Abstract
Psychological injuries, like physical injuries, may occur within the workplace. If those injuries are reported to be a result of a triggering event in the workplace, then a workers’ compensation (WC) claim may be filed by the individual. State WC and the federal WC systems have laws and rules in place to address workplace psychological injury claims. However, because each State has its own WC State laws as does the federal WC system, there is no current standardization in defining either psychological injury or in defining disability. This is because each system has its own definitions. A few States allow workplace psychological injury claims. Some States do not accept WC psychological injury claims. The remaining States recognize workplace psychological injuries but with specific limitations. The federal WC system allows WC psychological injury claims. There are problematic issues that occur in the State and federal WC systems. These issues are utilizing outdated terminology, employing outdated diagnostic criteria, and allowing documentation submission and professional opinion that does not comport with current professional standards of care. In addition, the need for a definitive answer to address causation is not always possible to address with regard to psychological injury. These types of issues introduce imprecision into the determination of psychological injuries. To address these concerns, the American Medical Association developed the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment as a means to take a more scientific approach to the assessment of impairment. This stance was a move away from the poorly defined term, “disability”. The focus was on evaluating the individual’s functioning in terms of impairment. The AMA holds that this is a more objective method that provides a balance between clinical opinion and the utilization of a more scientific methodology that increased precision in the determination of psychological injury and purported impairment in functioning that may have resulted from the injury. The American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment are utilized by many States and the federal WC systems to assist in the evaluation of psychological impairment in functioning and in the WC claims process. Some States opt to use earlier editions of the Guides. Other States and the federal WC system require the usage of the most current edition of the Guides. A few States opt to forego the usage of the Guides altogether and develop State-specific guidelines. The complexities that arise within the WC systems as well as usage of the Guides to evaluate and assess psychological injury are explored as well as potential solutions to address the imprecision that occurs within the WC systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
§8105. Total disability and §8106. Partial disability. (2016). U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) - Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC) - Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/statutes/feca.htm#8105
Aas, I. M. (2011). Guidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Annals of General Psychiatry, 10(1), 2. doi:10.1186/1744-859x-10-2
Aas, I. M. (2014). Collecting information for rating global assessment of functioning (GAF): Sources of information and methods for information collection. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 10(4), 330–347.
Akobeng, A. K. (2007). Understanding diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Acta Paediatrica, 96(3), 338–341.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012). Mental health services in brief--2012 (AIHW). Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737423078
Baker, G. A., Taylor, J., & Hermann, B. (2009). How can cognitive status predispose to psychological impairment? Epilepsy & Behavior, 15(2), S31–S35. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.03.021
Baron, J. (2007). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barsky, A. J. (2002). Forgetting, fabricating, and telescoping. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162(9), 981. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.9.981
Baumeister, H., Hutter, N., Bengel, J., & Härter, M. (2011). Quality of life in medically ill persons with comorbid mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 80(5), 275–286.
Baune, B. T., Caniato, R. N., Arolt, V., & Berger, K. (2009). The effects of dysthymic disorder on health-related quality of life and disability days in persons with comorbid medical conditions in the general population. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78(3), 161–166.
Bender, M. (2016). Workers’ compensation index (12th ed.). CA: Matthew Bender.
Brigham, C. R., Genovese, E., & Uejo, C. (2008a). AMA guides sixth edition: New concepts, challenges, and opportunities. International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions, 45(1), 59–82. Retrieved from http://www.iaiabc.org/iaiabc/default.asp
Brigham, C. R., Uehlein, W. F., Uejo, C., & Dilbeck, L. (2008b). AMA guides sixth edition: Perceptions, myths, and insights. International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions, 45(2), 65–82. Retrieved from http://www.iaiabc.org/iaiabc/default.asp
Bruffaerts, R., Vilagut, G., Demyttenaere, K., Alonso, J., AlHamzawi, A., Andrade, L. H., … Kessler, R. C. (2012). Role of common mental and physical disorders in partial disability around the world. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200(6), 454–461.
