Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metro networks provide efficient transportation services to large numbers of travelers in urban areas around the World; any unexpected operational disruption can lead to rapid degradation of the provided level of service by a city’s public transportation system. In such instances, quick and efficient substitution of services is necessary for accommodating metro passengers including the widely used practice of “bridging” metro stations using bus services. Despite its widespread application, bus bridging is largely done ad-hoc and not as part of an integrated optimization procedure. In this paper we propose a methodological framework for planning and designing an efficient bus bridging network. Furthermore, we offer a set of structured steps and optimization models and algorithms for handling bus bridging problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baaj MH, Mahmassani HS (1991) An AI-based approach for transit route system planning and design. J Adv Transp 25(2):187–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balog JN, Boyd A, Caton JE (2003) The public transportation system security and emergency preparedness planning guide. Report DOT-VNTSC-FTA-03-01, Washington DC, USA

  • Beasley JE, Chu PC (1996) A genetic algorithm for the set covering problem. Eur J Oper Res 94(3):392–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd A, Maier P, Caton JE (1998) Critical incident management guidelines. Report FTA-MA-26-7009-98-1, Washington DC, USA

  • Ceder A (2003) Designing public transport network and routes. In: Lam WHK, Bell MGH (eds) Advanced modeling for transit operations and service planning. Pergamon/Elsevier, Elmsford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceder A, Wilson NHM (1986) Bus network design. Transp Res B 20B(4):331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakroborty P (2003) Genetic algorithms for optimal urban transit network design. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 18(3):184–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakroborty P, Dwivedi T (2002) Optimal route network design for transit systems using genetic algorithms. Eng Optim 34(1):83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiben AE, Smith JE (2003) Introduction to evolutionary computing. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans AW, Morrison AD (1997) Incorporating accident risk and disruption in economic models of public transport. J Transp Econ Policy 31:117–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan W, Machemehl R (2004) Optimal transit route network design problem: algorithms, implementations, and numerical results. Report SWUTC/04/167244-1, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, TX.

  • Fan W, Machemehl R (2006a) Optimal transit route network design problem with variable transit demand: a genetic algorithm approach. J Transp Eng 132(1):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan W, Machemehl R (2006b) Using a simulated annealing algorithm to solve the transit route network design problem. J Transp Eng 132(2):122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo G, Di Miele F (2001) Dispatching buses in parking depots. Transp Sci 35:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEA Toolbox WWW site, www.geatoolbox.com, accessed April 2004

  • Gen M, Cheng R (1999) Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization. Interscience, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberd DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway WT, Markos SH (1991) Recommended emergency preparedness guidelines for urban, rural and specialized transit systems. Report DOT-VNTSC-UMTA-91-1, Washington DC, USA

  • Heimann DI (1979) Determination of transit system dependability. In: Proceedings of the annual reliability and maintainability symposium, Washington, DC, January 23–25

  • Janarthanan N, Schneider JB (1984) Computer aided design as applied to transit system emergency contingency planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 9(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepaptsoglou K, Karlaftis M (2009) The transit route network design problem: a review. ASCE J Transp Eng 135(8):491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepaptsoglou K (2009) Development of optimization methods for the operation of a fixed route system under emergency conditions. PhD Dissertation submitted to the National Technical University of Athens, Greece

  • Meyer MD, Belobaba P (1982) Contingency planning for response to urban transportation system disruption. J Am Plan Assoc 48(4)

  • Newell GF (1979) Some issues relating to the optimal design of bus routes. Transp Sci 13(1):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrelli M (2004) A transit network design model for urban areas. In: Brebbia CA, Wadhwa LC (eds) Urban Transport X. WIT, Boston, pp 163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston J, Armstrong J, Goodman C, Weston P, Takagi R (2007) Decision support system for dynamic re-scheduling of trains under disturbance. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on transport research, Berkeley, CA

  • Schmocker J-D, Cooper S, Adeney W (2005) Metro service delay recovery: comparison of strategies and constraints across systems, transportation research record 1930. J Transp Res Board, 30–37

  • Scott DM, Novak DC, Aultman-Hall L, Guo F (2006) Network robustness index: a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks. J Transp Geogr 14:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silkunas S (2006) Picking up the tab: compensation for fixed-facility disruption. Transportation research record 1955. J Transp Res Board, 62–68

  • Tom VM, Mohan M (2003) Transit route network design using frequency coded genetic algorithm. J Transp Eng 129(2):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya R, Sugiyama Y, Yamauchi K, Fujinami K, Arisawa R, Nakagawa T (2006) Route-choice support system for passengers in the face of unexpected disturbance of train operations, computers in railways X. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference. WIT, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdes DM, Martínez-Marínez FE, Colucci-Rios B, Bartolomei-Suárez S (2006) Simulation of metro operations under disruptions: application to Tren Urbano in San Juan, Puerto Rico. In: Proceedings of the 85th transportation research board annual meeting, Washington DC, USA

  • Van Nes R, Hamerslag R, Immers BH (1988) Design of public transport networks. Transportation research record 1202. J Transp Res Board, 74–83

  • Van Oudheusden DL, Ranjithan S, Singh KN (1987) The design of bus route systems—an interactive location allocation approach. Transportation 14(3):253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuchic V (2004) Urban transit: operations, planning and economics. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter T, Zimmerman UT (2000) Real-time dispatch of trams in storage yards. Ann Oper Res 96:287–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F, Gan A (2003) Optimization of transit network to minimize transfers. Report BD015-02, Florida International University, FL, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Kepaptsoglou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M.G. The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms. Public Transp 1, 275–297 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-010-0017-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-010-0017-6

Keywords

Navigation