Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Fiber Dimension and Its Distribution on the Properties of Lyocell and Ramie Fibers Reinforced Polylactide Composites

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The regenerated cellulose fiber (Lyocell) and natural cellulose fiber (ramie) with different initial lengths were used to reinforce polylactide (PLA) by melt compounding and injection molding. The fiber dimension and its distribution in composites after injection molding were analyzed by high-resolution Fiber Quality Analyzer (FQA). Moreover, the contents of small fibers with length < 0.2 mm were also provided by FQA. Then the influences of fiber dimension and its distribution on the mechanical properties of the composites were investigated. The results showed that fiber length was reduced during compounding and injection molding processes, and the longer the initial fiber length, the more severe the length declined. Compared with ramie fiber, Lyocell fiber showed a longer fiber length, smaller diameter and narrower width distribution in composite after injection molding. Additionally, the content of small fiber played an important role in the analysis of the relation between the fiber dimension and mechanical properties of composites owing to its smaller aspect ratio. The different mechanical characteristics of the PLA composites were attributed predominantly to the fiber aspect ratio and the small fiber content. By comparison, Lyocell fiber exhibited better reinforcement for PLA due to the higher aspect ratio and lower small fiber content. The tensile strength, tensile modulus and impact strength of Lyocell/PLA composite were increased by 8.61 %, 75.43 % and 26.9 %, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. C. Seavey, I. Ghosh, R. M. Davis, and W. G. Glasser, Cellulose, 8, 149 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Faruk, A. K. Bledzki, H. P. Fink, and M. Sain, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 299, 9 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Oksman, M. Skrifvars, and J. F. Selin, Compos. Sci. Technol., 63, 1317 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. K. Pandey, S. H. Ahn, C. S. Lee, A. K. Mohanty, and M. Misra, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 295, 975 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Gurunathan, S. Mohanty, and S. K. Nayak, Compos. Part A, 77, 1 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kamel, Express Polym. Lett., 1, 546 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. V. Joshi, L. T. Drzal, A. K. Mohanty, and S. Arora, Compos. Part A, 35, 371 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. H. Lee and S. Wang, Compos. Part A, 37, 80 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Bayerl, M. Geith, A. A. Somashekar, and D. Bhattacharyya, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 96, 18 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Plackett, T. L. Andersen, W. B. Pedersen, and L. Nielsen, Compos. Sci. Technol., 63, 1287 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Baghaei, M. Skrifvars, M. Rissanen, and S. K. Ramamoorthy, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 131, 40534 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Y. Choi and J. S. Lee, Fiber. Polym., 13, 217 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Piekarska, E. Piorkowska, N. Krasnikova, and P. Kulpinski, Polym. Compos., 35, 747 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. R. Nurul Fazita, K. Jayaraman, D. Bhattacharyya, M. K. Mohamad Haafiz, C. K. Saurabh, M. H. Hussin, and A. Khalil, Materials, 9, 435 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. M. K. Gupta and R. K. Srivastava, Polym.-Plast. Technol., 55, 626 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Xu, C. Y. Liu, C. Chen, B. S. Hsiao, G. J. Zhong, and Z. M. Li, Biopolymers, 97, 825 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. X. Chen, J. Ren, N. Zhang, S. Gu, and J. Li, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp., 34, 28 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Graupner, A. S. Herrmann, and J. Müssig, Compos. Part A, 40, 810 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Graupner, G. Ziegmann, F. Wilde, F. Bechmann, and J. Müssig, Compos. Part A, 81, 158 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. A. Gunning, L. M. Geever, J. A. Killion, J. G. Lyons, and C. L. Higginbotham, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp., 33, 648 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G. Robertson, J. Olson, P. Allen, B. Chan, and R. Seth, Tappi J., 82, 93 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. A. Olson, A. G. Robertson, D. T. Finnigan, and R. R. H. Turner, J. Pulp. Pap. Sci., 21, 367 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Ai and U. Tschirner, Bioresource Technol., 101, 215 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Bax and J. Müssig, Compos. Sci. Technol., 68, 1601 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Y. Fu and B. Lauke, Compos. Sci. Technol., 56, 1179 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. K. P. Mieck, T. Reussmann, and C. Hauspurg, Materialwiss. Werkst., 31, 169 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Lewin, “Handbook of Fiber Chemistry”, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Ganster and H. P. Fink, Cellulose, 13, 271 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (16ZR1401600); and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (16D110620).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huihui Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, M., Zhang, H., Liu, Z. et al. Effects of Fiber Dimension and Its Distribution on the Properties of Lyocell and Ramie Fibers Reinforced Polylactide Composites. Fibers Polym 20, 1726–1732 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-1171-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-1171-3

Keywords

Navigation