Bruns, D., Mueller, K., & Warren, P. A. (2010). A review of evidence-based biopsychosocial laws governing the treatment of pain and injury. Psychological Injury and Law, 3(3), 169–181.
Bruns, D., Mueller, K., & Warren, P. A. (2012). Biopsychosocial law, health care reform, and the control of medical inflation in Colorado. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57(2), 81–97.
Burton, J. F., & Guo, X. (2015). Improving the interaction between the SSDI and workers’ compensation programs (10). Retrieved from Workers’ compensation Resources Research Report website: http://workerscompresources.com/
Carder, M., McNamee, R., Turner, S., Hodgson, J. T., Holland, F., & Agius, R. M. (2013). Time trends in the incidence of work-related mental ill-health and musculoskeletal disorders in the UK. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 70, 317–324. doi:10.1136/oemed-2012-100904
Carone, D. A., & Bush, S. S. (2013). Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering. New York: Springer.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Adler, D., … Rose, M. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5), S3–S11. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
Cocchiarella, L., Andersson, G., & American Medical Association. (2001a). Mental and behavioral disorders. In G. B. J. Andersson & L. Cocchiarella (Eds.), Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (5th ed., pp. 347–382). Chicago: American Medical Association.
Cocchiarella, L., Andersson, G., & American Medical Association. (2001b). Mental and behavioral disability. In G. B. J. Andersson & L. Cocchiarella (Eds.), Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (5th ed., pp. 357–372). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.
Colledge, A. L. (2013). Impairment rating, ambiguity, IAIABC system. In G. F. Gebhert & R. F. Schmidt (Eds.), Encyclopedia of pain (pp. 1590–1594). Berlin: Springer.
Colledge, A. L., & Kroh, G. (2013). Impairment rating, ambiguity. In G. F. Gebhert & R. F. Schmidt (Eds.), Encyclopedia of pain (pp. 966–969). Berlin: Springer.
Colledge, A., Hunter, B., Bunkall, L. D., & Holmes, E. B. (2009). Impairment rating ambiguity in the United States: The Utah impairment guides for calculating workers’ compensation impairments. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 24(Suppl 2), S232. doi:10.3346/jkms.2009.24.s2.s232
Correio, R. F. (2015). California: Rolda reloaded: A creative approach to the dual causation elements of the Rolda multi-level analysis [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/archive/2015/01/16/california-rolda-reloaded-a-creative-approach-to-the-dual-causation-elements-of-the-rolda-multi-level-analysis.aspx?Redirected=true
Denne, J., Kettner, G., & Ben-Shalom, Y. (2015). The role of the physician in the return-to-work process following disability onset (DOLQ121A21886/DOLU139435199). Retrieved from U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy website: http://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/pdf/RTW_Role%20of%20Physician_2015-03.pdf
Department of Labor. (1995). Part 2—Claims. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/compliance/DFECFolio/FECA-PT2.pdf
Department of Labor. (2007). Injury compensation for federal employees. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/compliance/DFECFolio/agencyhb.pdf
Department of Labor. (2016). United States Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/
Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC) CA-11 When Injured at Work Information Guide for Federal Employees. (n.d.). U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) - Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC) - Compliance - CA-11 When Injured at Work Information Guide for Federal Employees. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/compliance/ca-11.htm
Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC). (n.d.). U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) - Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC) - Federal employees’ compensation act. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/statutes/feca.htm
Escorpizo, R., & Stucki, G. (2013). Functioning and disability definitions. In G. F. Gebhert & R. F. Schmidt (Eds.), Encyclopedia of pain (pp. 1329–1335). Berlin: Springer.
Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (2012). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony. New York: Oxford University Press.
Faust, D., Grimm, P. W., Ahern, D. C., & Sokolik, M. (2010). The admissibility of behavioral science evidence in the courtroom: The translation of legal to scientific concepts and back. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 49–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091523
Flatten, M. (2013a). Disability can be easy street for federal bureaucrats (p. 3). Washington: Washington Examiner.
Flatten, M. (2013b). Experts say fraud rampant in federal worker disability program (p. 3). Washington: Washington Examiner.
Flatten, M. (2013c). Paralysis in congress keeps federal worker disability fraudsters cashing the checks (p. 3). Washington: Washington Examiner.
Forst, L., Friedman, L., & Chukwu, A. (2010). Reliability of the AMA Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52(12), 1201–1203.
Franzen, M. D. (2002). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3224-5
Garb, H. N. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 67–89.
Gatchel, R. J. (2013a). Disability assessment, psychological/psychiatric evaluation. In G. F. Gebhert & R. F. Schmidt (Eds.), Encyclopedia of pain (pp. 993–995). Berlin: Springer.
Gatchel, R. J. (2013b). The biopsychosocial model of chronic pain. In A. Dougall & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Clinical insights: Chronic pain (pp. 5–17). London: Future Medicine.
Gellman, M. D., & Turner, J. R. (2013). Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. New York: Springer.
Georgiopoulos, A. M. (2008). The DSM-IV-TR: A multiaxial system for psychiatric diagnosis. Massachusetts General Hospital Comprehensive Clinical Psychiatry, 205–214. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-04743-2.50019-6
Gholizadeh, S., Malcarne, V. L., & Schatman, M. E. (2015). Ethical quandaries for psychologists in workers’ compensation settings: The GAF gaffe. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(1), 64–81.
Gili, M., Comas, A., García-García, M., Monzón, S., Antoni, S., & Roca, M. (2010). Comorbidity between common mental disorders and chronic somatic diseases in primary care patients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 32(3), 240–245.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. W., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grant, B. L., & Robbins, D. B. (2003). Disability and workers’ compensation. In: Mental health and productivity in the workplace: A handbook for organizations and clinicians (pp. 347–368). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19–30.
Gunnarsson, K., Larsson, M., Persson Schill, H., & Josephson, M. (2014). Research note: Return to work in small enterprises. Small Enterprise Research, 21(2), 229–237.
Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Bieling, P. (2001). File review consultation in the adjudication of mental health and chronic pain disability claims. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(1), 52–63.
Hamm, R. M., Reiss, D. M., Paul, R. K., & Bursztajn, H. J. (2007). Knocking at the wrong door: Insured workers’ inadequate psychiatric care and workers’ compensation claims. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30(4–5), 416–426.
Harding, T. P. (2004). Psychiatric disability and clinical decision making: The impact of judgment error and bias. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(6), 707–729.
Heidel, S. H. (2003). Emotional crises in the workplace. In: Mental health and productivity in the workplace a handbook for organizations and clinicians (pp. 297–213). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., & Goldstein, A. M. (2009). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hinkka, K., Kuoppala, J., Väänänen-Tomppo, I., & Lamminpää, A. (2013). Psychosocial work factors and sick leave, occupational accident, and disability pension. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(2), 191–197.
Hofmann, B. (2016). Medicalization and overdiagnosis: Different but alike. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 19, 253–264.
Ivbijaro, G. (2014). EPA-1436—Primary care, long-term conditions and mental health co-morbidity: Resource implications. European Psychiatry, 29, 1. doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(14)78636-5
Iverson, G. L. (2007). Identifying exaggeration and malingering. Pain Practice, 7(2), 94–102.
Jeffery, T. P. (2013). First term: Americans collecting disability increased 1,385,418-now 1 for each full-time worker. Washington: CNS.
Kahn, J. P. (2013). Angst: Origins of anxiety and depression. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kahn, J. P., & Langlieb, A. M. (2003). Mental health and productivity in the workplace: A handbook for organizations and clinicians. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kertay, L., Eskay-Auerbach, M., & Hyman, M. (2016). AMA guides to navigating disability benefit systems: Essentials for the health care professional. Chicago: American Medical Association.
Kilgour, E., Kosny, A., Akkermans, A., & Collie, A. (2015). Procedural justice and the use of independent medical evaluations in workers’ compensation. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(2), 153–168.
Klein, D. N., & Depue, R. A. (n.d.). Inventory of psychological impairment. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t25033-000
Knauf, M. T., & Schultz, I. Z. (2016). Current conceptual models of return to work. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of return to work (pp. 27–51). New York: Springer.
Koch, W. J., Douglas, K. S., Nicholls, T. L., & O’Neill, M. L. (2005). Detecting exaggeration and malingering in psychological injury claims. In W. J. Koch, K. S. Douglas, T. L. Nicholls, & M. L. O’Neill (Eds.), Psychological injuries (pp. 76–112). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhnlein, J. (2008). Member report for the Iowa Task Force regarding the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, sixth edition. Retrieved from http://www.iowaworkcomp.gov/sites/authoring.iowadivisionofworkcomp.gov/files/kuhnleinreport.pdf
Kuoppala, J., Lamminpää, A., Väänänen-Tomppo, I., & Hinkka, K. (2011). Employee well-being and sick leave, occupational accident, and disability pension. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(6), 633–640.
Ladou, J. (2009). Federal employees’ compensation act. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 15(2), 180–194.
Larson, A., Larson, L. K., & Matthew Bender (Firm). (2016). Larson’s workers’ compensation law. New York: Matthew Bender.
Levitt, B. E. (2010). Quantifying mental and behavioral impairments in the context of catastrophic impairment analysis. Health Law in Canada, 31(2), 53–63. Retrieved from http://www.kaplanpsychologists.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/quantifyingimpairments.pdf
Lewandowski, L. J., Lovett, B. J., & Gordon, M. (2009). Measurement of symptom severity and impairment. In S. Goldstein & J. Naglieri (Eds.), Assessing impairment: From theory to practice (pp. 5–14). New York: Springer.
Linden, M., Baron, S., & Muschalla, B. (2010). Relationship between work-related attitudes, performance and capacities according to the ICF in patients with mental disorders. Psychopathology, 43(4), 262–267.
Little, M., & Edovald, T. (2012). Return on investment: The evaluation of costs and benefits of evidence-based programs. Psychosocial Intervention, 21(2), 215–221.
Loisel, P., & Anema, J. R. (2013). Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York: Springer.
Løvvik, C., Øverland, S., Hysing, M., Broadbent, E., & Reme, S. E. (2013). Association between illness perceptions and return-to-work expectations in workers with common mental health symptoms. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 24(1), 160–170.
Lundälv, J., Törnbom, M., Larsson, P., & Sunnerhagen, K. (2015). Awareness and the arguments for and against the international classification of functioning, disability and health among representatives of disability organisations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3), 3293–3300.
Maffeo, P. A. (1990). Substantiating psychological injury under the federal employees’ compensation act. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 8(4), 435–445.
Mallon, T. M., Grizzell, T., Holland, L., & Hodgson, M. (2015). Managing federal workers’ compensation injuries and costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, S12–S19. doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000000410
Melhorn, J. M., Ackerman, W. E., Talmage, J. B., Hyman, M. H., & American Medical Association. (2013). AMA guides to the evaluation of disease and injury causation (2nd ed.). Chicago: American Medical Association.
Mendelson, G. (1991). The rating of psychiatric impairment in forensic practice: A review. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 25(1), 84–94.
Miciano, A. (2012). P-1188—Measuring the mental & behavioral disorder permanent impairment in individuals with poly-trauma, according to the AMA guides 6th edition. European Psychiatry, 27, 1. doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(12)75355-5
Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 24(8), 1094–1102.
Moller, H. J. (2014). Self-rating scales. In G. Alexopoulous, S. Kasper, H.-J. Moller, & C. Moreno (Eds.), Guide to assessment scales in major depressive disorder (pp. 23–34). Cham: Springer.
Mortelmans, K. (2013). Return-to-work in sick-listed employees with major depressive disorder. TBV - TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR BEDRIJFS- EN VERZEKERINGSGENEESKUNDE, 21(8), 384.
Moss, R., McFarland, D., Mohin, C. J., & Haynes, B. (2012). Impact on impairment ratings from switching to the American Medical Association’s sixth edition of the guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Retrieved from National Council on Compensation Insurance website: https://www.ncci.com/Articles/Documents/II_Impact_of_AMA_Guides.pdf
Naglieri, J. (2009). Psychometric issues in the assessment of impairment. In S. Goldstein & J. Naglieri (Eds.), Assessing impairment: From theory to practice (pp. 49–57). New York: Springer.
Nazarov, Z., & Lee, C. G. (2012). Disability statistics from the current population survey (CPS).
Pallagrosi, M., Fonzi, L., Picardi, A., & Biondi, M. (2014). Assessing clinician’s subjective experience during interaction with patients. Psychopathology, 47(2), 111–118.
Parry, J. (2010). Civil mental disability law, evidence and testimony: A comprehensive reference manual for lawyers, judges and mental disability professionals. Chicago: American Bar Association, Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law.
Parry, J., & Drogin, E. Y. (2007). Mental disability law, evidence, and testimony: A comprehensive reference manual for lawyers, judges, and mental disability professionals. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, Commission on Mental and Physical Disability Law.
Picardi, A., Martinotti, G., Paci, M., Simi, C., & Caroppo, E. (2011). Reliability of self-reported attachment style in patients with severe psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 491–499.
Preiss, K., Brennan, L., & Clarke, D. (2013). A systematic review of variables associated with the relationship between obesity and depression. Obesity Reviews, 14(11), 906–918.
Ramirez, A., Ekselius, L., & Ramklint, M. (2013). Axis IV—psychosocial and environmental problems—in the DSM-IV. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. doi:10.1111/jpm.12009
Reynolds, C. R., & Horton, A. M. (2012). Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Springer.
Roca, M., Gili, M., Garcia-Garcia, M., Salva, J., Vives, M., Garcia Campayo, J., & Comas, A. (2009). Prevalence and comorbidity of common mental disorders in primary care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 119(1–3), 52–58.
Rogers, R., Bender, S. D., & Johnson, S. F. (2011). A critical analysis of the MND criteria for feigned cognitive impairment: Implications for forensic practice and research. Psychological Injury and Law, 4(2), 147–156.
Rondinelli, R. D. (2008). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed.). Chicago: American Medical Association.
Rondinelli, R. D. (2009). Changes for the new AMA guides to impairment ratings, 6th Edition: Implications and applications for physician disability evaluations. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1(7), 643–656.
Rondinelli, R. D. (2010). Commentary on reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52(12), 1204–1205.
Schultz, I. Z., & Gatchel, R. J. (2015). Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. Boston: Springer.
Schultz, I. Z., & Gatchel, R. J. (2016). Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York: Springer.
Schultz, I. Z., & Rogers, S. (2010). Handbook of job accommodations in mental health. New York: Springer.
Scott, K. M. (2015). Co-morbidity of mental and physical conditions. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 390–393). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Shaw, L. (2016). Working with stakeholders in return to work processes: Multisystem interactions. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of return to work: from research to practice (pp. 327–336). New York: Springer.
Smith, G. N., Ehmann, T. S., Flynn, S. W., MacEwan, G. W., Tee, K., Kopala, L. C., … Honer, W. G. (2011). The assessment of symptom severity and functional impairment with DSM-IV axis V. Psychiatric Services, 62(4), 411–417.
Soklaridis, S., Ammendolia, C., & Cassidy, D. (2010). Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: Psychosocial factors as the product of system issues. Social Science & Medicine, 71(9), 1557–1566.
Spengler, P. M. (2012). Clinical versus mechanical prediction. In J. Graham & J. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 26–49). New York: Wiley.
Spieler, E. A., & Burton, J. F. (2012). The lack of correspondence between work-related disability and receipt of workers’ compensation benefits. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(6), 487–505.
Steenstra, I., & Institute for Work & Health, & Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba. (2012). Systematic review of prognostic factors for workers’ time away from work due to acute low-back pain: An update of a systematic review: Final report to Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health.
Stejskal, W. J. (2013). Psychological testing in workplace disability evaluations. In L. H. Gold & D. L. Vanderpool (Eds.), Clinical guide to mental disability evaluations (pp. 127–154). New York: Springer.
Sullivan, M. J., Adams, H., Yakobov, E., Ellis, T., & Thibault, P. (2016). Psychometric properties of a brief instrument to assess perceptions of injustice associated with debilitating health and mental health conditions. Psychological Injury and Law, 9(1), 48–54. doi:10.1007/s12207-015-9247-x
Talmage, J. B. (2010). The occupational medicine perspective on behavioral health concerns. In P. A. Warren (Ed.), Behavioral health disability: Innovations in prevention and management (pp. 133–143). New York: Springer.
Talmage, J. B., & Martin, D. W. (2011). Reliability of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment and commentary. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(4), 345.
Talmage, J. B., Melhorn, J. M., Hyman, M. H., & American Medical Association. (2011). AMA guides to the evaluation of work ability and return to work. Chicago: American Medical Association.
Tanabe, R. P., & International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions, & Workers Compensation Research Institute (Cambridge, Mass.). (2013). Workers’ compensation laws: As of January 2013. Cambridge: Workers Compensation Research Institute.
Theodore, B. R., Kishino, N. D., & Gatchel, R. J. (2008). Biopsychosocial factors that perpetuate chronic pain, impairment, and disability. Psychological Injury and Law, 1(3), 182–190.
Tiemeier, H. (2011). Adult-onset chronic physical conditions are more common in people who report childhood adversities and early onset mental disorders. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 15(1), 10. doi:10.1136/ebmental-2011-100276
Tungström, S., Söderberg, P., & Armelius, B. (2002). The GAF-scale’s variability in clinical routine work. European Psychiatry, 17, 153. doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(02)80663-0
Turk, M. A., & McDermott, S. (2014). Defining disability (revisited). Disability and Health Journal, 7(4), 367–368.
U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) - Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (DFEC) - Compliance - Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dfec/regs/compliance/fecafact.htm
U.S. Department of Labor - Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) - FECA. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/owcp/regs/compliance/ca_feca.htm
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Modernizing federal disability policy (GAO-07-934SP). Retrieved from U.S. Govt. Accountability Office website: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-934SP
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). SSA disability programs: Progress and challenges related to modernizing (GAO-12-891T). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-891T
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Federal employees’ compensation act: Analysis of proposed changes on USPS beneficiaries (GAO-13-142R). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-142R
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013). Disability insurance: Work activity indicates certain social security disability insurance payments were potentially improper: Report to congressional requesters (GAO-13-635). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-531
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2014). Enhanced policies and management focus needed to address potential physician-assisted fraud (GAO-15-19). Retrieved from http://gao.gov/assets/670/666830.pdf
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Railroad retirement board: Actions needed to reduce continued risk of fraud and improper payments (GAO-15-535T). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-535T
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). A framework for managing fraud risks in federal programs (GAO-15-593SP). Retrieved from United States Government Accountability Office website: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-593SP
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Disability insurance: Preliminary observations on overpayments and beneficiary work reporting (GAO-15-673T). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-673T
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Disability insurance: SSA could do more to prevent overpayments or incorrect waivers to beneficiaries (GAO-16-34). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-34
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015). Disability insurance: Actions needed to help prevent potential overpayments to individuals receiving concurrent federal workers’ compensation (GAO-15-531). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-531
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). Disability insurance: SSA needs to better track efforts and evaluate options to recover debt and deter potential fraud (GAO-16-331). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-331
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). A framework for managing fraud risks in federal programs (GAO-16-375SP). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-375SP
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). SSA needs to better track efforts and evaluate options to recover debt and deter potential fraud (GAO-16-331). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-331
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). Social security administration: SSA could increase savings by refining its selection of cases for disability review (GAO-16-250). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-250
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2016). 2016 annual report: Additional opportunities to reduce fragmentation, overlap, and duplication and achieve other financial benefits (GAO-16-375SP). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-375SP#mt=e-report
Vatnaland, T., Vatnaland, J., Friis, S., & Opjordsmoen, S. (2007). Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 115(4), 326–330.
Vlasveld, M. C., Van der Feltz-Cornelis, C. M., Ader, H. J., Anema, J. R., Hoedeman, R., Van Mechelen, W., & Beekman, A. T. (2012). Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: A randomised controlled trial from the Netherlands depression initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 70(4), 223–230.
Wakefield, J. C. (2010). Misdiagnosing normality: Psychiatry’s failure to address the problem of false positive diagnoses of mental disorder in a changing professional environment. Journal of Mental Health, 19(4), 337–351.
Walker, E. R., McGee, R. E., & Druss, B. G. (2015). Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(4), 334. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2502
Warren, P. A. (2005). The management of workplace mental health issues and appropriate disability prevention strategies. San Diego: Work Loss Data Institute.
Warren, P. A. (2010). Behavioral health disability: Innovations in prevention and management. New York: Springer.
Warren, P. A. (2013a). Those who hesitate are lost: The case for setting behavioral health treatment and disability standards, part I. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(3), 183–195.
Warren, P. A. (2013b). Those who hesitate are lost: The case for setting behavioral health treatment and disability standards, part II. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(3), 196–207.
Warren, P. A. (2013c). Those who hesitate are lost: The case for setting behavioral health treatment and disability standards, part III. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(3), 208–214.
Warsi, M. K., Sattar, S. P., Din, A. U., Petty, F., & Padala, P. R. (2007). Are medical students assigning proper global assessment of functioning scores? Academic Psychiatry, 31(1), 51–56.
White, M. J. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 341–382.
Williams, C. D. (2015). Objective psychiatric assessment and management of chronic disability syndromes. In B. S. Fogel & D. B. Greenberg (Eds.), Psychiatric care of the medical patient (3rd ed., pp. 1643–1677). New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, D. C. (2010). Disability and occupational assessment: Objective diagnosis and quantitative impairment rating. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(6), 336–352.
Williams, N. (2012). AMA guides to the evaluation of work ability and return to work. Occupational Medicine, 62(2), 155.
Winefield, H. R., Saebel, J., & Winefield, A. H. (2010). Employee perceptions of fairness as predictors of workers’ compensation claims for psychological injury: An Australian case-control study. Stress and Health, 26(1), 3–12.
Wood, D. W., Haig, A. J., & Yamakawa, K. S. (2012). Fear of movement/(re)injury and activity avoidance in persons with neurogenic versus vascular claudication. The Spine Journal, 12(4), 292–300.
World Health Organization. (2010). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF (WHA54.21). Retrieved from World Health Organization website: http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA54/ea54r21.pdf?ua=1
Yamauchi, K., Ono, Y., Baba, K., & Ikegami, N. (2001). The actual process of rating the global assessment of functioning scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42(5), 403–409.
Young, G. (2008). Causality and causation in law, medicine, psychiatry, and psychology: Progression or regression? Psychological Injury and Law, 1, 161–181. doi:10.1007/s12207-008-9017-0
Young, G. (2014). Malingering, feigning, and response bias in psychiatric/psychological injury: Implications for practice and court. New York: Springer.
Young, G. (2015). Towards balanced VA and SSA policies in psychological injury disability assessment. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(3), 200–218.
Young, G., Kane, A. W., Nicholson, K., & Shuman, D. W. (2007). Causality of psychological injury: Presenting evidence in court. (Springer e-books.). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warren, P.A. The Usage of the AMA Guides for the Determination of Psychological Injury Within the State and Federal Workers’ Compensation Systems. Psychol. Inj. and Law 9, 313–340 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9273-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9273-3