Abstract
How Study Design Influences the Ranking of Medicinal Plant Importance: A Case Study from Ghana, West Africa. Indices that rank medicinal plants by their cultural importance are valuable tools both for developing conservation priorities and locating effective medicinal compounds. Previous studies have compared different indices, focusing on the formulae used to construct them. The final cultural importance ranking can also be affected by other aspects of the research methods, such as selection of informants and design of the data collection protocol. We assess the influence of these different methodological choices by comparing rankings of medicinal plants developed with ethnobotanical data collected in five rural villages in Ghana in 2006. We compare six indices of importance, five that are commonly used and one newly developed based on responses from different sub-samples of our informants. Overall and within each sub-sample, we find little difference in plant rankings suggested by indices constructed with different formulae. Likewise, we find few differences in rankings based on different aggregations of use values. The more significantly influential methodological choices seem to be whether or not to prompt informants by mentioning specific illnesses, and which informants to interview. Specifically, we confirm the common belief that older respondents list different medicinal plant species than younger generations, and that men and women cite different medicinal species. In sum, our findings suggest that conservation priorities are likely to be relatively robust to the particular index and use categories employed to rank plant importance, but sample selection and elicitation methods may significantly influence results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Abbiw, D. 1990. Useful plants of Ghana : West African uses of wild and cultivated plants. IT Publications, Kew Royal Botanic Gardens, London.
Albuquerque, U. P., R. F. P. Lucena, J. M. Monteiro, A. T. N. Florentino, and C. B. R. Almedia. 2006. Evaluating two quantitative ethnobotanical techniques. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 4:51–60.
Amiguet, V. T., J. T. Arnason, et al. 2005. A consensus ethnobotany of the Q’eqchi’ Maya of Southern Belize. Economic Botany 59(1):29–42.
Ayensu, E. 1978. Medicinal plants of West Africa. Reference Publications, Inc., Algonac, Michigan.
———, A. Adu, and E. Barnes. 1996. Ghana: Biodiversity and tropical forestry assessment. Prepared for USAID Contract P10/T641-0110-3-50035 by Edward S. Ayensu Associates Limited.
Begossi, A., N. Hanazaki, and J. Y. Tamashiro. 2002. Medicinal plants in the Atlantic Forest (Brasil): Knowledge, use and conservation. Human Ecology 30(3):281–299.
Bennett, B. C. and G. T. Prance. 2000. Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopeia of northern South America. Economic Botany 54:90–102.
Bonet, M. A. and J. Vallès. 2003. Pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the Montseny Biosphere Reserve (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula): General results and new or rarely reported medicinal plants. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 55(2):259–270.
Caldwell, K. I. 2007. Assigning medicinal plant value and estimating traditional environmental knowledge in Ghana, Africa, using ethnobotanical measures. Master’s thesis, North Carolina State University. http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/handle/1840.16/771.
Case, R. J., G. F. Pauli, and D. D. Soejarto. 2005. Factors in maintaining indigenous knowledge among ethnic communities of Manus Island. Economic Botany 59(4):356–365.
Gausset, Q. 2004. Ranking local tree needs and priorities through an interdisciplinary action research approach. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 3.
Gomez-Beloz, A. 2002. Plant use knowledge of the Winikina Warao: The case for questionnaires in ethnobotany. Economic Botany 56(3):231–241.
Hanazaki, N., J. Y. Tamashiro, H. F. Leitao-Filho, and A. Begossi. 2000. Diversity of plant uses in two Caiçara communities from the Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:597–615.
Hawthorne, W. 1990. Field guide to the forest trees of Ghana. Overseas Development Agency, London, U.K.
Heinrich, M., A. Ankli, et al. 1998. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Social Science and Medicine 47(11):1859–1871.
Hoffman, B. and T. Gallaher. 2007. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Research and Application. 5:201–218.
Iwu, M. M. 1993. Handbook of African medicinal plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Johns, T., J. O. Kokwaro, and E. K. Kimanani. 1990. Herbal remedies of the Luo of Siaya District, Kenya: Establishing quantitative criteria for consensus. Economic Botany 44(3):369–381.
Kala, C. P., N. A. Farooquee, and U. Dhar. 2004. Prioritization of medicinal plants on the basis of available knowledge, existing practices and use value status in Uttaranchal, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:453–469.
Kpordugbe, P. 2000. Small scale enterprise development Project Gbledi Traditional Area, Final report. Unpublished. Report for the Afadjato Community Forest Conservation Project, January 2000.
