Skip to main content
Log in

Screening of Promising Sugarcane Somaclones for Agronomic Traits, and Smut Resistance Using PCR Amplification of Inter Transcribed Region (ITS) of Sporisorium scitaminae

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic improvement of sugarcane variety CoC 671 was carried out through somaclonal variation. The somaclones were obtained by developing callus on 0.8M EMS and 13.57M 2–4.D containing medium. All the 310 regenerated plants were hardened in green house and planted in field for preliminary selection. On the basis of biometric and biochemical parameters 17 somaclones were evaluated in rod row trial and then for smut resistance supplementing with smut inoculum and detection by PCR. The somaclonal variants TC 906 was resistant and TC 922 was moderately resistant to smut. Somaclone TC 922 (2.17 kg, 165 t/ha, 3.34 cm) and TC 906 (2.07 kg, 144.11 t/ha, 3.25 cm) were superior in single cane weight, cane yield and cane diameter over their donor CoC 671 (1.72 kg, 128 t/ha, 2.74 cm). The morphological variations viz. stem colour, internodal alignment, internodal waxiness and leaf width were distinct and stable. The present study reports beneficial traits of the somaclones derived from CoC 671 and their field performance, especially for smut resistance and yield traits and early maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, H.H., and S. Schenck. 1996. PCR amplification form a homolog of bE mating type gene as a sensitive assay for presence of Ustilago scitaminae DNA. Plant Disease 80: 1189–1192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borrás-Hidalgo O., P.H.J. Thomma Bart, E. Carmona, C.J. Borroto, M. Pujol, A. Arencibia, and J. Lopez. 2005. Identification of sugarcane genes induced in disease resistant somaclones upon inoculation with Ustilago scitaminea or Bipolaris sacchari. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 43: 1115–1121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doule, R.B. 2006. Cane yield and quality characters of some promising somaclonal variants of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 8(2&3): 191–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S.M., B.S. Ahloowaliya, and R.E. Veilleux. 1997. Somaclonal variation in crop improvement. In Somaclonal variations and induced mutations in crop improvement, eds. S.M. Jain, D.S. Brar, B.S. Ahloowaliya, 203–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  • Jalaja, N.C., T.V. Sreenivasan, S.M. Pawar, P.G. Bhoi, and R.M. Garker. 2006. Co 94012- a new sugarcane variety through somaclonal variation. Sugar Tech 8(2, 3): 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I.A., M.U. Dahot, N. Seema, S. Yasmin, S. Bibi, S. Raza, and A. Khatri. 2009. Variability in sugarcane plantlets developed through invitro mutagenesis. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41(1): 153–166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, M., and J. Tlaskal. 1974. Fiji disease resistant Saccharum var. Pindar subclones from tissue culture. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technology 15: 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J., and W.R. Scowcroft. 1981. Somaclonal variation: A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 60: 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosawi-Jorf, A.S., and M.B. Izadi. 2007. In vitro detection of yeast like and mycelium colonies of Ustilago scitaminea in tissue cultured plantlets of sugarcane using polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Applied Sciences 7(23): 3768–3773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum 15(3): 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murraya, M.G., and W.F. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acid Research 8: 4321–4325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweny, C., N. Kahiu, H. Nzioki, and S.M. Githiri. 2008. Evaluation of smut inoculation techniques in sugarcane seedlings. Sugar Tech 10(4): 341–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patade, V.Y., P. Suprasanna, and V.A. Bapat. 2006. Selection for abiotic (salinity and Drought) stress tolerance and molecular characterization of tolerant lines in sugarcane. BARC News letter, Issue No. 273, October 2006. (www.barc.ernet.in/publications/nl/2006/200610.pdf).

  • Patade, V.Y., and P. Suprasanna. 2008. Radiation induced in vitro mutagenesis for sugarcane improvement. Sugar Tech 10(1): 14–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Que, Y., L. Xu, J. Lin, M. Ruan, M. Zhang, and R. Chen. 2011. Differential protein expression in sugarcane during sugarcane-sporisorium scitamineum interaction revealed by 2-DE andMALDI-TOF-TOF/MS comparative and functional genomics. Hindawi Publishing Corporation (http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cfg/2011/989016/).

  • Sambrook, J., D.W. Russell, N. Irwin, and K.A. Jansen. 1989. Molecular cloning a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenck, S. 1998. Evaluation of a PCR amplification method for detection of systemic smut infections in sugarcane. Sugarcane 6: 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sing, N., B.M. Somani, and D. Pillay. 2004. Smut disease assessment by PCR and microscopy in inoculated tissue cultured sugarcane cultivars. Plant Science 167: 987–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N., and B.M. Somai. 2005. In vitro screening of sugarcane to evaluate smut susceptibility. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 80(3): 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, T.V., and N.C. Jalaja. 1998. Induced mutations and somaclonal variation in sugarcane in Somaclonal variations and induced mutations in crop improvement, 220–246. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, S.K., M.S. Krishnamurthi, S. Rajeshwari, S. Sekar, and M. Shanmuganathan. 2010. Genetic base broadening of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) by introgression of genes through intergeneric hybridization. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologist 27: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagih, M.E., A. Ala, and Y. Musa. 2004. Regeneration and evaluation of sugarcane somaclonal variants for drought tolerance. Sugar Tech 6(1&2): 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are thankful to Director General, Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Pune for the facilities provided for carrying out the work; Dr. O. P. Sinha, Project Coordinator, All India Coordinated Research Program (Sugarcane) for providing the primers for smut detection and to Dr. K. V. Sushir Scientist, Plant Breeding, VSI for help in scoring morphological variations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. G. Dalvi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalvi, S.G., Vasekar, V.C., Yadav, A. et al. Screening of Promising Sugarcane Somaclones for Agronomic Traits, and Smut Resistance Using PCR Amplification of Inter Transcribed Region (ITS) of Sporisorium scitaminae . Sugar Tech 14, 68–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0132-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0132-y

Keywords

Navigation