Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of Various Electrode Materials in Electrocoagulation Efficiency: Application in Treatment of Sugar Industry Effluent

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugar industries generate highly polluted effluent in terms of organics and inorganics load and it is very difficult to treat. In the present study, attempts have been made to use electrocoagulation process to treat the effluent. The treatment was carried out using different electrode materials in different combinations. The influence of pH, current density (CD) and treatment time (tR) on COD removal of sugar industry effluent (SIE) was evaluated. Apart from this, electrode loss, species energy consumption and cost analysis were also carried out. For all electrode materials, pH 7 was found to be optimum, and CD in range of 69.44–104.165 A/m2 provided good treatment of the effluent. The performance of Al–MS electrode combination was seen to be the best, as it reduced initial COD of SIE = 4800 mg/dm3 to 920 mg/dm3 (80.83% COD reduction) in 100 min, with treatment cost INR 326 (USD 4.90)/m3 SIE. Kinetics studies showed COD reduction rate to 1.5 order with respect to COD and 0.57 order with respect to CD. The reaction rate constant lies in between 5.0 and 7.1 \( \left( {\frac{{{\text{dm}}^{3} }}{\text{mg}}} \right)^{0.5 } \left( {\frac{{{\text{m}}^{2} }}{\text{A}}} \right)^{0.57} \,\min^{ - 1} \).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhoum, N., and L. Monser. 2004. Decolourization and removal of phenolic compounds from olive mill wastewater by electrocoagulation. Chemical Engineering and Processing 43: 1281–1287.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Can, O.T., M. Bayramoglu, and M. Kobya. 2003. Decolorization of reactive dye solutions by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 42: 3391–3396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Can, O.T., M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, and M. Bayramoglu. 2006. Treatment of the textile wastewater by combined electrocoagulation. Chemosphere 62: 181–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhari, P.K., I.M. Mishra, and S. Chand. 2007. Decolourization and removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) with energy recovery: Treatment of biodigester effluent of a molasses-based alcohol distillery using inorganic coagulants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 296: 238–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guven, G., A. Perendeci, and A. Tanyolac. 2009. Electrochemical treatment of simulated beet sugar factory wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal 151: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katal, R., and H. Pahlavanzadeh. 2011. Influence of different combinations of aluminum and iron electrode on electrocoagulation efficiency: Application to the treatment of paper mill wastewater. Desalination 265: 199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobya, M., O.T. Can, and M. Bayramoglu. 2003. Treatment of textile wastewaters by electrocoagulation using iron and aluminum electrodes. Journal of Hazardous Materials 100: 163–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobya, M., and S. Delipinar. 2008. Treatment of the baker’s yeast wastewater by electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 154: 1133–1140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobya, M., and E. Demirbas. 2015. Evaluations of operating parameters on treatment of can manufacturing wastewater by electrocoagulation. Journal of Water Process Engineering 8: 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., P.V. Nidheesh, and M.S. Kumar. 2018. Composite wastewater treatment by aerated electrocoagulation and modified peroxi-coagulation processes. Chemosphere 205: 587–593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kushwaha, J.P. 2013. A review on sugar industry wastewater: Sources, treatment technologies, and reuse. Desalination and Water Treatment 53: 309–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, S., B. Prasad, I.D. Mall, and I.M. Mishra. 2006. Electrochemical degradation of pulp and paper mill wastewater. Part 2. Characterization and analysis of sludge. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 45: 5766–5774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Migo, V.P., M. Matsumura, E.J.D. Rosario, and H. Kataoka. 1993. Decolorization of molasses wastewater using an inorganic flocculant. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 75 (6): 438–442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, B.S., M. Zaiat, and A. Bonomi. 2015. Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: Challenges and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 44: 888–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nawarkar, C.J., and V.D. Salkar. 2019. Solar powered electrocoagulation system for municipal wastewater treatment. Fuel 237: 222–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati, A.K., and P.K. Chaudhari. 2014. Electrochemical treatment of rice grain-based distillery effluent: Chemical oxygen demand and colour removal. Environmental Technology 35: 242–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prajapati, A.K., and P.K. Chaudhari. 2015. Physicochemical treatment of distillery wastewater—A review. Chemical Engineering Communications 202: 1098–1117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E.W., R.B. Baired, A.D. Eaton, and L.S. Clesceri. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 22nd ed. Troy: Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, O. 2018. Assessment of sugarcane industry: Suitability for production, consumption, and utilization. Annals of Agrarian Science 16: 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, O.P., and P.K. Chaudhari. 2015. Electrochemical treatment of sugar industry wastewater: COD and color removal. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 739: 122–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, O.P., V. Gupta, P.K. Chaudhari, and V.C. Srivastava. 2015. Electrochemical treatment of actual sugar industry wastewater using aluminum electrode. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 12: 3519–3530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivayogimath, C.B., and R. Jahagirdar. 2013. Treatment of sugar industry wastewater using electrocoagulation technique. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology 1: 262–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, A., and O.P. Sahu. 2017. Treatment of food-agro (sugar) industry wastewater with copper metal and salt: Chemical oxidation and electro-oxidation combined study in batch mode. Water Resources and Industry 17: 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • www.indiabrifing.com. Accessed 10 December 2018.

  • www.indiamart.com. Accessed 10 December 2018.

  • www.isosugar.org. Accessed 20 January 2019.

  • Yavuz, Y., and Ü.B. Ögütveren. 2018. Treatment of industrial estate wastewater by the application of electrocoagulation process using iron electrodes. Journal of Environmental Management 207: 151–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to SERB, DST, New Delhi, for providing fund to research under research grant: File No: EEQ/2016/000068.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pramesh Kumar Chaudhari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gondudey, S., Chaudhari, P.K. Influence of Various Electrode Materials in Electrocoagulation Efficiency: Application in Treatment of Sugar Industry Effluent. Sugar Tech 22, 15–27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00753-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00753-6

Keywords

Navigation