Abstract
Intertidal marshes provide an important foraging habitat for resident marsh fishes. However, few studies have considered whether the importance of intertidal foraging is uniform across the adult-size range of marsh fishes or whether size-selective foraging, which has been demonstrated in intertidal habitats, also occurs in subtidal habitats. This study compares diet composition of adult mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) in Hoffler Creek, VA, USA, foraging in intertidal salt marshes with the diet of individuals foraging in the subtidal creek and considers the effect of fish size on gut fullness and consumption of major intertidal and subtidal diet items. Gut fullness was significantly greater in the intertidal salt marsh for small mummichogs (40–60 mm total length), and small mummichogs were significantly more likely than larger individuals to consume several major intertidal diet items, including copepods and ostracods. However, gut fullness was greater in the subtidal creek for large mummichogs (70–90 mm total length (TL)) due to consumption of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp.). This diet item was rarely consumed by large mummichogs in the marsh or by smaller mummichogs in either habitat. Modifications to the marsh landscape that affect prey resources for fishes may, therefore, have differing impacts across adult size classes. Although subtidal habitats are not frequently considered important for foraging of marsh fishes, access to shallow, subtidal water may allow larger adults to take advantage of additional prey resources, such as shrimp.
References
Allen, E.A., P.E. Fell, M.A. Peck, J.A. Gieg, C.R. Guthke, and M.D. Newkirk. 1994. Gut contents of common mummichogs, Fundulus heteroclitus L., in a restored impounded marsh and in natural reference marshes. Estuaries 17: 462–471.
Babkin, B.P., and D.J. Bowie. 1928. The digestive system and its function in Fundulus heteroclitus. Biological Bulletin 54: 254–277.
Banikas, E.M., and J.S. Thompson. 2012. Predation risk experienced by mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, in intertidal and subtidal salt marsh habitats. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 1346–1352.
Bowen, S.H. 1996. Quantitative description of the diet. In Fisheries techniques, 2nd ed, ed. B.M. Murphy and D.W. Willis, 513–532. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.
Currin, C.A., S.Y. Newell, and H.W. Paerl. 1995. The role of standing dead Spartina alterniflora and benthic microalgae in salt marsh food webs: considerations based on multiple stable isotope analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 121: 99–116.
Deegan, L.A., J.E. Hughes, and R.A. Rountree. 2000. Salt marsh ecosystem support of marine transient species. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 333–365. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Denno, R.F., M.E. Schauff, S.W. Wilson, and K.L. Olmstead. 1987. Practical diagnosis and natural history of two sibling salt marsh-inhabiting planthoppers in the genus Prokelisia (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 89: 687–700.
Fell, P.E., S.P. Weissbach, D.A. Jones, M.A. Fallon, J.A. Zeppieri, E.K. Faison, K.A. Lennon, K.J. Newberry, and L.K. Reddington. 1998. Does invasion of oligohaline tidal marshes by reed grass, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., affect the availability of prey resources for the mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus L.? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 22: 59–77.
Goto, D., and W.G. Wallace. 2011. Altered feeding habits and strategies of a benthic forage fish (Fundulus heteroclitus) in chronically polluted tidal salt marshes. Marine Environmental Research 72: 75–88.
Hampel, H., and A. Cattrijsse. 2004. Temporal variation in feeding rhythms in a tidal marsh population of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Kroyer, 1838). Aquatic Sciences 66: 315–326.
Heck Jr., K.L., and T.A. Thoman. 1981. Experiments on predator–prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 53: 125–134.
Hyslop, E.J. 1980. Stomach contents analyses—a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17: 411–429.
James-Pirri, M.J., K.B. Raposa, and J.G. Catena. 2001. Diet composition of mummichogs, Fundulus heteroclitus, from restoring and unrestricted regions of a New England (U.S.A.) salt marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53: 205–213.
Javonillo, R., L. Deegan, K. Chiaravalle, and J. Hughes. 1997. The importance of access to salt-marsh surface to short-term growth of Fundulus heteroclitus in a New England salt marsh. Biological Bulletin 193: 288–289.
Jobling, M. 1981. Mathematical models of gastric emptying and the estimation of daily rates of food consumption for fish. Journal of Fish Biology 19: 245–257.
Jobling, M. 1994. Fish bioenergetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
Kleypas, J., and J.M. Dean. 1983. Migration and feeding of the predatory fish, Bairdiella chrysura Lacepede, in an intertidal creek. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 72: 199–209.
Kneib, R.T. 1986. The role of Fundulus heteroclitus in salt marsh trophic dynamics. American Zoologist 26: 259–269.
Kneib, R.T. 1997. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton. In Oceanography and marine biology: an annual review, volume 35, ed. A.D. Ansell, R.N. Gibson, and M. Barnes, 163–220. London: UCL Press.
Kneib, R.T., and A.E. Stiven. 1978. Growth, reproduction, and feeding of Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) on a North Carolina salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 31: 121–140.
