Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanical dyssynchrony according to validated cut-off values using gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to establish different degrees of mechanical dyssynchrony according to validated cut-off (CO) values of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT phase analysis parameters (SD, standard deviation; B, bandwidth; S, skewness; K, kurtosis).

Methods

Using Emory Cardiac Toolbox™, we prospectively analyzed 408 patients (mean age 64.1 years, 26.7% female), divided into a control group of 150 normal subjects and a validation group of 258 patients (left bundle branch block: 17.8%, right bundle branch block: 8.9%. atrial fibrillation: 16.3%, coronary revascularization: 30%, dilated cardiomyopathy: 7.4%. valvulopathies: 2.7%, ischemic test: 45.3%) with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac diseases, by means of phase analysis.

Results

Agreement of CO values (SD > 18.4°; B > 51°; S ≤ 3.2; K ≤ 9.3) used to discriminate between normal subjects and patients was strong (c-statistic 0.9; 95% CI 0.98-0.99). Four degrees of dyssynchrony were found according to the number of abnormal phase parameters. All patients with mechanical and electrical criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CCRT) (n: 82) had Grade 2 to 4 (two to four abnormal phase parameters). Agreement of CO values (SD > 40.2°; B > 132°; S ≤ 2.3; K ≤ 4.6) used to discriminate between patients with and without CCRT was strong (c-statistic 0.8; 95% CI 0.79-0.87) but 12% of patients with CCRT did not have any of these abnormal phase parameters.

Conclusions

The discriminatory capacity of gated SPECT phase analysis parameters between normal subjects and patients, and between patients with and without CCRT, is very good, making it possible to define different degrees of mechanical dyssynchrony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B :

Bandwidth

CO:

Cut-off

CCRT:

Criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy

EF:

Ejection fraction

K :

Kurtosis

LV:

Left ventricle

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

S :

Skewness

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Trimble MA, Borges-Neto S, Honeycutt EF, Shaw LK, Pagnanelli R, Chen J, et al. Evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony and myocardial perfusion using phase analysis of gated SPECT imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000;15:663–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen J, Garcia EV, Folks RD, Cooke CD, Faber TL, Tauxe EL, et al. Onset of left ventricular mechanical contraction as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Development of a diagnostic tool for assessment of cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:687–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trimble MA, Borges-Neto S, Smallheiser S, Chen J, Honeycutt EF, Shaw LK, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction disturbances. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:298–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trimble MA, Borges-Neto S, Honeycutt EF, Smallheiser S, Chen J, Shaw LK, et al. Evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony and myocardial perfusion using phase analysis of gated SPECT imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:663–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boogers MM, Chen J, Bax JJ. Myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23:431–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atchley AE, Trimble MA, Samad Z, Shaw LK, Pagnanelli R, Chen J, et al. Use of phase analysis of gated SPECT perfusion imaging to quantify dyssynchrony in patients with mild-to-moderate left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:888–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Samad Z, Atchley AE, Trimble MA, Sun JL, Shaw LK, Pagnanelli R, et al. Prevalence and predictors of mechanical dyssynchrony as defined by phase analysis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, et al. Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsan NA, Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Ghio S, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by two threedimensional imaging modalities: Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and tri-plane tissue Doppler imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Kriekinge SD, Nishina H, Ohba M, Berman DS, Germano G. Automatic global and regional phase analysis from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: application to the characterization of ventricular contraction in patients with left bundle branch block. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1790–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murrow J, Esteves F, Galt J, Chen J, Garcia E, Lin J, et al. Characterization of mechanical dyssynchrony measured by gated single photon emission computed tomography phase analysis after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:912–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aljaroudi WA, Hage FG, Hermann D, Doppalapudi H, Venkataraman R, Heo J, et al. Relation of left-ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated SPECT images and cardiovascular events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen J, Henneman MM, Trimble MA, Bax JJ, Borges-Neto S, Iskandrian AE, et al. Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:127–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen J, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Garcia EV. Temporal resolution of multiharmonic phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:383–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li D, Zhou Y, Feng J, Yuan D, Cao K, Garcia EV, et al. Impact of image reconstruction on phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. Nucl Med Commun. 2009;30:700–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CC, Huang WS, Hung GU, Chen WC, Kao CH, Chen J. Left-ventricular dyssynchrony evaluated by Tl-201 gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A comparison with Tc-99m sestamibi. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:229–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trimble MA, Velazquez EJ, Adams GL, Honeycutt EF, Pagnanelli RA, Barnhart HX, Chen J, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging used to quantify cardiac dyssynchrony. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:374–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Henneman MM, Chen J, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Bleeker GB, Ypenburg C, et al. Can LV dyssynchrony as assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict response to CRT? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pazhenkottil AP, Buechel RR, Husmann L, Nkoulou RN, Wolfrum M, Ghadri JR, et al. Long-term prognostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony assessment by phase analysis from myocardial perfusion imaging. Heart. 2011;97:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen J, Kalogeropoulos AP, Verdes L, Butler J, Garcia EV. Left-ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony as assessed by multi-harmonic phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease and normal LVEF. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:299–308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Romero-Farina G, Aguadé-Bruix S, Candell-Riera J, Pizzi MN, García-Dorado D. Cut-off values of myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT phase analysis parameters of normal subjects, and conduction and mechanical cardiac diseases. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:1247–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dickstein K, Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Daubert JC, Linde C, McMurray J, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), et al. Focused Update of ESC Guidelines on device therapy in heart failure: an update of the 2008 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure and the 2007 ESC guidelines for cardiac and resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2010;2010(31):2677–87.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin X, Xu H, Zhao X, Folks RD, Garcia EV, Soman P, et al. Repeatability of left ventricular dyssynchrony and function parameters in serial gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:811–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zafrir N, Nevzorov R, Bental T, Strasberg B, Gutstein A, Mats I, et al. Prognostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony by myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT in patients with normal and abnormal left ventricular functions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:532–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hess PL, Shaw LK, Fudim M, Iskandrian AE, Borges-Neto S. The prognostic value of mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony defined by phase analysis from gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging among patients with coronary heart disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2016 Jan 25 [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no financial conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago Aguadé-Bruix MD.

Additional information

See related editorial, doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0717-7.

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarizes the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 85 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 1391 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguadé-Bruix, S., Romero-Farina, G., Candell-Riera, J. et al. Mechanical dyssynchrony according to validated cut-off values using gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 25, 999–1008 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0684-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0684-z

Keywords

Navigation