Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of orientation of transcription of a gene in an inverted transferred DNA repeat on transcriptional gene silencing in rice transgenics—a case study

  • Short communication
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied transgene silencing in two transgenic rice plants, OSM25 and COT-OSM4, which harboured two different types of right border (RB)-centered inverted transferred DNA (T-DNA) repeats (IRs). The T-DNA in OSM25 has three genes gus, OSM and hph, all under the transcriptional control of the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (P35S). The gus gene, which is proximal to the RB, is in a convergent orientation of transcription in the IR. OSM25 displayed silencing of all three transgenes. Nuclear run-on transcription analysis revealed that silencing of gus, OSM and hph genes in OSM25 operates at the transcriptional level. P35S showed hypermethylation in OSM25 plants. COT-OSM4 has P35S-driven gus and hph genes in its T-DNA. The hph gene, which is proximal to the RB, is in a divergent orientation of transcription in the IR. Unlike in OSM25, the transgenes in COT-OSM4 showed no silencing. These findings show that convergent orientation of transcription of a gene at the origin of an IR is important for transgene silencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

gus :

β-glucuronidase gene

hph :

Hygromycin phosphotransferase gene

IR:

Inverted T-DNA repeat

JF:

Junction fragment

LB:

Left T-DNA border

OSM :

Tobacco osmotin gene

P35S:

Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter

RB:

Right T-DNA border

References

  • Fojtova M, Van Houdt H, Depicker A, Kovarik A (2003) Epigenetic switch from posttranscriptional to transcriptional silencing is correlated with promoter hypermethylation. Plant Physiol 133:1240–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fojtova M, Bleys A, Bedrichova J, Van Houdt H, Krizova K, Depicker A, Kovarik A (2006) The trans-silencing capacity of invertedly repeated transgenes depends on their epigenetic state in tobacco. Nucl Acid Res 34:2280–2293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelvin SB (2003) Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:16–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs SLA, Kpodar P, DeLong CMO (1990) The effect of T-DNA copy number, position and methylation on reporter gene expression in tobacco transformants. Plant Mol Biol 15:851–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krizova K, Fojtova M, Depicker A, Kovarik A (2009) Cell culture-induced gradual and frequent epigenetic reprogramming of invertedly repeated tobacco transgene epialleles. Plant Physiol 149:1493–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok WW, Nester EW, Gordon MP (1985) Unusual plasmid DNA organization in an octopine crown gall tumor. Nucl Acid Res 13:459–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng L, Lemaux PG (2003) A simple and rapid method for nuclear run-on transcription assays in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21:65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mroczka A, Roberts PD, Fillatti JJ, Wiggins BE, Ulmasov T, Voelker T (2010) An intron sense suppression construct targeting soybean FAD2-1 requires a double-stranded RNA-producing inverted repeat T-DNA insert. Plant Physiol 153:882–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski K, Kunze R, DeVries S, Bisseling T (1994) Isolation of total, poly(A) and polysomal RNA from plant tissues. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant molecular biology manual, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp D5: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarn M, Eike MC, Meza TJ, Mercy IS, Jakobsen KS, Aalen RB (2006) An inverted repeat transgene with a structure that cannot generate double-stranded RNA, suffers silencing independent of DNA methylation. Transgenic Res 15:489–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sridevi G, Parameswari C, Rajamuni P, Veluthambi K (2006) Identification of hemizygous and homozygous transgenic rice plants in T1 generation by DNA blot analysis. Plant Biotechnol 23:531–534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sripriya R, Sangeetha M, Parameswari C, Veluthambi B, Veluthambi K (2011) Improved Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation and selectable marker elimination in transgenic rice by using a high copy number pBin19-derived binary vector. Plant Sci 180:766–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stam M, de Bruin R, Kenter S, van der Hoorn RAL, van Blokland R, Mol JNM, Kooter JM (1997) Post-transcriptional silencing of chalcone synthase in Petunia by inverted transgene repeats. Plant J 12:63–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. K. Dharmalingam, Madurai Kamaraj University for permission to use the Radioisotope facility. This work was funded by DBT, Government of India (Project Number-BT/PR9823/AGR/36/10/2007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karuppannan Veluthambi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramkumar, T.R., Parameswari, C., Sugapriya, T. et al. Effect of orientation of transcription of a gene in an inverted transferred DNA repeat on transcriptional gene silencing in rice transgenics—a case study. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21, 151–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-014-0273-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-014-0273-z

Keywords

Navigation