Kremen, C., I. Raymond, and K. Lance. 1998. An interdisciplinary tool for monitoring conservation impacts in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 12(3):549–563.
Kristensen, M. and A. M. Lykke. 2003. Informant-based valuation of use and conservation preferences of Savanna trees in Burkina Faso. Economic Botany 57(2):203–217.
Kvist, L. P., M. Andersen, M. Hesselsøe, and J. K. Vanclay. 1995. Estimating use-values and relative importance of Amazonian flood plain trees and forests to local inhabitants. Commonwealth Forestry Review 74(4):293–300.
La Torre-Cuadros, M. A. and G. M. Islebe. 2003. Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in southeastern Mexico: A case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:2455–2476.
Lykke, A. M., M. K. Kristensen, and S. Ganaba. 2004. Valuation of local use and dynamics of 56 woody species in the Sahel. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1961–1990.
Martinéz, G. J., A. M. Planchuelo, E. Fuentes, and M. Ojeda. 2006. A numeric index to establish conservation priorities for medicinal plants in the Paravachasca Valley, Córdoba, Argentina. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:2457–2475.
Owusu E. H. 2001. Community-based conservation in Ghana: The potential of the Afadjato and Agumatsa Range for ecotourism. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent at Canterbury, Kent, U.K.
Pardo-de-Santayana, M. 2003. Las plantas en la cultura tradicional de la Antigua Merindad de Campoo. Ph.D. thesis, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Phillips, O. and A. H. Gentry. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47:15–32.
——— and ———. 1993b. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47:33–43.
———, ———, C. Reynel, P. Wilkin, and C. Galvez-Durand. 1994. Quantitative ethnobotany and Amazonian conservation. Conservation Biology 8:255–248.
The Plant List. 2013. www.theplantlist.org (July 2015).
Prance, G. T., W. Balée, B. M. Boom, and R. L. Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1(4):296–310.
Reyes-García, V., V. Vadez, E. Byron, L. Apaza, W. R. Leonard, E. Perez, and D. Wilkie. 2005. Market economy and the loss of folk knowledge of plant uses: Estimates from the Tsimane’ of the Bolivian Amazon. Current Anthropology 46:651–656.
———, T. Huanca, V. Vadez, W. Leonard, and D. Wilkie. 2006. Cultural, practical, and economic value of wild plants: A quantitative study in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Botany 60(1):62–74.
Rossato, S. C., H. Leitao Filho, and A. Begossi. 1999. Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Economic Botany 53:387–395.
Silva, V. A., L. H. C. Andrade, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2006. Revising the cultural significance index: The case of the Fulni-ô in northeastern Brazil. Field Methods 18:98–108.
Swaine, M. D., P. Ekpe, F. Seku, and M. Abu-Juam. 1999. Vegetation survey of the Mt. Afadjato Community Forest Conservation Project. Unpublished. Report prepared for the Ghana Wildlife Society, December 1999.
Tardío, J. and M. Pardo-de-Santayana. 2008. Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Economic Botany 62(1):24–39.
Tettey, R., E. Ekpe, and E. Owusu. 2005. Unpublished data collected on non-timber forest products in the Afadjato area.
Trotter, R. T. and M. H. Logan. 1986. Informant consensus: A new approach for identifying potentially effective medicinal plants. In: Plants in indigenous medicine and diet, ed. N. L. Etkin, 91–112. Bedford Hill, New York: Redgrave Publishing Company.
Voeks, R. A. and A. Leony. 2004. Forgetting the forest: Assessing medicinal plant erosion in Eastern Brazil. Economic Botany 58(Supplement):S284–S306.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted in collaboration with the Ghana Wildlife Society, including director Dr. Eramus Owusu, former site director Dr. Edem Ekpe, site director Reuben Ottou, researcher Rebecca Tettey, and chief Togbe Adabra. Local forest guides and herbalists were invaluable, serving as interpreters and providing expert knowledge of the local plants (David Logotse, Patrick Amexo, Amevor, Marcel, William, Johnson, and Issac). A special thanks to the residents of the five surveyed villages, who contributed their knowledge and experiences. Dr. Fikret Isik of North Carolina State University also provided assistance with the statistical analyses presented in this report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
1Received (April 2015); accepted (5 October 2015); published online_______.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dudney, K., Warren, S., Sills, E. et al. How Study Design Influences the Ranking of Medicinal Plant Importance: A Case Study from Ghana, West Africa. Econ Bot 69, 306–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9322-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9322-y