Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic detection of collisions in elite level rugby union using a wearable sensing device

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elite rugby union teams currently employ the latest technology to monitor and evaluate the physical demands of training and games on their players. Tackling has been shown to be the most common cause of injury in rugby union, yet current player monitoring technology does not effectively evaluate player tackling measurements. Currently, to evaluate measurements specific to player tackles, a time-consuming manual analysis of player sensor data and video footage is required. The purpose of this work is to investigate tackle modeling techniques which can be utilised to automatically detect player tackles and collisions using sensing technology already being used by elite international and club level rugby union teams. This paper discusses issues relevant to automatic tackle analysis, describes a technique to detect tackles using sensing data and validates the technique by comparing automatically detected collisions to manually labeled collisions using data from elite club and international level players. The results of the validation show that the system is able to consistently identify collisions with very few false positives and false negatives, achieving a recall and precision rating of 0.933 and 0.958, respectively. The aim is that the automatically detected tackles can provide coaching, medical and strength and conditioning staff with objective tackle-specific measurements, in real time, which can be used in injury prevention and rehabilitation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuller CW, Brooks JHM, Cancea RJ, Hall J, Kemp SPT (2007) Contact events in rugby union and their propensity to cause injury. Br J Sports Med 41(12):862–867 (discussion 867)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garraway W, Lee A, Macleod D, Telfer J, Deary I, Murrat G (1999) Factors influencing tackle injuries in rugby union football. Br J Sports Med 33:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Takarada Y (2003) Evaluation of muscle damage after a rugby match with special reference to tackle plays. Br J Sports Med 37(5):416–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barris S, Button C (2008) A review of vision-based motion analysis in sport. Sports Med 38(12):1025–1043

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fuller CW, Molloy MG, Bagate C, Bahr R, Brooks JHM, Donson H et al (2007) Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studies of injuries in rugby union. Br J Sports Med 41(5):328–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes M, Franks I (2005) Analysis of passing sequences, shots and goals in soccer. J Sports Sci 23(5): 509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coughlan G, Green B, Pook P, Toolan E, O’Connor S (2011) The relationship between physical game demands and injury rehabilitation in international rugby union: a global positioning system analysis. Br J Sports Med 45(4):323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunniffe B, Proctor W, Baker JS, Davies B (2009) An evaluation of the physiological demands of elite rugby union using global positioning system tracking software. J Strength Cond Res 23(4):1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbero-Álvarez JC, Coutts A, Granda J, Barbero-Álvarez V, Castagna C (2010) The validity and reliability of a global positioning satellite system device to assess speed and repeated sprint ability (RSA) in athletes. J Sci Med Sport 13(2):232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coutts A, Duffield R (2010) Validity and reliability of GPS devices for measuring movement demands of team sports. J Sci Med Sport 13(1):133–135

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lau HY, Tong KY, Zhu H (2009) Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions of persons after stroke with dropped foot. Human Mov Sci 28(4):504–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfeiffer M, Hohmann A (2011) Applications of neural networks in training science. Human Mov Sci [Epub ahead of print]

  13. Silva A, Costa A, Oliveira P, Reis V (2007) The use of neural network technology to model swimming performance. J Sports Sci Med 6:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jäger J (2011) Identifying individuality and variability in team tactics by means of statistical shape analysis and multilayer perceptrons. Human Mov Sci [Epub ahead of print]

  15. Maier KD, Wank V, Bartonietz K, Blickhan R (2000) Neural network based models of javelin flight: prediction of flight distances and optimal release parameters. Sports Eng 3(1):57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamb PF, Bartlett RM, Robins A (2011) Artificial neural networks for analyzing inter-limb coordination: the golf chip shot. Human Mov Sci 30(6):1129–1143

    Google Scholar 

  17. Billing DC, Nagarajah CR, Hayes JP, Baker J (2006) Predicting ground reaction forces in running using micro-sensors and neural networks. Sports Eng 9(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee M, Roan M, Smith B, Lockhart TE (2009) Gait analysis to classify external load conditions using linear discriminant analysis. Human Mov Sci 28(2):226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Janssen D, Schöllhorn WI, Newell KM, Jäger JM, Rost F, Vehof K (2010) Diagnosing fatigue in gait patterns by support vector machines and self-organizing maps. Human Mov Sci 30(5):966–975

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chang C, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2(3):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang SB, Quattoni A, Morency LP, Demirdjian D, Darrell T (2006) Hidden conditional random fields for gesture recognition. Proc IEEE Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 2:1521–1527

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rabiner LR (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, pp 257–286

  23. Kelly D, Mc Donald J, Markham C (2011) Weakly supervised training of a sign language recognition system using multiple Instance learning density matrices. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B (Cybernetics) 41(2):526–541

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freund Y, Schapire R (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55:119–139

    Google Scholar 

  25. Valentini G, Dietterich T (2004) Bias–variance analysis of support vector machines for the development of SVM-based ensemble methods. J Mach Learn Res 5:725–775

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Brooks JHM, Kemp SPT (2010) Injury–prevention priorities according to playing position in professional rugby union players. Br J Sports Med 45(10):765–775

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Kelly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, D., Coughlan, G.F., Green, B.S. et al. Automatic detection of collisions in elite level rugby union using a wearable sensing device. Sports Eng 15, 81–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-012-0088-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-012-0088-5

Keywords

Navigation