Skip to main content
Log in

Lactobacillus isolates from weaned piglets’ mucosa with inhibitory activity against common porcine pathogens

  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twelve lactobacilli isolates from mucosa of 3–5-week-old weaned pigs were found to exert good antimicrobial activity against common porcine pathogens (S. aureus, B. cereus, E. coli, C. perfringens). Two of them produced in addition to lactic acid also considerable amounts of acetic acid, and 6 of them produced hydrogen peroxide and metabolites other than organic acids. Isolates 4/26 and 2/25 (identified as L. crispatus or L. amylovorus) were inhibitory against most strains of S. aureus, B. cereus and E. coli, and especially the strain 4/26 survived well in simulated gastric and intestinal juice. Diarrhea-causing E. coli O8K88H9 Ent+ was successfully inhibited by the growing culture as well as by the catalase-treated and neutralized supernatant of L. reuteri 12/26. Mucin degradation and multiple resistance to antibiotics were not observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ETEC:

enterotoxigenic E. coli

LAB:

lactic acid bacteria

MRS:

de Man-Rogosa-Sharp (agar)

GI:

gastrointestinal

MHA:

Mueller-Hinton agar

VFAs:

volatile fatty acids

HGM:

hog gastric mucin

References

  • Ammor M.S., Florez A.B., Mayo B.: Antibiotic resistance in non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol.24, 559–570 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anadón A., Martinez-Larrañaga M.R., Martinez M.A.: Probiotics for animal nutrition in the European Union. Regulation and safety assessment. Regul.Toxicol.Pharmacol.45, 91–95 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belicová A., Križková L., Krajčovič J., Jurkovič D., Sojka M., Ebringer L., Dušinský R.: Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus species isolated from Slovak Bryndza cheese. Folia Microbiol.52, 115–119 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung T.C., Axelsson L., Lindgren S.E., Dobrogosz W.J.: In vitro studies on reuterin synthesis by Lactobacillus reuteri. Microb. Ecol.Health Dis.2, 137–144 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Community Register of Feed Additives Pursuant to Regulation (EC) no. 1831/2003, appendixes 3 & 4; Annex: List of additives (2003); http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/animalnutrition/feedadditives/comm_register_feed_additives_1831-03.pdf .

  • Coppola R., Succi M., Tremonte P., Reale A., Salzano G., Sorrentino E.: Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. Lait85, 193–204 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen M., Wind A.: Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents. Internat.J.Food Microbiol.82, 1–11 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vuyst L., Avonts L., Neysens P., Hoste B., Vancanneyt M., Swings J., Callewaert R.: The lactobin A and amylovorin L471 encoding genes are identical, and their distribution seems to be restricted to the species Lactobacillus amylovorus that is of interest for cereal fermentations. Internat.J.Food Microbiol.90, 93–106 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado S., Flórez A.B., Mayo B.: Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species from the human gastrointestinal tract. Curr.Microbiol.50, 202–207 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: Opinion of the FEEDAP Panel on the updating of the criteria used in the assessment of bacteria for resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance. EFSA J.223, 1–12 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández M.F., Boris S., Barbés C.: Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J.Appl. Microbiol.94, 449–455 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández M.F., Boris S., Barbés C.: Safety evaluation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis UO 004, a probiotic bacterium. Res.Microbiol.156, 154–160 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gänzle M.G., Höltzel A., Walter J., Jung G., Hammes W.P.: Characterization of reutericyclin produced by Lactobacillus reuteri LTH 2584. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.66, 4325–4333 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers D., Huys G., Swings J.: In vitro conjugal transfer of tetracycline resistance from Lactobacillus isolates to other Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol.Lett.225, 125–130 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson D.J.: Postweaning Escherichia coli diarrhea in pigs, pp. 171–791 in C.L Gyles (Ed.): Escherichia coli in Domestic Animals and Humans. CAB International, Wallingford 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdeman L.V., Cato E.P., Moore W.E.C.: Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 4th ed. VPI, Blacksburg, Virginia 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins L.C., Boulding E.T.: Mucin degradation in human colon ecosystems. J.Clin.Invest.67, 163–172 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel A., Hertel C., Holzapfel W.H., Franz C.M.A.P.: Antibiotic resistances of starter and probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.73, 730–739 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi N., Yamazaki S.: Probiotics and safety. Am.J.Clin.Nutr.73, 465–470 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen C.N., Nielsen V.R., Hayford A.E., Moller P.L., Michaelsen K.F., Paerregaard A., Sandstrom B., Tvede M., Jakobsen M.: Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.65, 4949–4956 (1999).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen L., Wilcks A., Hammer K., Huys G., Gevers D., Andersen S.R.: Horizontal transfer of tet(M) and erm(B) resistance plasmids from food strains of Lactobacillus plantarum to Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2 in the gastrointestinal tract of gnotobiotic rats. FEMS Microbiol.Ecol.59, 158–166 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L.Z., Marquardt R.R., Baidoo S.K.: Inhibition of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88, K99 and 987P by the Lactobacillus isolates from porcine intestine. J.Sci.Food Agric.80, 619–624 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson J.L., Phelps C.F., Cummins C.S., London J., Gasser F.: Taxonomy of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group. Internat.J.Syst. Bacteriol. 30, 53–68 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klare I., Konstabel C., Müller-Bertling S., Reissbrodt R., Huys G., Vancanneyt M., Swings J., Goossens H., Witte W.: Evaluation of new broth media for microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing of lactobacilli, pediococci, lactococci, and bifidobacteria. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.71, 8982–8986 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koninkx J.F.J.G., Malago J.J.: The protective potency of probiotic bacteria and their microbial products against enteric infections — review. Folia Microbiol.53, 189–194 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinov S.R., Awati A., Smidt H., Williams B.A., Akkermans A.D.L., De Vos W.M.: Specific response of a novel and abundant Lactobacillus amylovorus-like phylotype to dietary prebiotics in the guts of weaning piglets. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.70, 3821–3830 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauková A., Marciňáková M., Strompfová V., Ouwehand A.C.: Probiotic potential of enterococci isolated from canine feed. Folia Microbiol.53, 84–588 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leser T.D., Amenuvor J.Z., Jensen T.K., Lindecrona R.H., Boye M., Møller K.: Culture-independent analysis of gut bacteria: the pig gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Appl.Environ.Microbiol.68, 673–690 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lomáková I., Petrásková P., Šterzl I., Prokešová L.: Immunomodulatory effects of Bacillus firmus on mouse peritoneal cells in vitro. Folia Microbiol.51, 243–248 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marciňáková M., Simonová M., Strompfová V., Lauková A.: Oral application of Enterococcus faecium strain EE3 in healthy dogs. Folia Microbiol.51, 239–242 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matijašić B.B., Stojković S., Rogelj I.: Survival and in vivo adhesion of human isolates Lactobacillus gasseri LF221 and K7 in weaned piglets and their effects on coliforms, clostridia and lactobacilli viable counts in feces and mucosa. J.Dairy Res.73, 417–422 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuoka T.: The human gastrointestinal tract, pp. 69–11 in B.J.B. Wood (Ed.): The Lactic Acid Bacteria in Health and Disease. Elsevier Applied Science, London 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountzouris K.C.: Assessment of the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in swine nutrition: a review. Food Sci.Technol. Bull., Functional Foods3, 51–71 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouwehand A., Salminen A.C., Isolauri E.: Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek82, 279–289 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rigon-Zimmer K., Mullié C., Tir-Touil-Meddah A., Buisson P., Léké L., Canarelli J.P.: Impact of colostomy on intestinal microflora and bacterial translocation in young rats fed with heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Folia Microbiol.53, 89–94 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj I., Matijašić B.B.: Lactobacillus gasseri LF221 and K7 — from isolation to application. Biologia61, 761–769 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salminen S., Von Wright A., Morelli L., Marteau P., Brassart D., De Vos W.M., Fonden R., Saxelin M., Collins K., Mogensen G., Birkeland S.E., Mattila-Sandholm T.: Demonstration of safety of probiotics — a review. Internat.J.Food Microbiol.44, 93–106 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tagg J.R., Dajani A.S., Wannamaker L.W.: Bacteriocins of Gram-positive bacteria. Bacteriol.Rev.40, 722–756 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temmerman R., Pot B., Huys G., Swings J.: Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products. Internat.J.Food Microbiol.81, 1–10 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trebichavský I., Šplíchal I.: Probiotics manipulate host cytokine response and induce antimicrobial peptides. Folia Microbiol.51, 507–510 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walencka E., Różalska S., Sadowska B., Różalska B.: The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived surfactants on staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation. Folia Microbiol.53, 61–66 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walter J.: The microecology of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract, pp. 51–82 in G.W. Tannock (Ed.): Probiotics & Prebiotics: Scientific Aspects. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward L., Brown J., Graham D.: Two methods for the genetic differentiation of Lactococcus lactis and cremoris based on differences in the 16S rRNA gene sequence. FEMS Microbiol.Lett.166, 15–21 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J.S., Gopal P.K., Gill H.S.: Potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN001), Lactobacillus acidophilus (HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis (HN019) do not degrade gatric mucin in vitro. Internat.J.Food Microbiol. 63, 81–90 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. B. Matijašić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hacin, B., Rogelj, I. & Matijašić, B.B. Lactobacillus isolates from weaned piglets’ mucosa with inhibitory activity against common porcine pathogens. Folia Microbiol 53, 569–576 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-008-0091-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-008-0091-1

Keywords

Navigation