraat E, Seijmonsbergen AC, Van Westen CJ (1988) Engineering geomorphology of the Widentobel catchment, Switzerland: a geomorphological inventory system applied to geotechnical appraisal of the slope stability. Eng Geol 26:33–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safari M, Kakaei R, Ataei M, Karamoozian M (2012) Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for mineral processing plant site selection Case study: Sangan iron ore mine (phase 2). Arab J Geosci 5(5):1011–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santacana N, De Paz A, Baeza B, Corominas J, Marturi J (2003) A GIS based multivariate statistical analysis for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping in La Pobla de Lillet area (Eastern Pyrenees, Spain). Nat Hazards 30(3):281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selim SZ, Ismail MA (1984) K-means type algorithms: a generalized convergence theorem and characterization of local optimality. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart RN, Purucker TS (2011) An environmental decision support system for spatial assessment and selective remediation. Environ Model Softw. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71:303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangestani MH (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using the fuzzy gamma approach in a GIS, Kakan catchment area, southwest Iran. Aust J Earth Sci 51(3):439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Special Report 176: Landslides: analysis and control. Transportation and Road Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington DC, pp 11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan S (2009) A spatial decision support system for extracting the core factors and thresholds for landslide susceptibility map. Eng Geol 108:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Huang PC, Chou TY (2008) Knowledge rules of debris flow event: a case study for investigation Chen Yu Lan River, Taiwan. Eng Geol 98:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Chou TY (2009) A novel data mining technique of analysis and classification for landslide problems. NAT HAZARDS 52:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC, Chou TY (2009) An enhanced supervised spatial decision support system of image classification: consideration on the ancillary information of paddy rice area. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(4):623–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S., Lei T.C. and Chou T.Y., (2012), A landslide expert system: image classification through integration of data mining approaches for multi-category analysis, Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 1–24. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.613397

  • Ye F, Chen CY (2005) Alternative KPSO-clustering algorithm. Tamkang J Sci Eng 8(2):165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61:821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the National Science Council (Project No. 101-2221-E-275-005), which sponsored this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiuan Wan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wan, S., Yen, J.Y., Lin, C.Y. et al. Construction of knowledge-based spatial decision support system for landslide mapping using fuzzy clustering and KPSO analysis. Arab J Geosci 8, 1041–1055 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1226-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1226-5

Keywords

Navigation