Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of acquisition time and reconstruction algorithm on image quality, quantitative parameters, and clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Recently introduced iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery (RR) and noise-reduction technology seem promising for reducing scan time or radiation dose without loss of image quality. However, the relative effects of reduced acquisition time and reconstruction software have not previously been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of reduced acquisition time and reconstruction software on quantitative and qualitative myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) parameters using full time (FT) and half time (HT) protocols and Evolution for Cardiac Software.

Methods

We studied 45 consecutive, non-selected patients referred for a clinically indicated routine 2-day stress/rest 99mTc-Sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. All patients underwent an FT and an HT scan. Both FT and HT scans were processed according to our standard procedure with both ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) + filtered back projection (FBP) reconstructions and a second reconstruction of HT scans was performed with the RR software producing three datasets for each patient for visual analysis (FT-OSEM, HT-OSEM, and HT-RR) and for quantitative analysis (FT-FBP, HT-FBP, and HT-RR). The datasets were analyzed using commercially available QGS/QPS software and read by two observers evaluating image quality and clinical interpretation. Image quality was assessed on a 10-cm visual analog scale score.

Results

HT imaging was associated with loss of image quality that was compensated for by RR reconstruction. HT imaging was also associated with increasing perfusion defect extents, an effect more pronounced using RR than FBP reconstruction. Compared to standard FT-FBP, HT-RR significantly reduced left ventricular volumes whereas HT-FBP increased end-systolic volume. HT imaging had no effect on measured left ventricular ejections fraction or measures of reversibility. Image interpretation found a higher level of concordance between FT-OSEM and HT-RR than between FT-OSEM and HT-OSEM without any observable systematic effects.

Conclusions

Use of RR reconstruction algorithms compensates for loss of image quality associated with reduced scan time. Both HT acquisition and RR reconstruction algorithm had significant effects on motion and perfusion parameters obtained with standard software, but these effects were relatively small and probably of limited clinical importance. Although no systematic effects on image interpretation were observed, the influence on diagnostic accuracy remains to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging-executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318-33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:e44-164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taillefer R, Primeau M, Costi P, Lambert R, Leveille J, Latour Y. Technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in detection of coronary artery disease: Comparison between initial (1-hour) and delayed (3-hour) postexercise images. J Nucl Med 1991;32:1961-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DePuey EG, Nichols KJ, Slowikowski JS, Scarpa WJ Jr, Smith CJ, Melancon S, et al. Fast stress and rest acquisitions for technetium-99m-sestamibi separate-day SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995;36:569-74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Katz R, Brueckner M, Husmann L, Burger IA, et al. Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector technique: Optimized protocol for scan time reduction. J Nucl Med 2010;51:46-51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali I, Ruddy TD, Almgrahi A, Anstett FG, Wells RG. Half-time SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2009;50:554-62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valenta I, Treyer V, Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Schindler MJ, Herzog BA, et al. New reconstruction algorithm allows shortened acquisition time for myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:750-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Venero CV, Heller GV, Bateman TM, McGhie AI, Ahlberg AW, Katten D, et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new post-processing method with depth-dependent collimator resolution applied to full-time and half-time acquisitions without and with simultaneously acquired attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:714-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DePuey EG, Gadiraju R, Clark J, Thompson L, Anstett F, Shwartz SC. Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction “half-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: A comparison to “full-time” filtered backprojection. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:547-63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Daou D, Pointurier I, Coaguila C, Vilain D, Benada AW, Lebtahi R, et al. Performance of OSEM and depth-dependent resolution recovery algorithms for the evaluation of global left ventricular function in 201Tl gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2003;44:155-62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belhocine T. Evolution for Cardiac with Infinia Hawkeye cuts scan time. GE Healthcare: Haifa; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De LA, Fonseca LM, Landesmann MC, Lima RS. Comparison between short-acquisition myocardial perfusion SPECT reconstructed with a new algorithm and conventional acquisition with filtered backprojection processing. Nucl Med Commun 2010;31:552-7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Modi BN, Brown JL, Kumar G, Driver RM, Kelion AD, Peters AM, et al. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of the impact of three processing algorithms with halving of study count statistics in myocardial perfusion imaging: Filtered backprojection, maximal likelihood expectation maximisation and ordered subset expectation maximisation with resolution recovery. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:945-57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ficaro E, Krizman JN, Corbett JR. Effect of reconstruction parameters and acquisition times on myocardial perfusion distribution. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Borges-Neto S, Pagnanelli RA, Shaw LK, Honeycutt E, Shwartz SC, Adams GL, et al. Clinical results of a novel wide beam reconstruction method for shortening scan time of Tc-99m cardiac SPECT perfusion studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:555-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DePuey EG, Bommireddipalli S, Clark J, Thompson L, Srour Y. Wide beam reconstruction “quarter-time” gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: A comparison to “full-time” ordered subset expectation maximum. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:736-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DePuey EG, Bommireddipalli S, Clark J, Leykekhman A, Thompson LB, Friedman M. A comparison of the image quality of full-time myocardial perfusion SPECT vs wide beam reconstruction half-time and half-dose SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:273-80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Armstrong IS, Arumugam P, James JM, Tonge CM, Lawson RS. Reduced-count myocardial perfusion SPECT with resolution recovery. Nucl Med Commun 2012;33:121-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcassa C, Campini R, Zoccarato O, Calza P. Wide beam reconstruction for half-dose or half-time cardiac gated SPECT acquisitions: Optimization of resources and reduction in radiation exposure. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:499-508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson CN, van Aswegen A, Julious SA, Nunan TO, Thomson WH, Tindale WB, et al. The relationship between administered radiopharmaceutical activity in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and imaging outcome. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:329-35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zafrir N, Solodky A, Ben-Shlomo A, Mats I, Nevzorov R, Battler A, et al. Feasibility of myocardial perfusion imaging with half the radiation dose using ordered-subset expectation maximization with resolution recovery software. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:704-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Glostrup Hospital, Nordre Ringvej, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark

    Lotte H. Enevoldsen MD, PhD, Changez A. K. Menashi MD, Ulrik B. Andersen MD, Lars T. Jensen MD, DMSci & Otto M. Henriksen MD

Authors
  1. Lotte H. Enevoldsen MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Changez A. K. Menashi MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrik B. Andersen MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lars T. Jensen MD, DMSci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Otto M. Henriksen MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotte H. Enevoldsen MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enevoldsen, L.H., Menashi, C.A.K., Andersen, U.B. et al. Effects of acquisition time and reconstruction algorithm on image quality, quantitative parameters, and clinical interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 20, 1086–1092 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9775-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-013-9775-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation