Skip to main content
Log in

Habitat use and movement of the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) in a restored salt marsh

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, is one of the most abundant macrofaunal components of salt marsh ecosystems along the east coast of the United States. During April–November 1998, we determined the habitat use and movement patterns of young-of-the-year (YOY) and adult mummichogs in a restored marsh, formerly a salt hay farm, and an adjacent creek in order to expand our understanding of the ecology of the species and evaluate the success of the restoration. Four major fish habitat types (large first-order natural creek, second-order created creek, linear drainage ditch, and marsh surface) were identified within the study site. Patterns of relative abundance and mark and recapture using coded wire tags were used to determine the habitat use, tidal movements, home range, and site fidelity of the species within these habitat types. A total of 14,784 fish, ranging from 20–100 mm SL, were captured with wire mesh traps and tagged, and 1,521 (10.3%) fish were recaptured. A variety of gears were used to attempt to recapture fish across all habitat types, including wire mesh traps, push nets, and otter trawls. Based on abundance and recaptures of tagged fish, the YOY and adults primarily used the shallow subtidal and intertidal areas of the created creek, the intertidal drainage ditches, and the marsh surface of the restored marsh but not the larger, first-order natural creek. At low tide, large numbers were found in the subtidal areas of the created creek; these then moved onto the marsh surface on the flooding tide. Elevation, and thus hydroperiod, appeared to influence the microscale use of the marsh surface. We estimated the home range of adults and large YOY (20–100 mm SL) to be 15 ha at high tide, which was much larger than previously quantified. There was strong site fidelity to the created creek at low tide. The habitat use and movement patterns of the mummichog appeared similar to that reported for natural marshes. Coupled with the results of other studies on the feeding, growth, and production of this species in this restoreh, the species appeared to have responded well to the restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Able, K. W. 1999. Measures of juvenile fish habitat quality: Examples from a National Estuarine Research Reserve, p. 134–147.In L. R. Benaka (ed.) Fish Habitat: Essential Fish Habitat and Rehabilitation. American fisheries society, Symposium 22, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Able, K. W. andM. P. Fahay. 1998. The First Year in the Life of Estuarine Fishes in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W. andS. M. Hagan. 2000. Effects of common reed (Phragmites australis) invasion on marsh surface macrofauna: Response of fishes and decapod crustaceans.Estuaries 23:633–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W. andS. M. Hagan. 2003. The impact of common reed,Phragmites australis, on essential fish habitat: Influence on reproduction, embryological development and larval abundance of mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus)Estuaries 26:40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W. andD. Hata. 1984. Reproductive behavior in theFundulus heteroclitus-F, grandis complex.Copeia 1984:820–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W., D. M. Nemerson, P. R. Light, andR. O. Bush. 2000. Initial response of fishes to marsh restoration at a former salt hay farm bordering Delaware Bay, p. 749–773.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger (eds.), Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, Jr.,E. L. andJ. M. Dean. 1980. The abundance of estuarine larval and juvenile fish in a South Carolina intertidal creek.Estuaries 3:89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butner, A. andB. H. Brattstrom. 1960. Local movements inMenidia andFundulus.Copeia 1960:139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, J. D. 1999. Movements and growth of the sheepshead minnow,Cyprinodon variegatus, in a restored salt marsh. Master's Thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, L. A. 1993. Nutrient and energy transport between estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems by fish migration.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, P. M. 1997. Habitat use patterns of the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, in New England. I. Intramarsh variation.Estuaries 20:618–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R. T. 1986. The role ofFundulus heteroclitus in salt marsh trophic dynamics.American Zoologist 26:259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R. T. 1997. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton.Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 35:163–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R. T. andA. H. Craig. 2001. Efficacy of minnow traps for sampling mummichogs in tidal marshes.Estuaries 24:884–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R. T. andS. L. Wagner. 1994. Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation.Marine Ecology Progress Series 106:227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotrich, V. A. 1975. Summer home range and movements ofFundulus heteroclitus (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae) in a tidal creek.Ecology 56:191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, M. T., B. R. Friedman, D. J. Dunning, andQ. E. Ross. 1990. Magnetic tag detection efficiency for Hudson River striped bass.American Fisheries Society Symposium 7:267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, C. C. andW. E. Odum. 1988. Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage.Ecology 69: 1341–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemerson, D. M. 2001. Trophic dynamics and habitat ecology of the dominant fish of Delaware Bay (USA) marsh creeks. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S. W. andC. A. Oviatt. 1973. Ecology of a New England salt marsh.Ecological Monographs 43:463–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Service Electric & Gas Co. 1999a. Public Service Electric and Gas Company Detrital Production Monitoring. Publication 99030. PSE&G Estuary Enhancement Program, Newark, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Service Electric & Gas Co. 1999b. Public Service Electric and Gas Permit Renewal Application NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005622. Exhibit. G-3-9. March 4, 1999. PSE&G Estuary Enhancement Program, Newark, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H. 1983. Animal movements: An optimal foraging approach.In I. R. Swingland and P. J. Greenwood (eds.), The Ecology of Animal Movement. Claredon Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. T., W. A. Niering, andR. S. Warren. 1984. Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction.Environmental Management 8:141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. 1995. Hydroperiod and its influence on nekton use of the salt marsh: A pulsing ecosystem.Estuaries 18:579–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P., C. C. McIvor, andW. E. Odum. 1988. Intertidal rivulets and creekbanks: Corridors between tidal creeks and marshes.Marine Ecology Progress Series 47:303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebold, K. R. 1992. From Marsh to Farm: The Transformation of Coastal New Jersey. New Jersey Coastal Heritage Trail. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J. 1995. Processes regulating habitat use by salt marsh nekton in a southern New Jersey estuary. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., G. Taghon, andK. W. Able. 2000. Trophic linkages in marshes: Ontogenetic changes in diet for young-of-the-year mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, p. 221–237.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger (eds.), Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. andF. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. W. andK. W. Able. 1984. Composition and distribution of larval fishes in New Jersey high marshes.Estuaries 7:434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. W., K. W. Able, andJ. K. Shisler. 1986. Fish species composition in New Jersey salt marshes: Effects of marsh alterations for mosquito control.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 115:269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teal, J. M. 1962. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia.Ecology 43:614–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, S. L. H. 1999. Movement and population dynamics of the mummichog, Fundulus heteroditus, in a restored salt marsh. Master's Thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, S. L. H. andK. W. Able. 2003. Growth and production of mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) in a restored marsh.Estuaries 26:51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative Analysis of Movement: Measuring and Modelling Population Redistribution in Animals and Plants. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupper, M. andK. W. Able. 2000. Movements and food habits of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Delaware Bay (USA) salt marshes: Comparison of a restored and a reference marsh.Marine Biology 137:1049–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, M. J., J. T. Hill, andD. H. Lucas. 1997. An accurate and efficient method for reading sequentially coded wire tags aided by a PC-based data capture program.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:446–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiela, I., J. E. Wright, J. M. Teal, andS. B. Volkmann. 1977. Growth, production and energy transformations in the salt marsh killifishFundulus heteroclitus.Marine Biology 40:135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. P., J. H. Balletto, J. M. Teal, andD. E. Ludwig. 1997. Success criteria and adaptive management for a largescale wetland restoration project.Wetlands Ecology and Management 4:111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, S. B. andV. A. Lotrich. 1982. The importance of an infrequently flooded intertidal marsh surface as an energy source for the mummichogFundulus heteroclitus: An experimental approach.Marine Biology 66:307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winker, K., J. H. Rappole, andM. A. Ramos. 1995. The use of movement data as an assay of habitat quality.Oecologia 101: 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worton, B. J. 1987. A review of models of home range for animal movement.Ecological Modelling 38:277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 1996. Ecological issues in wetland mitigation: An introduction to the forum.Ecological Applications 6:33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 2001. Handbook for Restoring Tidal Wetlands. CRC Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. andR. Lindig-Cisneros. 2000. Functional equivalency of restored and natural salt marshes, p. 565–582.In M. P. Weinstein and D. A. Kreeger (eds.), Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Able.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teo, S.L.H., Able, K.W. Habitat use and movement of the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) in a restored salt marsh. Estuaries 26, 720–730 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02711983

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02711983

Keywords

Navigation