Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of hydrophilic cotton processing wastewater treatment methods and giving the optimum method for it

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the methods of wastewater treatment of hydrophilic cotton producing industries. Several major cotton producing countries, such as India, have provided very stringent environmental standards for these industries, and it is expected that these standards are becoming more stringent day by day. This is necessary for monitoring and control facilities, in order to minimize problems and difficulties associated with treated wastewater disposal. Unit processes of these industries are: pretreatment, dyeing, printing and other complementary processes. In this industry, aside from considerable amounts of energy and water consumption, considerable quantity of wastewater is also produced. This article discusses all types of waste producing hydrophilic cotton processes; we have also advanced wastewater treatment methods, such as electrical oxidation, membrane processes, biological and photochemical treatments. Results showed that traditional methods of wastewater treatment are compound methods including physical–chemical and biological methods, and requires substantial investment and operational costs. Compared to traditional methods, membrane systems are very effective methods and are a good substitute. Investigation showed that hybrid treatment methods that include absorption and absorption by nano-filtration can play an effective role in improving treated wastewater quality. Moreover, advanced treatments such as ion exchange systems can improve wastewater quality to the extent that it can be recycled to the production processes for second usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY, Savenije HHG, Gautam R (2005) The water footprint of cotton consumption. Unesco_ihe. Institute for water education. Value of water. Research report series no.18, pp 19–22

  • Gerik TJ, Landiver JA, Faver KL (1995) The physiology of cotton water use efficiency. In: Constable GA, Forrester NW (eds) Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference on Challenging the Future 1, Brisbane, Australia, February 14–17, 1994. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 66–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerson RC, Krieg DR, Haring CL, Chang N (1977) Effects of plant water status on stomatal activity, photosynthesis, and nitrate reductase activity of field grown cotton. Crop Sci 17:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y et al (1999) A new method for improving the dyeability of cotton with reactive dyes. Textile Res J 69(6):440–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean Ethridge M (1998) 57th Plenary Meeting of International Cotton Advisory Committee, Santa Cruz, Bolivia, Oct. 12–16

  • Booker FL (2000) Influence of carbon dioxide enrichment, ozone and nitrogen fertilization on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf and root composition. Plant Cell Environ 23:573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GP, Stewart WS (1970) Photochemical oxidants: effect on starch hydrolysis in leaves. Science 168:1223–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MJ, Heath RL (1981) Ozone sensitivity in sweet corn (Zea mays L.) plants: a possible relationship to water balance. Plant Physiol 68:885–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen L, Engvild KC (1995) Effects of ozone on 14 C translocation velocity and growth of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exposed in open-top chambers. Environ Pollut 87:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenländer T (2003) Photochemical purification of water and air, advanced oxidation processes: Principles, reaction mechanisms, reactor concepts. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackowski T, Chylewska B, Cyniak D (2002) Influence of spinning process parameters on strength characteristics of cotton yarns. Fibres Textiles Eastern Eur 10(N03):27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfhorst B (1984) The technological and economic aspects of the recycling of wastes in modern cotton mills. Foreign-edition with English supplement, vol. 8. Textile Praxis International, pp 741–713

  • Schlichter S, Kuschel A (1995) Recent findings on the cleanability of cotton. Melliand Textilberichte 76:49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfhorst B (1984) The technological and economic aspects of the recycling of wastes in modern cotton mills. Foreign edition with English supplement, vol. 8. Textile Praxis International, pp 741–743

  • Allain E, Besson S, Durand C, Moreau M, Gacoin T, Boilot JP (2007) Adv Funct Mater 17:549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Zhang X, Murakami T, Fujishima A (2008) Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 92:1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoubi H, Taghavinia N, Alamdari EK (2010) Surf Coat Technol 204:1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellott NP, Durucan C, Pantano CG, Guglielmi M (2006) Thin Solid Films 502:112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Khezri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghafari, B., Khezri, S.M. Evaluation of hydrophilic cotton processing wastewater treatment methods and giving the optimum method for it. Arab J Geosci 6, 2991–2995 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0554-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0554-1

Keywords

Navigation