Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrogen Retention in Coastal Marine Sediments—a Field Study of the Relative Importance of Biological and Physical Removal in a Danish Estuary

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to elucidate the relative importance of physical versus biological loss processes for the removal of microphytobenthic (MPB) bound nitrogen in a coastal environment at different times of the year via a dual isotope labeling technique. We used 51Cr, binding to inorganic sediment particles but not participating in any biological processes, and 15N–NO3 , taken up by the MPB and turned over as part of the MPB nitrogen pool. Retention, down-mixing, and export of 15N were due to both biological and physical processes, so that by comparing retention of the two isotopes, we were able to discern the relative importance of physical and biological processes. The isotope marking was supplemented with measurements of sediment chlorophyll biomass and oxygen fluxes, allowing us to evaluate MPB biomass as well as primary production vs. respiration in the sediment. In spring/early summer, the system was characterized by tight N cycling and high N retention: any remineralized N was immediately taken up and retained in the MPB biomass. In late summer and autumn, the system was still physically stable, but high biological mediated N losses were observed. In early winter, the system was physically dominated due to low MPB biomasses and activity combined with a significant storm event. Our data support the hypothesis that the relative balance between physical and biological processes in determining retention and removal of MPB-bound nitrogen changes seasonally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, S., and S.B. Joye. 2001. Enhancement of coupled nitrification-denitrification by benthic photosynthesis in shallow estuarine sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 62–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barranguet, C., J. Kromkamp, and J. Peene. 1998. Factors controlling primary production and photosynthetic characteristics of intertidal microphytobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 173: 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, J.R., J.P. Riley, and P.J.L. Williams. 1976. Winkler procedure for making precise measurements of oxygen concentration for productivity and related studies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 21: 191–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, L.B., and J.E. Cooke. 1992. Benthic microalgal production in Onslow Bay, North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 84: 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calow, P., and C.R. Fletcher. 1972. A new radiotracer technique involving 14C and 51Cr, for estimating the assimilation efficiencies of aquatic, primary consumers. Oecologia 9: 155–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, J. 2015. Denmark—DMI historical climate data collection 1768–2014. In Technical Report 15–02. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Meteorological Institute.

  • Dalsgaard, T. 2003. Benthic primary production and nutrient cycling in sediments with benthic microalgae and transient accumulation of macroalgae. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 2138–2150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W.K. 2003. The role of periphyton in phosphorus retention in shallow freshwater aquatic systems. Journal of Phycology 39: 840–849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floder, S., A. Combuchen, A. Pasternak, and H. Hillebrand. 2006. Competition between pelagic and benthic microalgae for phosphorus and light. Aquatic Sciences 68: 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W.R., M.G. Ryon, and E.M. Schilling. 1995. Light limitation in a stream ecosystem: responses by primary producers and consumers. Ecology 76: 1297–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, G.A., S. Langtry, J. Fitzpatrick, R. Griffiths, and C.A. Jacoby. 1998. Benthic microalgae and nutrient dynamics in wave-distributed environments in Marmion lagoon, Western Australia, compared with less disturbed mesocosms. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228: 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, E., G. Penha-Lopes, M. Delefosse, T. Valdemarsen, C.O. Quintana, and G.T. Banta. 2012. What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Marine Ecology Progress Series 446: 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, H.L., R.J. Geider, and D.C. Miller. 1996. Microphytobenthos: the ecological role of the "secret garden" of unvegetated, shallow-water marine habitats. I. Distribution, abundance and primary production. Estuaries 19: 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maire, O., P. Lecroart, F. Meysman, R. Rosenberg, J.C. Duchene, and A. Gremare. 2008. Quantification of sediment reworking rates in bioturbation research: a review. Aquatic Biology 2: 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A., and K. Sundbäck. 2000. Diel variation in microphytobenthic productivity in areas of different tidal amplitude. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205: 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.C., R.J. Geider, and H.L. MacIntyre. 1996. Microphytobenthos: the ecological role of the "secret garden" of unvegetated, shallow water marine habitats. II. Role in sediment stability and shallow-water food webs. Estuaries 19: 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risgaard-Petersen, N. 2003. Coupled nitrification-denitrification in autotrophic and heterotrophic estuarine sediments: on the influence of benthic microalgae. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 93–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Risgaard-Petersen, N., S. Rysgaard, L.P. Nielsen, and N.P. Revsbech. 1994. Diurnal variation of denitrification and nitrification in sediments colonized by benthic microphytes. Limnology and Oceanography 39: 573–579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rysgaard, S., P.B. Christensen, and L.P. Nielsen. 1995. Seasonal variation in nitrification and denitrification in estuarine sediment colonized by benthic microalgae and bioturbating infauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126: 111–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, G., and G. Thouzeau. 1998. Microphytobenthic biomass in the Bay of Brest and the western English Channel. Oceanologica Acta 21: 677–694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandnes, J., T. Forbes, R. Hansen, and B. Sandnes. 2000. Influence of particle type and faunal activity on mixing of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in natural sediments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 197: 151–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbäck, K., and W. Granéli. 1988. Influence of microphytobenthos on the nutrient flux between sediment and water: a laboratory study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 43: 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbäck, K., F. Linares, F. Larson, and A. Wulff. 2004. Benthic nitrogen fluxes along a depth gradient in a microtidal fjord: the role of denitrification and microphytobenthos. Limnology and Oceanography 49: 1095–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbäck, K., and A. Miles. 2000. Balance between denitrification and microalgal incorporation of nitrogen in microtidal sediments, NE Kattegat. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 22: 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbäck, K., and A. Miles. 2002. Role of microphytobenthos and denitrification for nutrient turnover in embayments with floating macroalgal mats: a spring situation. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 30: 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbäck, K., A. Miles, and E. Göransson. 2000. Nitrogen fluxes, denitrification and the role of microphytobenthos in microtidal shallow-water sediments: an annual study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 200: 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, C., A. Giblin, J. McClelland, J. Tucker, and B. Peterson. 2003. Sediment DIN fluxes and preferential recycling of benthic microalgal nitrogen in a shallow macrotidal estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 257: 25–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G.J.C., and J. Kromkamp. 1999. Primary production by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos in estuaries. In Estuaries, ed. D.B. Nedwell and D. Raffaelli, 93–153. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Widdows, J., A. Blauw, C.H.R. Heip, P.M.J. Herman, C.H. Lucas, J.J. Middelburg, S. Schmidt, M.D. Brinsley, F. Twisk, and H. Verbeek. 2004. Role of physical and biological processes in sediment dynamics of a tidal flat in Westerschelde estuary, SW Netherlands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 274: 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdows, J., and M.D. Brinsley. 2002. Impact of biotic and abiotic processes on sediment dynamics and the consequences to the structure and functioning of the intertidal zone. Journal of Sea Research 48: 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysebaert, T., M. Fettweis, P. Meire, and M. Sas. 2005. Benthic variability in intertidal soft-sediments in the mesohaline part of the Schelde estuary. Hydrobiologia 540: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Laurentius Nielsen.

Additional information

Communicated by David Reide Corbett

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nielsen, S.L., Risgaard-Petersen, N. & Banta, G.T. Nitrogen Retention in Coastal Marine Sediments—a Field Study of the Relative Importance of Biological and Physical Removal in a Danish Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 40, 1276–1287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0216-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0216-3

Keywords

Navigation