Skip to main content
Log in

Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil)

Etnobotânica de Caiçaras da Mata Atlântica, Brasil

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Caiçaras are inhabitants of the Atlantic Forest coast in SE Brazil. We studied the uses of plants by five Caiçara communities and compared medicinal plant citations by informants in coastal and island communities. We use diversity indices to evaluate the use of plants and to compare communities. There is a high diversity of plants used in the Atlantic Forest coasts: we found 276 species used for food, medicine and construction. Caiçaras rely on folk medicine, and medicinal plants were especially cited in interviews. Following predictions of island biogeography theory, we found a lower diversity of medicinal plants cited in islands compared to continental communities.

Resumen

OS caiçaras são habitantes da costa da Mata Atlântica no SE do Brasil. Estudamos o uso de plantas em cinco comunidades caiçaras e comparamos as citações de plantas medicinais entre as comunidades da costa e das ilhas. Usamos indices de diversidade para comparar as comunidades. Há uma alta diversidade de plantas usadas na costa da Mata Atlântica: encontramos 276 plantas usadas para alimento, medicina e construçāo. Os caiçaras dependem da medicina tradicional, e plantas medicinais foram especialmente citadas nos entrevistas. Seguindo as expectativas da teoria de biogeografia de ilhas, encontramos uma diversidade menor de plantas medicinais citadas nas ilhas comparado às comunidades continentais.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Aldunate, C., J. J. Armesto, V. Castro, and C. Villagran. 1983. Ethnobotany of prealtiplanic community in the Andes of northern Chile. Economic Botany 37:120–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. F. 1986. Ethnobotany of Hill tribes of Northern Tailand. I. Medicinal plants of Akha. Economic Botany 40:38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée, W. 1987. A etnobotanica quantitativa dos índios Tembé (Rio Gurupi, Pará). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Sèrie Bot 3:29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A. 1992. Food taboos at Búzios Island (SE Brazil): their significance and relation to folk medicine. Journal of Ethnobiology 12:117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Fishing spots and sea tenure: incipient forms of local management in Atlantic Forest coastal communities. Human Ecology 23:387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: diversity indices. Economic Botany 50: 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998a. Cultural and ecological resilience among caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest and caboclos of the Amazon, Brazil. Pages 129–157in C. Folke and F. Berkes, eds., Linking social and cultural systems for resilience. Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998b. Extractive reserves in the Brazilian Amazon: an example to be followed in the Atlantic Forest? Ciência e Cultura 50:24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A., H. F. Leitão-Filho, and P. J. Richerson. 1993. Plants uses in a Brazil coastal fishing community (Búzios Island). Journal of Ethnobiology 13:233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, B. C. 1992. Plants and people of the Amazonian rainforests. Bioscience 42:599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boom, B. M. 1990. Useful plants of Panare Indians of Venezuela Guayama. Advances in Economic Botany 8:57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavero, E. L., and M. E. A. Roces. 1988. Ethnobotany in a tropical-humid region: the home gardens of Balzapote, Vera Cruz, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 8:45–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabetsky, E. 1988. Introdution to ethnopharmacology. Pages 109–110in D. A. Posey and W. L. Overal, eds., Ethnobiology: implications and applications. Museu Paraense Emilio GoeldiBelém, Pará, Vol 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, N. R. and D. D. Soejarto. 1991. Global importance of medicinal plants. Pages 22–51in O. Akerele, ed., The conservation of medicinal plants. Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, G. M., H. F. Leitão-Filho, and A. Begossi. 1993. Ethnobotany of Atlantic forest coastal communities diversity of uses in Gamboa (Itacuruçá Island, Brazil). Human Ecology 21:419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, —,and —. 1997. Ethnobotany of Atlantic Forest communities. II. Diversity of plants uses at Sepetiba Bay (SE-Brazil). Human Ecology 25:353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., F. Berkes and C. Folke. 1993. Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22:151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R. 1992. Agroecology in the tropics: achieving a balance between land use and preservation. Environmental Management 16:681–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly, C. A., H. F. Leitão-Filho, and S. M. Silva. 1991. The Floristic Heritage. Pages 97-125in I. G. Câmara, ed., Atlantic Rain Forest, Ed. Index/SOS Mata Atlântica, São Paulo.

  • Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological Methodology. Harper and Row Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitão-Filho, H. F. 1982. Aspectos taxonômicos das florestas do Estado de São Paulo. Silviculture em São Paulo 16:197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical Ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., and I. A. Bowles. 1993. The GEF and biodiversity conservation: lessons to date and recommendation for future action. Conservation International Policy Paper 1:2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O., A. H. Gentry, C. Reynel, P. Wilkin, and C. B. Gálvez-Durand. 1994. Quantitative ethnobotany and Amazonian conservation. Conservation Biology 8:225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., W. Balée, B. M. Boom, and R. L. Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conservation Biology 1:296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, M. J. 1988. The outlook for new agricultural and industrial products from the tropics. Pages 106–115in E. O. Wilson, ed., Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossato, S. C. 1996. Utilização de plantas por populações do litoral norte do estado de São Paulo. Master’s thesis, University of São Paulo.

  • Silva, A. F., and H. F. Leitão-Filho. 1982. Composição florística e estrutura de um trecho de Mata Atlântica de encosta no município de Ubatuba (São Paulo, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Botânica 5:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, V. M., A. I. Batis, R. Bacerra, E. Martinez, and C. Ramos. 1995. La selva util: etnobotánica cuantitativa de los grapos indígenas del trópico húmedo de México. Interciência 20:177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vianna, L. P., and M. C. Brito. 1992. Vila de Picinguaba: o caso de uma comunidade caiçara no interior de uma área protegida. Pages 1067–1073in Anais do 2. Congresso Nacional de Essências Nativas, São Paulo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1992. The diversity of life. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alpina Begossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossato, S.C., De LeitãO-Filho, H.F. & Begossi, A. Ethnobotany of caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest coast (Brazil). Econ Bot 53, 387–395 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866716

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866716

Key Words

Navigation