Abstract
Seventy melon (Cucumis melo L.) accessions comprising of landraces, inbred lines, cultivars, wild relatives and exotic populations were characterized using fifteen fruit traits and 30 SSR markers. Overall, aim of this study was to investigate the genetic relatedness across origins, horticultural groups and accession categories. Significant differences were observed for days to first fruit maturity, fruit weight, fruits per vine, yield per plant, flesh thickness, fruit shape index, total soluble solids, β-carotene, ascorbic acid and titrable acidity. Twenty-four polymorphic SSRs detected 67 distinct alleles with moderate polymorphic information content (0.43) and genetic diversity (0.44). Observed heterozygosity (0.53) was higher than expected heterozygosity (0.48) which can be attributed to out-cross nature of melons. Neighbor joining tree based on SSRs diverged 70 accessions into six clusters independent of geographic sites of collections. Momordica and inodorus accessions formed distinct clusters, with some exceptions. Intermixing of landraces, modern cultivars and exotic accessions belonging to different taxa and geographic regions indicated genetic resemblance with each other. Hybridization among exotic and indigenous genetic resources can be utilized for genetic enhancement and introgression of new traits in modern melon cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burger Y, Sa’ar U, Paris H, Lewinsohn E, Katzir N, Tadmor Y, Schaffer A (2006) Genetic variability for valuable fruit quality traits in Cucumis melo. Isr J Plant Sci 54:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1560/ijps_54_3_233
Chiba N, Suwabe K, Nunome T, Hirai M (2003) Development of microsatellite markers in melon (Cucumis melo L.) and their application to major cucurbit crops. Breed Sci 53:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.53.21
Choudhary BR, Pandey S, Pandey S, Eguru S, Eguru S, Sharma SK (2015) DUS characterization of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) varieties. Indian J Agric Sci 85:1597–1601
Dhillon NPS, Ranjana R, Singh K, Eduardo I, Monforte AJ, Pitrat M, Dhillon NK, Singh PP (2007) Diversity among landraces of Indian snapmelon (Cucumis melo var. momordica). Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1267–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9108-2
Dhillon NPS, Monforte AJ, Pitrat M, Pandey S, Singh PK, Reitsma KR, Garcia-Mas J, Sharma A, McCreight JD (2011) Melon Landraces of India: contributions and importance. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, 35. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1989) Isolation of plant DNA from free tissue. Focus 12:3–15
Esquinas-Alcazar JT, Gulick P, International Board for Plant Genetic R (1983) Genetic resources of Cucurbitaceae: a global report. IBPGR Secretariat, Rome
Fergany M, Kaur B, Monforte AJ, Pitrat M, Rys C, Lecoq H, Dhillon NPS, Dhaliwal SS (2010) Variation in melon (Cucumis melo) landraces adapted to the humid tropics of southern India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:225–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9564-6
Gao P, Ma H, Luan F, Song H (2012) DNA fingerprinting of Chinese melon provides evidentiary support of seed quality appraisal. PLoS One 7:52431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052431
Garcia-Mas J, Monforte AJ, Arús P (2004) Phylogenetic relationships among Cucumis species based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequence and microsatellite markers. Plant Syst Evol 248:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-004-0170-y
Gonzalo MJ, Diaz A, Dhillon NPS, Reddy UK, Pico B, Monforte AJ (2019) Re-evaluation of the role of Indian germplasm as center of melon diversification based on genotyping-by-sequencing analysis. BMC Genom 20:448. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5784-0
Jagger IC, Scott GW (1937) Development of powdery mildew resistant cantaloup No. 45. USDA Circ 441:6
Kacar YA, Simsek O, Solmaz I, Sari N, Mendi YY (2012) Genetic diversity among melon accessions (Cucumis melo) from Turkey based on SSR markers. Genet Mol Res 11:4622–4631. https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.November.29.2
Kalia A, Sharma SP, Vashisht VK (2017) Scanning electron microscopy study of root tissue of muskmelon: transferring Fusarium wilt resistance from snapmelon to muskmelon. J Appl Nat Sci 9:1317–1323. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i3.1360
Luan F, Delannay I, Staub JE (2008) Chinese melon (Cucumis melo L.) diversity analyses provide strategies for germplasm curation, genetic improvement, and evidentiary support of domestication patterns. Euphytica 164:445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-008-9699-0
Manohar SH, Murthy HN (2012) Estimation of phenotypic divergence in a collection of Cucumis melo, including shelf-life of fruit. Sci Hortic 148:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.09.025
Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x
McCollum JP (1955) Distribution of carotenoids in the tomato. Food Res 20:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1955.tb16811.x
McCreight JD, Nerson H, Grumet R (1993) Melon (Cucumis melo L.). In: Kalloo G, Berch BO (eds) Genetic improvement of vegetable crops, 7th edn. Pergamon, Oxford
