Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for evaluating operations control on a metro line: integrating multiple perspectives and automatically collected train and passenger movement data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transit operations control, the task of implementing the operations plan in daily operations on a metro line, plays a key role in service delivery because it determines the quality of the service experienced by passengers. Yet, it is one of the most poorly understood aspects of rail transit operations. Faced with a disruption or infeasibility, dispatchers typically choose between several response strategies. However, to date, it has been very difficult to evaluate the positive and negative effects of individual control strategies with respect to operations and passenger travel times under real-world conditions. This paper proposes a framework for the study of rail operations control decisions that integrates automatically collected service and passenger demand data, which are increasingly available and accessible to transit agencies. The framework supports a multiperspective analysis methodology that can inform operational policies and plans, and help operations control decision-makers choose the most appropriate strategies to manage service. By using automatically collected data, taking into consideration the operations control decision environment, and acknowledging that the reliability of the resulting service depends on many factors endogenous to it, this paper takes a distinctly different approach from previous studies, which have relied heavily on modeling, assumed simple operating contexts, and did not consider the full range of available data. Two real-world applications of the framework, where control decisions are evaluated in terms of their operational and passenger impacts, are presented. The methodology is found to be versatile and valuable in providing insights that could not have been gained otherwise. Although the framework is applied to the London Underground, its logic, structure, and procedures are applicable and transferable to other metro systems recognizing that certain specifics would need to be tailored to the available data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abkowitz M (1986) Optimal control of headway variation on transit routes. J Adv Transp 20:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamski A, Turnau A (1998) Simulation support tool for real-time dispatching control in public transport. Transp Res, Part A, Policy Pract 32(6):73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrel A (2009) Diagnosis and assessment of operations control interventions: Framework and applications to a high frequency metro line. MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Carrel A, Mishalani R, Wilson N, Attanucci J, Rahbee A (2010) Decision factors in service control on a high-frequency metro line and their importance in service delivery. Transp Res Rec 2146:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan J (2007) Rail OD estimation and journey time reliability metrics using automated fare data. MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Daganzo CF (2009) A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 43(10):913–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daganzo CF, Pilachowski J (2011) Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 45(1):913–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon M (2006) Analysis of a subway operations control database: The MBTA operations control system. MS Thesis, Northeastern University, Boston

  • Eberlein X (1995) Real-time control strategies in transit operations: models and analysis. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Eberlein XJ, Wilson NHM, Bernstein D (2001) The holding problem with real-time information available. Transp Sci 35(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froloff E, Rizzi M, Saporito A (1989) Bases et pratiques de la régulation. RATP, Direction du Réseau Routier RC/MSE

  • Furth P, Muller T (2006) Service reliability and hidden waiting time: insights from automatic vehicle location data. Transp Res Rec 1955:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y, Mishalani RG, McCord MR (2009) Assignment-based methodology to match automated vehicle location transit bus trip trajectories to schedules. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on conference on advanced systems for public transport, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y, Mishalani RG, McCord MR (2010) Analytical and empirical investigations of the effect of bus drivers’ reactions to schedules on transit operations reliability. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on transportation research, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin JG, Kwong MT, Sun L (2013) Disruption response planning for an urban mass rapid transit network. Presented at the transportation research board 92nd annual meeting, Washington DC

  • Kepaptsoglou K, Karlaftis MG (2009) The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms. Public Transp 1(4):275–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffman D (1978) A simulation study of alternative real-time bus headway control strategies. Transp Res Rec 663:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell S (1997) Optimal control strategies for a rail transit line. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Osuna E, Newell G (1972) Control strategies for an idealized public transportation system. Transp Sci 6:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puong A (2001) A real-time train holding model for rail transit systems. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Rahbee A (2001) Rail transit operations analysis: Framework and applications. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Shen S (2000) Integrated real-time disruption recovery strategies: A model for rail transit systems. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Uniman D (2009) Service reliability measurement using AFC smart card data—A framework for the London Underground. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Uniman D, Attanucci J, Mishalani R, Wilson N (2010) Service reliability measurement using automated fare card data: application to London underground. Transp Res Rec 2143:92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker C, Snowdon J, Ryan D (2005) Simultaneous disruption recovery of a train timetable and crew roster in real time. Comput Oper Res 32:2077–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Attanucci J, Wilson N (2011) Bus passenger origin-destination estimation and related analyses. J Public Transp 14(4):131–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wile E (2003) Use of automatically collected data to improve transit line performance. MS thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible by the generous support of Transport for London (TfL). The data and expertise provided by TfL management and technical staff are greatly appreciated. The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions reflected in this paper are the responsibility of the authors only and do not represent the official policy or position of TfL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Carrel.

Additional information

The research presented in this paper was carried out when the corresponding author was a student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrel, A., Mishalani, R.G., Wilson, N.H.M. et al. A framework for evaluating operations control on a metro line: integrating multiple perspectives and automatically collected train and passenger movement data. Public Transp 5, 149–176 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-013-0065-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-013-0065-9

Keywords

Navigation