Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spectrum of Perforation Peritonitis in Delhi: 77 Cases Experience

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perforation peritonitis is the most common surgical emergency encountered by surgeons all over the world as well in India. The spectrum of etiology of perforation peritonitis in tropical countries continues to differ from its western counterpart. This study was conducted at Hindu Rao Hospital, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, New Delhi, India, designed to highlight the spectrum of perforation peritonitis in the eastern countries and to improve its outcome. This prospective study included 77 consecutive patients of perforation peritonitis studied in terms of clinical presentations, causes, site of perforation, surgical treatment, postoperative complications, and mortality at Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, from March 1, 2011 to December 1, 2011, over a period of 8 months. All patients were resuscitated and underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. On laparotomy cause of perforation peritonitis was found and controlled. The most common cause of perforation peritonitis noticed in our series was perforated duodenal ulcer (26.4 %) and ileal typhoid perforation (26.4 %), each followed by small bowel tuberculosis (10.3 %) and stomach perforation (9.2 %), perforation due to acute appendicitis (5 %). The highest number of perforations was seen in ileum (39.1 %), duodenum (26.4 %), stomach (11.5 %), appendix (3.5 %), jejunum (4.6 %), and colon (3.5 %). Overall mortality was 13 %. The spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India continuously differs from western countries. The highest number of perforations was noticed in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract as compared to the western countries where the perforations seen mostly in the distal part. The most common cause of perforation peritonitis was perforated duodenal ulcer and small bowel typhoid perforation followed by typhoid perforation. Large bowel perforations and malignant perforations were least common in our setup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC (2007) Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician 1(7697):1005–1012

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma L, Gupta S, Soin AS, Sikora S, Kapoor V (1991) Generalized peritonitis in India. The tropical spectrum. Jpn J Surg 21(3):272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ersumo T, WMeskel Y, Kotisso B (2005) Perforated peptic ulcer in Tikur Anbessa Hospital; a review of 74 cases. Ethiop Med J 43(1):9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosscha K, van Vroonhoven TJ, Werken C (1999) Surgical management of severe secondary peritonitis. Br J Surg 86(11):1371–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adesunkanmi AK, Badmus TA, Fadiora FO, Agbakwuru EA (2005) Generalized peritonitis secondary to typhoid ileal perforation: Assessment of severity using modified APACHE II score. Indian J Surg 67:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adesunkanmi ARK, Badmus TA, Ogundoyin OO (2003) Causes and determinants of outcome of intestinal perforations in a semi urban African community. Surg Pract 7(4):116–123

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwall N, Saha S, Srivastava A, Chumber S, Dhar A, Garg S (2007) Peritonitis 10 years experience in a single surgical unit. Trop Gastroenterol 28(3):117–120

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malangoni MA, Inui T (2006) Peritonitis the western experience. World J Emerg Surg 1:25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta S, Kaushik R (2006) Peritonitis—the Eastern experience. World J Emerg Surg 1:13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH, Tai YP, Li MK (2002) Laproscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235(3):313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Jhobta A (2006) Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India—review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emerg Surg 1:26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Veliyev NA, Merrell RC (2004) Differentiated approach to surgical treatment of patients with perforatred duodenal ulcer. Chirurgia (Bucur) 99(2):119–123

