Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On embodied memetic evolution and the emergence of behavioural traditions in Robots

  • Regular Research Paper
  • Published:
Memetic Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes ideas and initial experiments in embodied imitation using e-puck robots, developed as part of a project whose aim is to demonstrate the emergence of artificial culture in collective robot systems. Imitated behaviours (memes) will undergo variation because of the noise and heterogeneities of the robots and their sensors. Robots can select which memes to enact, and—because we have a multi-robot collective—memes are able to undergo multiple cycles of imitation, with inherited characteristics. We thus have the three evolutionary operators: variation, selection and inheritance, and—as we describe in this paper—experimental trials show that we are able to demonstrate embodied movement-meme evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alissandrakis A, Nehaniv C, Dautenhahn K (2002) Imitation with ALICE: learning to imitate corresponding actions across dissimilar embodiments. IEEE Trans Systems Man Cybern Part A Systems Humans 32(4): 482–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alissandrakis A, Nehaniv C, Dautenhahn K (2007) Solving the correspondence problem in robotic imitation across embodiments: synchrony, perception and culture in artefacts. In: Nehaniv C, Dautenhahn K (eds) Imitation and social learning in robots, humans and animals, Chap 12. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 249–273

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alissandrakis A, Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K (2003) Synchrony and perception in robotic imitation across embodiments. In: IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, pp 923–930

  4. Billard A, Hayes G (1999) DRAMA, a connectionist architecture for control and learning in autonomous robots. Adapt Behav 7(1): 35–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackmore S (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dautenhahn K (1995) Getting to know each other: artificial social intelligence for autonomous robots. Robot Auton Syst 16: 333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demiris Y, Hayes G (2002) Imitation as a dual-route process featuring predictive and learning components: a biologically-plausible computational model. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv C (eds) Imitation in animals and artefacts, Chap 13. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demiris Y, Khadhouri B (2005) Hierarchical, attentive, multiple models for execution and recognition (HAMMER). In: Proceedings of ICRA 2005

  10. Gerkey BP, Vaughan RT, Stoy K, Howard A, Sukhatme GS, Matarić MJ (2001) Most valuable player: a robot device server for distributed control. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 1226–1231

  11. Hayes G, Demiris J (1994) Robot controller using learning by imitation. In: Proceedings of 2nd international symposium on intelligent robotic systems, pp 198–204

  12. Johnson M, Demiris Y (2004) Abstraction in recognition to solve the correspodence problem for robot imitation. In: Proceedings of towards autonomous robotic systems (TAROS), pp 63–70

  13. Liu W, Winfield AFT (2011) Open-hardware e-puck Linux extension board for experimental swarm robotics research. Microprocess Microsyst 35(1): 60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mataric MJ (2000) Getting humanoids to move and imitate. IEEE Intell Syst Appl 15(4): 18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meuth R, Lim MH, Ong YS, Wunsch D (2009) A proposition on memes and meta-memes in computing for higher-order learning. Memetic Comput 1: 85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mondada F, Bonani M, Raemy X, Pugh J, Cianci C, Klaptocz A, Magnenat S, Zufferey JC, Floreano D, Martinoli A (2009) The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of 9th conference on autonomous robot systems and competitions, pp 59–65

  17. Nehaniv, C, Dautenhahn, K (eds) (2007) Imitation and social learning in robots, humans and animals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nehaniv CL, Dautenhahn K (2002) The correspondence problem. In: Imitation in animals and artifacts, pp 41–61. MIT Press, Cambridge

  19. Nehaniv, CL, Dautenhahn, K (eds) (2002) Imitation in animals and artefacts. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scassellati B (1999) Knowing what to imitate and knowing when you succeed. In: Proceedings of AISB’99 symposium on imitation in animals and artefacts, pp 105–113

  21. Vaughan R (2008) Massively multi-robot simulation in stage. Swarm Intell 2(2–4): 189–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Winfield AFT, Erbas MD (2010) Screen recording showing animation of fig. 3. http://sites.google.com/site/artcultproject/mc-fig3

  23. Winfield AFT, Erbas MD (2010) Screen recording showing animation of fig. 6. http://sites.google.com/site/artcultproject/mc-fig6

  24. Winfield AFT, Griffiths F (2010) Towards the emergence of artificial culture in collective robot systems. In: Levi P, Kernbach S (eds) Symbiotic multi-robot organisms: reliability, adaptability, evolution. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

    Alan F. T. Winfield & Mehmet Dincer Erbas

Authors
  1. Alan F. T. Winfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehmet Dincer Erbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan F. T. Winfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winfield, A.F.T., Erbas, M.D. On embodied memetic evolution and the emergence of behavioural traditions in Robots. Memetic Comp. 3, 261–270 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-011-0063-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-011-0063-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation