Skip to main content
Log in

“Apical thinning”: Relations between myocardial wall thickness and apical left ventricular tracer uptake as assessed with positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

A reduction in left ventricular apical tracer uptake (apical thinning) is frequently observed in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), yet its cause remains a matter of debate, particularly in perfusion emission tomography (PET). This analysis sought to determine whether apical thinning in PET-MPI is attributable to true anatomical thinning of the left ventricular apical myocardium.

Methods and Results

We retrospectively analyzed 57 patients without any history or signs of apical myocardial infarction who underwent rest PET-MPI with 13N-ammonia and contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT). Semi-quantitative normalized percent apical 13N-ammonia uptake at rest, myocardial blood flow (MBF), and k2 wash-out rate constants were compared to apical myocardial wall thickness measurements derived from CT and base-to-apex gradients were calculated. Apical thinning was found in 93% of patients and in 74% when analysis of normalized apical tracer uptake was confined to end-systole. No significant correlation was found between apical myocardial thickness and apical tracer uptake (r = − 0.080, P = .553), MBF (r = − 0.211, P = .115), or k2 wash-out rate (r = − 0.023, P = .872), nor between apical myocardial thickness and any gradients. A statistically significant but small difference in apical myocardial thickness was observed in patients with moderately to severely reduced apical tracer uptake vs patients with normal to mildly reduced uptake (4.3 ± 0.7 mm vs 4.7 ± 0.7 mm; P = .043).

Conclusions

Apical thinning is a highly prevalent finding during 13N-ammonia PET-MPI that is not solely attributable to true anatomical apical wall thickness or the partial volume effect. Other factors that yet need to be identified seem to have a more prominent impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AC:

Attenuation correction

CABG:

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CT:

Computed tomography

ED/ES:

End-diastole/end-systole

MBF:

Myocardial blood flow

MPI:

Myocardial perfusion imaging

PET:

Positron emission tomography

RS:

Rest perfusion score of segment 17

SPECT:

Single photon emission computed tomography

References

  1. Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands RS, Bergmann SR, Delbeke D, Dorbala S, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1187–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dvorak RA, Brown RKJ, Corbett JR. Interpretation of SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion images: Common artifacts and quality control techniques. Radiographics. 2011;31:2041–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apostolopoulos DJ, Savvopoulos C. What is the benefit of CT-based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPET? Hell J Nucl Med. 2016;19:89–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Case JA, Bateman TM. Taking the perfect nuclear image: Quality control, acquisition, and processing techniques for cardiac SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:891–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Purser NJ, Armstrong IS, Williams HA, Tonge CM, Lawson RS. Apical thinning: Real or artefact? Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:382–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ficaro EP, Fessler JA, Shreve PD, Kritzman JN, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1996;93:463–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beanlands RS, Muzik O, Hutchins GD, Wolfe ERJR, Schwaiger M. Heterogeneity of regional nitrogen 13-labeled ammonia tracer distribution in the normal human heart: Comparison with rubidium 82 and copper 62-labeled PTSM. J Nucl Cardiol. 1994;1:225–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fricke H, Fricke E, Weise R, Kammeier A, Lindner O, Burchert W. A method to remove artifacts in attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT Introduced by misalignment between emission scan and CT-derived attenuation maps. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1619–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C, Johnson NP, Guha A, Sdringola S. Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET/CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET images: A definitive analysis of causes, consequences, and corrections. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1112–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajaram M, Tahari AK, Lee AH, Lodge MA, Tsui B, Nekolla S, et al. Cardiac PET/CT misregistration causes significant changes in estimated myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:50–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Slomka PJ, Diaz-Zamudio M, Dey D, Motwani M, Brodov Y, Choi D, et al. Automatic registration of misaligned CT attenuation correction maps in Rb-82 PET/CT improves detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:1285–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takamura T, Horiguchi Y, Kanna M, Matsushita H, Sudo Y, Kikuchi S, et al. Validation of prone myocardial perfusion SPECT with a variable-focus collimator versus supine myocardial perfusion SPECT with or without computed tomography-derived attenuation correction. Ann Nucl Med. 2015;29:890–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomiyama T, Ishihara K, Suda M, Kanaya K, Sakurai M, Takahashi N, et al. Impact of time-of-flight on qualitative and quantitative analyses of myocardial perfusion PET studies using (13)N-ammonia. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:998–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradfield JW, Beck G, Vecht RJ. Left ventricular apical thin point. Heart. 1977;39:806–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook DJ, Bailey I, Strauss HW, Rouleau J, Wagner HNJR, Pitt B. Thallium-201 for myocardial imaging: Appearance of the normal heart. J Nucl Med. 1976;17:583–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferencik M, Abbara S, Hoffmann U, Cury RC, Brady TJ, Achenbach S. Left ventricular thin-point detection using multidetector spiral computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:949–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson KM, Johnson HE, Dowe DA. Left ventricular apical thinning as normal anatomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:334–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Verberne HJ, Acampa W, Anagnostopoulos C, Ballinger J, Bengel F, Bondt P de, et al. EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1929–40. https://eanm.org/publications/guidelines/2015_07_EANM_FINAL_myocardial_perfusion_guideline.pdf.

