Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is characterized by hormone dependency, and endocrine therapy is a key treatment in breast cancer. Recently, targeted therapies such as Trastuzumab treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer has been important. Triple-negative (TN) breast cancer is characterized by lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), and the absence of HER2 protein overexpression, and so there is no targeted therapy for this subtype. In this study, we examined the biological and prognostic characteristics in TN breast cancer.

Patients and methods

Between January 1998 and September 2006, 1,552 patients with primary breast cancer were investigated retrospectively in this study and ER, PgR and HER2 status were evaluated in all cases. Furthermore, p53 overexpression and Ki67 values were examined immunohistochemically.

Results

Patient distribution according to ER, PgR or HER2 status was as follows: ER and PgR positive: 57.9%, and ER and PgR negative: 25.1%. With regards to the HER2 status, HER2 positive was 23.3%, and triple negative (TN) was 14.0%. TN breast cancer has a high proliferation rate, high nuclear grade and frequent p53 overexpression. Patients with TN tumors had a significantly poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than those with non-TN tumors. After recurrence the overall survival (OS) rate in TN cases was significantly lower than that of the non-TN cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that TN was a significant factor for DFS and OS after recurrence.

Conclusion

TN breast cancer is a rare subtype with a high proliferation rate and a high nuclear grade, p53 overexpression, and lower DFS/OS. To improve the prognosis of TN breast cancer, a new effective strategy needs to be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10869–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sørlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kai K, Nishimura R, Arima N, et al. p53 expression status is a significant molecular marker in predicting the time to endocrine therapy failure in recurrent breast cancer: a cohort study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2006;11:426–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Umemura S, Kurosumi M, Moriya T, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation for hormone receptors in breast cancer: a practically useful evaluation system and handling protocol. Breast Cancer. 2006;13:232–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: results from the BIG 1–98 collaborative groups. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3846–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishimura R, Matsuda M, Miyayama H, et al. Proliferative activity evaluated by MIB-1 predicts the time and type of recurrence in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;82(Suppl 1):S165.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finnegan TJ, Carey LA. Gene-expression analysis and the basal-like breast cancer subtype. Future Oncol. 2007;3:55–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleator S, Heller W, Coombes RC. Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:235–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina breast cancer study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brenton JD, Carey LA, Ahmed AA, et al. Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application? J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7350–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5367–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matos I, Dufloth R, Alvarenga M, et al. p63, cytokeratin 5, and P-cadherin: three molecular markers to distinguish basal phenotype in breast carcinomas. Virchows Arch. 2005;447:688–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siziopikou KP, Cobleigh M. The basal subtype of breast carcinomas may represent the group of breast tumors that could benefit from EGFR-targeted therapies. Breast. 2007;16:104–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yehiely F, Moyano JV, Evans JR, et al. Deconstructing the molecular portrait of basal-like breast cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12(11):537–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abd El-Rehim DM, Ball G, Pinder SE, et al. High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses. Int J Cancer. 2005;116:340–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Foulkes WD, Brunet JS, Stefansson IM, et al. The prognostic implication of the basal-like (cyclin E high/p27 low/p53+/glomeruloid-microvascular-proliferation+) phenotype of BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:830–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, et al. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer registry. Cancer. 2007;109:1721–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nishimura R, Okumura Y, Arima N. Trastuzumab monotherapy versus combination therapy for treating recurrent breast cancer: time to progression and survival. Breast Cancer 2008;15(1):57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishimura R, Nagao K, Miyayama H, et al. An evaluation of predictive factors involved in clinical or pathological response to primary chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2002;9:145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5678–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayes DF, Thor A, Dressler L, et al. HER2 predicts benefit from adjuvant paclitaxel after AC in node positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 (ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I, vol 24, No. 18S, 20 June Supplement: 510, 2006)

  24. Miller KD, Sledge GW, Burstein HJ. Angiogenesis inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer: a review of studies presented at the 2006 san antonio breast cancer symposium. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2007;5:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto City Hospital, 1-1-60 Kotoh, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 862-8505, Japan

    Reiki Nishimura

  2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Kumamoto City Hospital, 1-1-60 Kotoh, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 862-8505, Japan

    Nobuyuki Arima

Authors
  1. Reiki Nishimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nobuyuki Arima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reiki Nishimura.

About this article

Cite this article

Nishimura, R., Arima, N. Is triple negative a prognostic factor in breast cancer?. Breast Cancer 15, 303–308 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-008-0042-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-008-0042-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation