Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Estimation of Fiber Diameter of Nanofibrous Membranes by Image Analysis Methods

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The manual methods are often used for measurement of fiber diameter of electrospun membranes, however these methods are not suitable for online quality control. Although number of image analysis methods have been reported for automated measurement of fiber diameter, but there is no literature available regarding reliability, accuracy and simplicity of these measurements. In this study, the distance transform methods suggested by Pourdeyhimi and Ziabari, direct tracking method, DiameterJ software and Zhang method were compared for automated measurement of fiber diameter of electrospun nanofibrous membranes. From one way ANOVA, the difference between the results of fiber diameter was found highly significant. The mean and standard deviation of fiber diameter obtained in case of Ziabari method were extremely close to the results of manual method and also to the true values of the simulated image. Therefore, the more accurate estimation of fiber diameter was confirmed in case of Ziabari method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. M. Huang, Y. Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, Compos. Sci. Technol., 63, 2223 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. G. Xu and L. Yu, Text. Res. J., 67, 563 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Yan and M. Gevelber, J. Electrostat., 68, 458 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Stanger, N. Tucker, N. Buunk, and Y. B. Truong, Polym. Test., 40, 4 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. J. Schaub, S. J. Kirkpatrick, and R. J. Gilbert, Bionanoscience, 3, 329 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Pourdeyhimi and R. Dent, Text. Res. J., 69, 233 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Ziabari, V. Mottaghitalab, S. T. McGovern, and A. K. Haghi, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2, 597 (2007).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ziabari, V. Mottaghitalab, and A. K. Haghi, Brazilian J. Chem. Eng., 26, 53 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Chen, R. Wang, X. Zhang, and B. Yin, Procedia Eng., 15, 3516 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. M. Zhang, R. W. Wang, H. B. Wu, and B. Xu, J. Ind. Text., 43, 593 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ziabari, V. Mottaghitalab, S. T. McGovern, and A. K. Haghi, Chinese Phys. Lett., 25, 3071 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. A. Hotaling, K. Bharti, H. Kriel, and C. G. Simon, Biomaterials, 61, 327 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Bhargavi, Int. J. Innov. Res. Dev., 3, 234 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Wan, L. Yao, and B. Xu, J. Eng. Fiber. Fabr., 7, 114 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Pourdeyhimi, R. Ramanathan, and R. Dent, Text. Res. J., 66, 713 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. S. Abdel-Ghani and G. A. Davies, Chem. Eng. Sci., 40, 117 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smita Baheti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baheti, S., Tunak, M. Comparative Estimation of Fiber Diameter of Nanofibrous Membranes by Image Analysis Methods. Fibers Polym 19, 2612–2621 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8674-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8674-1

Keywords

Navigation