  19. Slomka P, Nishina H, Berman D, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman J, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gould KL, Nakagawa Y, Nakagawa K, Sdringola S, Hess MJ, Haynie M, et al. Frequency and clinical implications of fluid dynamically significant diffuse coronary artery disease manifest as graded, longitudinal, base-to-apex myocardial perfusion abnormalities by noninvasive positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2000;101:1931–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Valenta I, Quercioli A, Schindler TH. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:387–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernandez-Pampaloni M, Keng FY, Kudo T, Sayre JS, Schelbert HR. Abnormal longitudinal, base-to-apex myocardial perfusion gradient by quantitative blood flow measurements in patients with coronary risk factors. Circulation. 2001;104:527–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schindler TH, Facta AD, Prior JO, Campisi R, Inubushi M, Kreissl MC, et al. PET-measured heterogeneity in longitudinal myocardial blood flow in response to sympathetic and pharmacologic stress as a non-invasive probe of epicardial vasomotor dysfunction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1140–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartlett ML, Bacharach SL, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Dilsizian V. Artifactual inhomogeneities in myocardial PET and SPECT scans in normal subjects. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:188–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pretorius PH, Narayanan MV, Dahlberg ST, Leppo JA, King MA. The influence of attenuation and scatter compensation on the apparent distribution of Tc-99m sestamibi in cardiac slices. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8:356–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pretorius PH, King MA, Tsui BM, LaCroix KJ, Xia W. A mathematical model of motion of the heart for use in generating source and attenuation maps for simulating emission imaging. Med Phys. 1999;26:2323–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pretorius PH, King MA. A study of possible causes of artifactual decreases in the left ventricular apex with SPECT cardiac perfusion imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46:1016–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Links JM, Becker LC, Anstett F. Clinical significance of apical thinning after attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Okuda K, Nakajima K, Matsuo S, Kondo C, Sarai M, Horiguchi Y, et al. Creation and characterization of normal myocardial perfusion imaging databases using the IQ SPECT system. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0770-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Okuda K, Nakajima K, Matsuo S, Wakabayashi H, Taki J, Kinuya S. Cause of apical thinning on attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. Nucl Med Commun. 2011;32:1033–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomita Y, Ishida M, Ichikawa Y, Suzawa N, Kobayashi S, Maeda H, et al. The effect of misregistration between CT-attenuation and PET-emission images in 13N-ammonia myocardial PET/CT. J Nucl Med Technol. 2016;44:73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Klingensmith WC, Noonan C, Goldberg JH, Buchwald D, Kimball JT, Manson SM. Decreased perfusion in the lateral wall of the left ventricle in PET/CT studies with 13N-ammonia: Evaluation in healthy adults. J Nucl Med Technol. 2009;37:215–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goetze S, Brown TL, Lavely WC, Zhang Z, Bengel FM. Attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT: Effects of misregistration and value of reregistration. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1090–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors do not have any personal conflicts of interest to declare. However, the University Hospital Zurich holds a research contract with GE Healthcare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronny R. Buechel MD.

Additional information

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 527 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steffen, D.A., Giannopoulos, A.A., Grossmann, M. et al. “Apical thinning”: Relations between myocardial wall thickness and apical left ventricular tracer uptake as assessed with positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 27, 452–460 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1397-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1397-2

Keywords

Navigation