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koninger J, Bottinger P, Redeeke J, Butters M (2004) Laproscopic repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer by running suture. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389(1):11–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohene-Yeboah M, Togbe B (2006) Perforated gastric and duodenal ulcers in an urban African population. West Afr J Med 25(3):205–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Franco R, Simone R, Daniele M, Giovanni DM, Corrado P, Paolo M, Giovanni C, Enrico P (2006) Perforated gastric carcinoma; a report of 10 cases and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 4:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sefr R, Rotterova P, Konecny J (2001) Perforation peritonitis in primary intestinal tuberculosis. Case report. Dig Surg 18(6):475–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Collado C, Stirnemann J, Ganne N, Trinchet JC, Cruaud P, Barrat C, Benichou J, Lhote F, Malbec D, Martin A, Prevot S, Fain O (2005) Gastrointestinal tuberculosis: 17 cases collected in 4 hospitals in the northeastern suburb of Paris. Gastroenterol Clin Boil 9(4):419–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muquit S, Shah M, Abayajeewa K (2006) Acase of milliary tuberculosis presenting with bowel perforation: Newham University Hospital, London, UK. Emerg Med J 23(11):e62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma MP, Vikram B (2004) Abdominal tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 120:305–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Seward E (1920) Hyperplastic tuberculosis of the intestine. Ann Surg 71(5):637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kasahara K, Fukuoka K, Okamura H, Mikasa K, Narita N, Kimura H (2005) Tuberculous peritonitis developing during chemotherapy for pulmonary and intestinal tuberculosis. Respirology 10(29):257–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ara C, Sogutlu G, Yildiz R, Kocak O, Isik B, Yilmaz S, Kirimlioglu V (2005) Spontaneous small bowel perforation due to intestinal tuberculosis should not be repaired by simple closure. J Gastrointest Surg 9(4):514–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramesh J, Banait GS, Ormerod LP (2008) Abdominal tuberculosis in a district general hospital. A retrospective review of 86 cases. QJM 10(3):189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saxe JM, Cropsey R (2005) Is operative management effective in treatment of perforated typhoid? Am J Surg 189(3):342–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramachandran CS, Agarwal S, Dip DG, Arora V (2004) Laproscopic surgical management of perforative peritonitis in enteric fever: a preliminary study. Surg Laprosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14(3):122–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Venere B, Testini M, Miniello S, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Carbone F, Bonomo GM (2002) Rectal perforations. Personal experience and literature review. Minerva Chir 57(3):357–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Breitenstein S, Kraus A, Hahnloser D, Decurtins M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2007) Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation: Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure? A case matched control study. World J Surg 31(11):2117–2124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oheneh-yeboah M (2007) Postoperative complications after surgery for typhoid illeal perforation in adults in Kumasi. West Afr J Med 26(1):32–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozman MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Kece C, Aslar AK, Ozalp N, Koc M (2002) Factors influencing mortality in spontaneous gastric tumor perforations. J Inter Med Res 30(2):180–184

    Google Scholar 

  30. Capoor MR, Nair D, Chintamani MS, Khanna A, Bhatnagar D (2008) Role of Enteric fever in ileal perforation. Indian J Med Microbiol 26:54–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shinkawa H, Yasuhara H, Naka S, Yanagie H, Nojiri T, Furuya Y, Arikiand K, Niwa H (2003) Factors afecting the early mortality of patients with non traumatic colorectal perforation. Surg Today 33:13–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Uccheddu A, Floris G, Altana ML, Pisanu A, Cois A, Farci SL (2003) Surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in the elderly. Evaluation of factors influencing prognosis. Hepatogastroenterology 50(54):1956–1958

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Subramanyam SG, Sunder N, Saleem KM, c AB (2005) Peritonitis in patients over the age of 50 years: 98 cases managed surgically. Trop Doct 35(4):247–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am thankful to Dr D.R. Meena for critical review of manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinesh Yadav.

Additional information

Perforation peritonitis is a common surgical emergency allover world. In india typhoid and tubercular perforation are common.

Hindurao hospital is biggest hospital of municipal corporation of delhi having tertiary care facilities. This hospital has 24 h emergency, surgical ICU and senior surgeons on emergency call duty. The perforation patientsa are managed according to general condition and operative finding of patient either- primary repair, resection anastomosis or stoma formation.

77 patients included in this study having GI perforations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yadav, D., Garg, P.K. Spectrum of Perforation Peritonitis in Delhi: 77 Cases Experience. Indian J Surg 75, 133–137 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0609-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0609-2

Keywords

Navigation