Kneib, R.T., and A.E. Stiven. 1982. Benthic invertebrate responses to size and density manipulations of the common mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, in an intertidal salt marsh. Ecology 63: 1518–1532.
Kneib, R.T., A.E. Stiven, and E.B. Haines. 1980. Stable carbon isotope ratios in Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) muscle tissue and gut contents from a North Carolina Spartina marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 46: 89–98.
Kreeger, D.A., and R.I.E. Newell. 2000. Trophic complexity between producers and invertebrate consumers in salt marshes. In Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 187–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Laffaille, P., J.-C. Lefeuvre, M.-T. Schricke, and E. Feunteun. 2001. Feeding ecology of 0-group sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax, in salt marshes on Mont Saint Michel Bay (France). Estuaries 24: 116–125.
Laffaille, P., J. Pétillon, E. Parlier, L. Valéry, F. Ysnel, A. Radureau, E. Feunteun, and J.-C. Lefeuvre. 2005. Does the invasive plant Elymus athericus modify fish diet in tidal salt marshes? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 65: 739–746.
Madon, S.P., G.D. Williams, J.M. West, and J.B. Zedler. 2001. The importance of marsh access to growth of the California killifish, Fundulus parvipinnis, evaluated through bioenergetics modeling. Ecological Modelling 135: 149–165.
McMahon, K.W., B.J. Johnson, and W.G. Ambrose Jr. 2005. Diet and movement of the killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, in a Maine salt marsh assessed using gut contents and stable isotope analyses. Estuaries 28: 966–973.
Minello, T.J., and R.J. Zimmerman. 1983. Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: the effect of simulated Spartina structure on predation rates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 72: 211–231.
Moy, L.D., and L.A. Levin. 1991. Are Spartina marshes a replaceable resource? A functional approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts. Estuaries 14: 1–16.
Peterson, B.J., and R.W. Howarth. 1987. Sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen isotopes used to trace organic matter flow in the salt-marsh estuaries of Sapelo Island, Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 32: 1195–1213.
Quinn, G.P., and M.J. Keough. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rountree, R.A., and K.W. Able. 1992. Foraging habits, growth, and temporal patterns of salt-marsh creek habitat use by young-of-year summer flounder in New Jersey. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121: 765–776.
Rozas, L.P., and M.W. LaSalle. 1990. A comparison of the diets of Gulf killifish, Fundulus grandis Baird and Girard, entering and leaving a Mississippi brackish marsh. Estuaries 13: 332–336.
Ruiz, G.M., A.H. Hines, and M.H. Posey. 1993. Shallow water as a refuge habitat for fish and crustaceans in non-vegetated estuaries: an example from Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99: 1–16.
Schein, A., S.C. Courtenay, K.A. Kidd, K.A. Campbell, and M.R. van den Heuvel. 2013. Food web structure within an estuary of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence undergoing eutrophication. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70: 1805–1812.
Smith, G.M., and J.S. Weis. 1997. Predator–prey relationships in mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus (L.)): effects of living in a polluted environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 209: 75–87.
Smith, K.J., G.L. Taghon, and K.W. Able. 2000. Trophic linkages in marshes: ontogenetic changes in diet for young-of-the-year mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 221–237. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Teo, S.L.H., and K.W. Able. 2003. Habitat use and movement of the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) in a restored salt marsh. Estuaries 26: 720–730.
Valiela, I., J.E. Wright, J.M. Teal, and S.B. Volkmann. 1977. Growth, production and energy transformations in the salt marsh killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Marine Biology 40: 135–144.
Vince, S., I. Valiela, N. Backus, and J.M. Teal. 1976. Predation by the salt marsh killifish Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) in relation to prey size and habitat structure: consequences for prey distribution and abundance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 23: 255–266.
Wainright, S.C., M.P. Weinstein, K.W. Able, and C.A. Currin. 2000. Relative importance of benthic microalgae, phytoplankton, and the detritus of smooth cordgrass Spartina alterniflora and the common reed Phragmites australis to brackish-marsh food webs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 200: 77–91.
Weisberg, S.B., and V.A. Lotrich. 1982. The importance of an infrequently flooded intertidal marsh surface as an energy source for the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus: an experimental approach. Marine Biology 66: 307–310.
Weisberg, S.B., R. Whalen, and V.A. Lotrich. 1981. Tidal and diurnal influence on food consumption of a salt marsh killifish Fundulus heteroclitus. Marine Biology 61: 243–246.
Acknowledgments
Randi Strutton, executive director of the Hoffler Creek Wildlife Foundation, generously provided access to the Hoffler Creek system. Field assistance was provided by John Agee, Kassi Avent, Erica Banikas, Isaac No, Abigail Thomas, and Nicole Voyles. Funding was provided by Christopher Newport University. This manuscript was greatly improved by comments from Richard Osman and three anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Richard W. Osman
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, J.S. Size-Selective Foraging of Adult Mummichogs, Fundulus heteroclitus, in Intertidal and Subtidal Habitats. Estuaries and Coasts 38, 1535–1544 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9913-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9913-3