Mliki A, Staub JE, Zhangyong S, Ghorbel A (2001) Genetic diversity in melon (Cucumis melo L.): an evaluation of african germplasm. Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:587–597. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013840517032
Monforte AJ, Garcia-Mas J, Arus P (2003) Genetic variability in melon based on microsatellite variation. Plant Breed 122:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00848.x
Nandpuri KS, Singh S, Lal T (1975) Punjab sunehri: a new variety of muskmelon. Progress Farm 11:21–23
Nandpuri KS, Singh S, Lal T (1982) Punjab hybrid—a new variety of muskmelon. Progress Farm 18:3–4
Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19:153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02300753
Nuñez-Palenius HG, Gomez-Lim M, Ochoa-Alejo N, Grumet R, Lester G, Cantliffe DJ (2008) Melon fruits: genetic diversity, physiology, and biotechnology features. Crit Rev Biotechnol 28:13–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388550801891111
Pandey S, Rai M, Prasanna HC, Kalloo G (2008) ‘Kashi Madhu’: a new muskmelon cultivar with high total soluble solids. HortScience 43:245. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.1.245
Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006) DARwin Software. http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin
Petropoulos SA, Barros L, Ferreira ICFR (2019) Editorial: rediscovering local landraces: shaping horticulture for the future. Front Plant Sci 10:126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00126
Pitrat M (2016) Melon genetic resources: phenotypic diversity and horticultural taxonomy. In: Grumet R, Katzir N, Garcia-Mas J (eds) Genetics and genomics of Cucurbitaceae. Springer, Cham
Rajasekaran LR, Blake TJ (1999) New plant growth regulators protect photosynthesis and enhance growth under drought of Jack pine seedlings. J Plant Growth Regul 18:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007067
Román B, Gómez P, Picó B, López C, Janssen D (2019) Candidate gene analysis of Tomato Leaf Curl New Delhi virus resistance in Cucumis melo. Sci Hortic 243:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.07.005
Sensoy S, Büyükalaca S, Abak K (2007) Evaluation of genetic diversity in Turkish melons (Cucumis melo L.) based on phenotypic characters and RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9120-6
Singh M, Sharma SP, Sarao NK, Kaur S, Chhuneja P (2019) Molecular mapping of nuclear male-sterility gene ms-1 in muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). J Horticult Sci Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.1652119
Staub JE, Danin-Poleg Y, Fazio G, Horejsi T, Reis N, Katzir N (2000) Comparative analysis of cultivated melon groups (Cucumis melo L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA and simple sequence repeat markers. Euphytica 115:225–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004054014174
Staub JE, López-Sesé AI, Fanourakis N (2004) Diversity among melon landraces (Cucumis melo L.) from Greece and their genetic relationships with other melon germplasm of diverse origins. Euphytica 136:151–166. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000030667.63614.bd
Stepansky A, Kovalski I, Perl-Treves R (1999) Intraspecific classification of melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation. Plant Syst Evol 217:313–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00984373
Vashisht VK, Sharma SP (2016) MMSel 103: a new inbred of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). In: 4th national symposium on transforming indian agriculture towards food and nutritional security, ICAR-IGFRI, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, 20–21 February, 2016
Vashisht VK, Lal T, Thind TS, Sharma SP (2015) Utilization of wild melon (Cucumis callosus (Rottb.) Cogn.) to develop downy mildew resistant muskmelon inbred line MM-31. Acta Hortic 1241:729–734
Vashisht VK, Lal T, Sharma SP, Thind TS (2019) KP4HM-15: an inbred line of muskmelon resistant to Fusarium wilt. Acta Hortic. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2019.1241.71
Whitaker TW, Davis GN (1962) Cucurbits-botany, cultivation and utilization. Leonard Hill, London
Zhang C, Pratap AS, Natarajan S, Pugalendhi L, Kikuchi S, Sassa H, Senthil N, Koba T (2012) Evaluation of morphological and molecular diversity among south Asian germplasms of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis melo. ISRN Agron 2012:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/134134
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Department of Vegetable Science and the School of Agricultural Biotechnology, PAU, Ludhiana for financial support to conduct the study. We are also thankful to Dr. Gurteg Singh, Department of Fruit Science, PAU, Ludhiana for his help in data analysis and interpretation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, D., Leskovar, D.I., Sharma, S.P. et al. Genetic diversity and interrelationship among Indian and exotic melons based on fruit morphology, quality components and microsatellite markers. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26, 985–1002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00814-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00814-1